Nigeria Content Online

Two members of the House of Representatives have denied
knowledge of summons of the Libyan envoy to Nigeria, said to have been invited
by the House in the aftermath of Mr. Gaddafi’s call for Nigeria’s split.

After Mr. Gaddafi’s comments last week, the House, as part of a
series of resolutions last week, had urged the Federal Government to recall
Nigeria’s envoy to Libya for consultations, while his Libyan counterpart to Nigeria
was due to be summoned to the House, in protest.

Umar Bature, whose Foreign Affairs committee was expected to
conduct the planned talks with the envoy, and Halims Agoda, the sponsor of the
last Thursday’s motion, said they were unaware of such invitations to the
Libyan Ambassador, although it has been widely reported by the media.

Mr. Bature (PDP, Sokoto State), responded to inquiries by NEXT
on the date of such summons, saying, “To my knowledge, there is no such
invitation.” He said the House “only” condemned the comments of Mr. Gaddafi,
without enlisting further prayers.

Mr. Agoda, the House Air Force committee chairman, said although
they resolved to do more than “condemn” Mr. Gaddafi’s controversial remarks,
the prayers excluded summons on the envoy.

“We urged the Federal Government to recall Nigeria’s ambassador
for consultations which it has done, and also to liaise with the African Union
to investigate the link between the comments and the source of the infiltrators
who have been killing our people,” he said.

No formal rebuttal

During last Thursday’s session, Mr. Agoda, who sponsored the
original motion, had called for the condemnations on Mr. Gaddafi’s remark and
the investigations on the source of the attackers in recent violence in Jos,
Plateau State.

However, during the debate carried live on national television,
other members amended part of the prayers and called for the recall of Nigerian
ambassador to Libya and the summoning of Libyan envoy to Nigeria.

The House has made no formal rebuttal of the decision, even
after wide media reportage. Many of its resolutions sponsored by members have
been seen as largely routine and bearing no enforcement. According to the House
Legislative compliance committee, the level of adherence to such adoptions,
particularly by the executive arm, exceeds a little above 30 per cent by June
2009.

If last week’s resolutions are listed in the Votes and Proceedings, the
denials by the members will highlight such low compliance, which at times, even
the sponsoring members are accused of.