Nigeria Content Online

The senate, on
Wednesday, deferred debate on the request of the government of Sao Tome
and Principe for the alteration of terms for a $30 million loan it owes
Nigeria.

The senate stood
down the request because the request was not presented to the senators
with the required details on Wednesday. President Goodluck Jonathan had
requested the lawmakers to approve a request by the government of Sao
Tome and Principe to extend the tenor of the $30 million soft loan
which it received from Nigeria early this year from the agreed six
years to thirty. According to Mr Jonathan, the prime minister of Sao
Tome and Principe asked for the alteration of the loan conditions due
to an IMF program which the country entered into recently which does
not allow them to take only long term loans.

New terms

Earlier this year,
both the senate and the Executive Council of the Federation had
approved the USD30 million loan to the government of Sao Tome and
Principe with a tenor of six years, no interest charge, and moratorium
with a disbursement plan of $10 million every six months, over an 18
months period. Now, the prime minister of Sao Tome and Principe is
asking for the same loan amount but for a tenor of 30 years, a six
years moratorium and three years disbursement plan, still at no
interest charge.

Although the first
tranche of $10 million have been disbursed, the loan agreements are yet
to be signed by the government of both nations. “In view of the
strategic nature of our relationship with Democratic Republic of Sao
Tome and Principe, and considering the need to provide all necessary
and reasonable support to the country, the prime minister’s request was
acceded to,” Mr Jonathan stated in his letter indicating that the
executive arm have agreed to the borrowing country’s request.

More details required

President Jonathan
said the adjusted conditions will not adversely affect the finances of
Nigeria but the senators said they want a detailed document, besides
the later, to be enable them make up their minds adequately. “Unless
somebody presents the details of the document, we have nothing to
contribute,” said James Manager (PDP Delta state). His submission set
up an argument that led to the eventual withdrawal of the request for
proper presentation on another legislative day. “Although the letter is
self explanatory, we will step it down and take it on another
legislative day,” said Senate president David Mark.

The Senate has
blamed the federal government and the government of Zamfara State for
the tragic death of 163 people, mostly children below the age of five,
during the recent outbreak of lead poisoning in the state. A minute
silence was observed by the senators on the back of a motion by Sahabi
Ya’u (PDP Zamfara state) which noted the federal government’s carefree
attitude to issues concerning the lives of Nigerians.

The senators
criticized both the federal and local governments, for allowing the
disaster happen. They argued that if the government had strictly
implemented the mining laws, built a clinic within the community, or
even responded to the disaster rapidly, the deaths would have few. “It
is a pity we have to mourn this avoidable death of our citizens due to
our carelessness.” Patrick Osakwe (PDP Delta state) said.

“If we had taken the mining act seriously, we wouldn’t have been here discussing this today.” Ayogu Eze (PDP Enugu state) said.

John Shagaya (PDP
Plateau state) lamented the lack of urgency in the manner that the
federal government has handled the disaster, noting that till date
government has not inaugurated a committee set up on the issue.

Blame game

Ahmed Yerima (ANPP
Zamfara state) who was governor of the affected state for eight years
also decried the inability of the federal government to send relief
materials to the surviving victims.

“In other
countries, the government would have declared a state of emergency in
the area.” Mr. Yerima said. “But till now federal government has not
done anything by sending relief to the affected people.” The disaster
was caused by the activities of illegal miners of iron ore in Anka and
Bukkuyum local government areas of the state in April this year.

The villagers
turned miners were said to take crushed rocks home from the mine and
this resulted in the soil being contaminated from lead and the people
were thereafter poisoned through hand to mouth contamination. Many were
contaminated by contacts with contaminated tools and water.

The poisoning had
both social and economic effects on surviving victims and will likely
affect their ability to procreate while damaging livestock and crops.

While debating the
motion, Erhiawarie Eferakeye (PDP Delta state), a professor of
pharmacology, advised that the government immediately begins proper
medical screening of the survivors as the poisoning could have long
term after effect.

The Senate,
however, resolved to investigate the crisis and urged the federal,
state and local government to embark on sensitisation campaign on the
danger of illegal mining.

Former president, Olusegun Obasanjo,
did not have a closed-door meeting nor any discussion with Dimeji
Bankole, during their “chance meeting” on Tuesday in Lagos, an aide to
Mr Obasanjo said on Wednesday.

