Airlines disobey relocation directive
The Airline
Operators of Nigeria, on Monday, instructed its members not to obey the
relocation directive issued to domestic carriers operating at the
General Aviation Terminal, Lagos, by the Federal Airports Authority of
Nigeria.
Explaining that the
notice of relocation given to airlines operating at the terminal is
illegal, the body said that the airports authority has no right to order
carriers to vacate the old local airport and start their services in
the new terminal which is owned by Bi-Courtney Aviation Services
Limited. “FAAN has no right, therefore, to relocate our members to any
terminal which presently does not belong to them,” said Steve Mahonwu,
the Chairman of the group, during a press briefing at the presidential
wing of the Murtala Muhammed Airport, Lagos. “The action of FAAN is a
violation of contract agreement between FAAN and our members, which is
tantamount to victimisation and unnecessary use of force.”
Biased directive
Mr Mahonwu said that
the relocation order was given to other airlines operating in the old
terminal excluding Arik Air, and maintained that the development if
implemented will only cause chaos in the sector on the grounds that the
directive is biased. “The Airline Operators of Nigeria totally rejects
the illegal relocation of our members which immediately tends to create
monopoly by one of our members, Arik Air, against three others or more,”
he said. “We believe in equity and justice and are committed to protect
all our members from the cudgels of any aviation parastatal to enhance
harmony and judicious acts of governance.”
A copy of the
relocation directive did not stipulate reasons why the airlines are to
relocate. Efforts to get the aim for the decision were not successful as
the public affairs manager for the authority, Akin Olukunle, could not
be reached at his office and his mobile phones were all switched off.
Bi-Courtney should develop GAT
Mr Mahonwu said that
the concession agreement between the federal government, who is the
guarantor, and Bi-Courtney, the concessionaire, accorded the later the
right of refusal to develop the General Aviation Terminal, and explained
that the airport authority, being the representative of the government,
retains the portfolio of landlord and consolidator of all concessionary
deals at the airports. “You will recall that we forced all airlines to
relocate to MMA2 to allow Bi-Courtney to expand and modernise the
General Aviation Terminal as a befitting terminal just like London,
Paris and New York City in Ikeja land,” he said. “But Arik Airlines
refused sighting security concerns. The security questions were
inspected and cleared by IATA (International Air Transport Association)
as non-existent.”
The airline operators argued that the relocation directive is a
deliberate plan by FAAN to circumvent the concessionary agreement as a
privilege to Arik Air. “AON, therefore, believes that every airline has
the right to exist and make legitimate business without any favour
provided we pay all our rates and taxes as due,” he said. “We,
therefore, appeal to all our members to pay their Passenger Service
Charges to FAAN and others as due to enhance harmony.”