A statement signed by Adeoba Ojekunle,
Mr. Obasanjo’s special assistant, stated that contrary to media
reports, the meeting at the Presidential Wing of Murtala Muhammed
Airport “was an inadvertent development and not a secret or
‘closed-door’ meeting.” The statement specifically referred to a
newspaper report which claimed that the former president and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives discussed behind closed-doors
at the airport.

Father-son talks

“While General Obasanjo was waiting
for a private plane to convey him to Kinshasa yesterday, June 29, 2010,
he and honourable Speaker Bankole happened to be at the Presidential
Wing of the airport together,” said Mr Ojekunle. “At the chance
meeting, the honourable speaker greeted General Obasanjo as a son would
greet his father, and General Obasanjo also responded accordingly, as a
father would greet his son. There was neither a closed-door meeting nor
discussion of any issue.

Mr. Ojekunle, however, said that the
speaker must have visited Lagos to attend a meeting, or was on another
appointment, and not necessarily to have any discussion with Mr.
Obasanjo. “General Obasanjo was not part of such meeting and the nature
of such meeting is not known to him,” he stated.

Mr. Obasanjo, who arrived at the
airport 20 minutes after the speaker landed at the VIP tarmac from
Abuja on a Nigerian Air Force (NAF) aircraft, headed straight to the
airport lounge without saying a word to journalists. Mr Bankole, who
had been in Lagos since Friday, left for Abuja on Monday only to return
at about 2.30pm on Tuesday at minutes interval to the former president
arrival too.

The duo met behind closed doors for
about 30 minutes at the presidential lounge of the Murtala Muhammed
Airport (MMA), Lagos. The meeting between the two men may not be
unconnected with Mr. Bankole’s current battle to retain his position as
the Speaker of the House, amidst allegations of financial impropriety
and contract inflation. The two men, however, refused to answer
questions about the reason for their meeting.

When confronted by aviation correspondents, Mr. Obasanjo refused to
answer any of their questions which included queries about the meeting;
his views about Ibrahim Babangida’s 2011 presidential aspirations; the
country’s 50 year anniversary; and the amount earmarked for the
celebrations; and Goodluck Jonathan’s bid for president come 2011.
Turning to his daughter, Kemi Obasanjo, the ex-president said: “They
(reporters) love my face and I love their faces.”

The crisis rocking
the Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Ogbomosho,
yesterday took a new turn, following the directive of the Oyo State
House of Assembly that staff of the institution who are Oyo State
indigenes should report at the newly established teaching hospital of
the university in Ogbomosho, Oyo State.

In compliance with
the directive, workers who are indigenes of Oyo State at the teaching
hospital arm of the university in Osogbo withdrew their services en
mass to relocate to Ogbomosho.

About ten 18-seater
buses and some private cars left the premises of the teaching hospital,
Osogbo, at about 9.00am yesterday, to report in Ogbomoso.

The university,
which was established in 1990, is jointly owned by Oyo and Osun
governments. Trouble started last year when the Oyo State government
started the construction of another teaching hospital for the
university at Ogbomoso, which prompted the Osun State government to
express fear over the action.

The crisis was
debated at the Oyo State House of Assembly last Tuesday, leading to its
directive that the state government should disengage from the joint
ownership of the institution.

The house also
directed all its indigenes working in LAUTECH Teaching Hospital,
Osogbo, to report yesterday to Ogbomoso, for further directive from the
management of the institution.

Act of illegality

It also resolved
that all academic staff members of the University Teaching Hospital and
College of Health Sciences, Osogbo, who are non-indigenes of Oyo State,
and are willing to take up employment with the management of LAUTECH
should also report to the management at Ogbomoso yesterday.

It was gathered
that the house took the decision as part of the state’s moves to severe
joint ownership of LAUTECH with Osun State.

Teachers in the
public primary and secondary schools in Oyo State will proceed on an
indefinite strike on Monday, July 5, to protest the non-implementation
of the new Teachers’ Salary Structure (TSS) in the state.

The decision was
reached at an emergency congress of the state’s chapter of the Nigeria
Union of Teachers (NUT) on Wednesday, after assessing the outcome of
the meeting between the leadership of the union and the state governor,
Adebayo Alao-Akala, on Tuesday. The governor had incurred the teachers’
wrath for his government’s insistence on not implementing the new
special wage structure for them. This has led to series of agitations
which culminated in a warning strike observed every Wednesday in the
last 21 days. At the meeting held with the leadership of the teachers’
union on Tuesday, the governor insisted that the government lacks the
wherewithal to foot the monthly bill for teachers’ wages if the
enhanced pay would be implemented.

Rather, he asked
them to choose between retrenching some of them, or wait till the
federal government approves the proposed new salary scale for
government workers across the country. However, neither of the options
appealed to the teachers gathered at the state of the Nigeria Labour
Congress (NLC) yesterday to get the report of the meeting between the
government and their leaders.

Immediate action

The governor’s
action subsequently prodded the teachers to demand for the immediate
commencement of the strike immediately. All efforts from their leaders
to make them see why they should prepare better for the indefinite
strike were bluntly rebuffed. After putting the options of starting the
strike immediately and later to voice vote, the majority favoured
immediate action. Olu Abiala, state secretary of the union, who
conducted the congress, had to beg them before they agreed to wait till
Monday before the strike starts.

He told them that
it would be unfair to the government if the outcome of yesterday
meeting was not communicated to them before the strike starts proper.
The congress, who were mobilized from different parts of the state,
intermittently sang anti-government songs, and occasionally rained
curses on the government for wanting to starve them to death. Although
the agitation for the enhanced teachers’ pay has being on for about two
years in the state, the aggrieved NUT members began a definite step
against the government three weeks ago when they began a 21 warning
strike.

During the period, the teachers skipped work on Wednesdays, and wore
black attires to work the following days to register their displeasure
over the non-implementation of the scheme.

The House of
Representatives Committee on Public Procurement, on Wednesday,
disclosed that it has commenced “thorough monitoring” of how funds
assigned to various aviation agencies are being spent.

This is coming
after last week’s directive by the committee to the Nigerian Airspace
Management Agency (NAMA), mandating the agency to halt further action
on its 17 million Euro contract for the installation of 27 units of
Aeronautical Information Service (AIS) in all airports across the
country following alleged poor handling of the deal by the Ministry of
Aviation and the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP). “We are here to
oversight departments and agencies under the aviation sector in
continuance of the oversight function we embarked on two weeks ago; and
the whole idea is to track how public funds are used vis-à-vis
procurement from the bidding,” said Yusuf Tuggar, chairman and leader
of the committee while speaking to aviation correspondents at the
presidential wing of the Murtala Muhammed Airport (MMA), Lagos.

Observing from afar

According to Mr.
Tuggar, the committee have been observing and monitoring the agencies
from a distance, adding that the 22 members of the House will commence
their scrutiny with the airspace agency before visiting other
authorities in the industry. “We are going to start with NAMA; we are
going to visit FAAN also, and all the other parastatals under the
aviation sector,” he said. “We will have our information, for we want
to know what they have been doing from the advertising stage to award
and implementation, which we hope to see also for ourselves. So it is
an ongoing thing.”

Explaining why the
committee terminated the contract by NAMA, Mr. Tuggar said that the
House received a petition against the agency, stressing that the
airspace management failed to honour the invitation sent them by the
House of Representatives. “We did receive a petition and we had a
public hearing on Monday, NAMA failed to show up, the ministry failed
to show up, but BPP showed up with a particular contract about
Aeronautical Information System,” he said. “We wrote them insisting
they suspend all further action on that particular contract, which is
the AIS. Because there was a lower bidder, yet the contract was awarded
to someone who bided higher. And then there seems to have been a
unilateral negotiation. But know that the Act does not say that you
pick one contractor and you go and negotiate with them. It has to be
open, it has to be competitive, and it has to be transparent.”

Penalising defaulters

The committee
chairman, however, disclosed that the House does not have the right to
penalise agencies found of contravening the act, rather defaulters will
channelled to the appropriate disciplinary arms of government. “We are
not a law enforcement body, so if we find them culpable, if we deem it
fit, we can send on the information to law enforcement body such as
EFCC or the police or any other one,” he said. “That’s if there is a
clear violation of the Public Procurement Act, a grave one that we feel
requires that.”

“The fear of being
a victim of crime is far higher than the possibility of being a victim.
People who are afraid of crime are virtually incapacitated. It affects
social relationships, economic activities, political stability and
confidence, especially in the government and law enforcement agencies,”
said Etannibi Alemika, a professor of criminology at the University of
Jos.

Mr. Alemika said
this Tuesday while presenting the findings of a national criminal
victimisation and safety survey held between 2007 and 2009 involving
10,228 respondents across the 36 states of Nigeria and Abuja. The
survey was conducted by CLEEN Foundation (formerly known as the Centre
for Law Enforcement Education); Practical Sampling International (PSI),
a field survey company; and DC Pro-Data Consult Ltd, a data management
company.

The findings
revealed that an overall national figure of 86.6 per cent of
respondents expressed a “very high degree of fear”, with the most
troubled respondents residing in Gombe, Abuja, Plateau, Ebonyi, Ondo
and Sokoto. It also revealed that the dominant forms of crime in the
country were theft (money, GSM handset, agricultural products, cars,
etc), robbery, domestic violence, physical assault and burglary.

From the
statistics provided, three-fifths (60 per cent) of all respondents said
corruption has increased in the last three years, with Ogun, Abia,
Nasarawa and Imo States being perceived as the most corrupt states in
Nigeria.

On public
officials viewed as most corrupt, Mr. Alemika said 51.7 per cent of
respondents complained of having been solicited for bribe by the Police
in the past 12 months. This was followed by the department of
Immigration (29.8 per cent), the Federal Road Safety Corps (29.4 per
cent), the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (27.6 per cent), the Custom
Service (26.0 per cent) and lecturers in tertiary institutions (23.2
per cent).

“More than 50 per
cent of those who report to the Police said they were dissatisfied with
the police. The major source of this dissatisfaction has to do with
their lack of capacity and gross ineffectiveness. Then, police
treatment of complainants and their integrity or lack of it, which has
to do with bribery and the Police colluding with suspects,” said Mr.
Alemika.

Reason for the study

Explaining the
objectives of the survey, CLEEN Foundation’s executive director,
Innocent Chukwuma, said, “investment in producing reliable statistics
on crime in Nigeria and promotion of their use in police planning and
deployment” has been overlooked over the years, making the federal
government, which controls law enforcement agencies, to appear
“helpless and hopeless”.

“Our objectives
include generating reliable complimentary data to official statistics
on crime and assist policy makers in crime prevention and control
planning. It will provide the Police with an information base that
would help it in the deployment of policing resources to areas most
needed and contribute in reducing the high level of fear of crime in
Nigeria,” Mr. Chukwuma said.

Moses Olusola, the
general manager of Practical Sampling International, said the
stratified multi-stage random selection procedure was used to select
female and male adult respondents aged 18 and above across the 37
states, who had lived in urban and rural households for a period of not
less than six months.

The conveners of
the conference said the survey’s findings will soon be published in a
book and advertised in the newspapers for easy access by the public.

The House of
Representatives might recommend the blacklisting of the construction
giant, Julius Berger Plc, and other construction firms for allegedly
over-evaluating and other sundry contractual offences in the contract
for the rehabilitation of the Lagos-Ota-Abeokuta Expressway.

The chairman of the
House Committee on Works, Chukwuma Onyema, who disclosed this yesterday
at a meeting with officials of the Federal Ministry of Works in Abuja,
also lamented that the works on the road have been abandoned. Mr
Onyema, who was only appointed into the position early June, complained
of the shoddy handling of the road contracts in the country, stressing
it is lamentable.

He also said that
the Minister of State for Works, Chris Ogiemwonyi, shared the
displeasure of members of the committee and doubted the competence of
most contractors, handling some roads in the country.

The members of the
committee, who spoke one after the other at the meeting, said Julius
Berger Plc failed in the project, and regretted that the contract which
the Works ministry claimed in its report, is 87% completed, has jumped
from its original contract sum of N11.930 billion to over N33 billion.
They described the increase as “astronomical and bogus.” The lawmakers
criticized the company for failing to appear before them despite an
invitation to it last week. The House had passed a resolution on
Thursday last week, mandating its works committee to invite the
Minister of Works, Sanusi Daggash, over a plethora of abandoned road
projects in the country. Last month, the senate committee on
environment also criticised Julius Berger and other construction
companies for the poor handling of their stone quarries in Abuja. The
committee, which described the operations as dangerous and unhealthy
for the environment, gave the companies about two weeks to clean up
their acts or face sanctions.

Half done

Subsequently, the
committee began its hearings on the dualisation of phases 1-4 of the
Abuja-Abaji Road in Kogi State, handled by Dantata & Sawoe in the
first phase, Reynolds Construction in the second phase, Bulletin
Company Limited in the third phase and Gitto Construction in the fourth
phase. The first phase of the contract was supposed to gulp
N11.227billion, and the commencement date was 3rd August, 2006, and to
be completed February 2, 2009, but the contract the Ministry of Works
told the Committee, was, due to logistics extended to February 2, 2011.

Though the amount “certified so far for the project,” pegged at
N6.445billion is released, the contract, is just at 51% completion
level, while its phase was budgeted at N9.627billion, the contractor
got N5billion, but just about 50.58% completed. The third phase of the
contract, handled by bulletin, was for N9.697billion.

Cable television
networks will soon operate pay-as-you-go. Eddy Aina, a director at the
office of the Director General of the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission,
NBC, said the organisation is working on and will soon establish a
policy that will compel cable television networks in Nigeria to charge
as the consumers use their services.

Mr. Aina was
responding to concerns raised at the Consumer Forum organised by the
Consumer Advocacy Forum of Nigeria (CAFON) at the Lagos Television,
Agidingbi, Ikeja on Tuesday. Many consumers, including Shola Salako,
president, CAFON, and the convener of the forum complained that the
major cable networks in the country, DSTV and HiTV, are ripping
consumers off by charging for services that are sometimes not provided
or they cannot access due to poor power supply. “In the next few
months, NBC is going to come up with a pay-as-you go policy for the
cable TV networks,” said Mr Aina. “As for tariff, it is an industry
thing. They set up the tariff and if you ask why it is so high in
Nigeria they will tell you the poor infrastructure like poor power
supply made it so. But when government is able to settle the issue of
electricity then we can ask them to reduce the tariff.”

At this edition of
the monthly consumer forum which focused on getting better services
from cable TV networks, officials and members of the Sports Viewing
Centres Association of Nigeria voiced their grievances, particularly as
it relates to their on-going tussle with HiTV.

‘It’s a rip off’

The president of
the association, Seye Aluko, said they are insisting on not paying the
N15,000 monthly subscription fee that HiTV is charging for viewing
centres as against N6,000 for home use. “HiTV started well by telling
us to buy decoder with subscription for N2,500; that time it was only
La Liga they were showing. The next season they got English Premier
League and they increased to N3,000. From that to N4,000; from N4,000
to N6,000; from N6000 to N15,000, haba! HiTV,” said Deolu Ogubanjo,
president of the National Association of Telecom Subscribers of Nigeria.

Mrs. Salako advised the proprietors of the viewing centres to
register with the NBC and the Lagos State Consumer Protection Committee
so that their case can be settled through those authorities. She also
raised questions of consumers who had contacted her before the
programme, including why the cable network goes off when it is raining,
considering that the consumer’s money is still reading whether there is
rain or not? The representatives of DSTV, Segun Fayose and that of
HiTV, Vivian Chigboh, attempted to answer all the questions.

An Abuja High
Court, on Tuesday, said that an order forcefully ejecting Eseme Eyiboh,
the chairman of the House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, from
his house in Abuja was given in error. The court ordered Mr. Eyiboh to
take back possession of the home.

Earlier this month,
armed policemen stormed Mr. Eyiboh’s residence, located at 7A Iyamoye
Close, off Gimbiya Street, Area 11, Garki, at about 8 a.m and threw out
his belongings. They were accompanied by officials of the court and
relations of the man who is disputing the property with the lawmaker.

History of the case

Mr. Eyiboh, a
member from Akwa Ibom State, has been engaged in a contentious dispute
with Senator Hassan Muhammed Gusau since 2008 over the land on which he
erected his house.

The lawmaker said
that he bought the property in 2007 from the family of late Sheik
Mujaddadi. However, Mr. Gusau also claimed to have purchased the same
property from the same administrators.

When he discovered
the counter sale, Mr. Eyiboh sued the administrators of Mujaddadi’s
estate and sought a court order to keep from being evicted from a
property he claimed he validly bought.

However, in
February 2008, Mr. Eyiboh testified that the senator invaded his home
with 14 young men, a team of armed policemen, and a bailiff from the
Upper Court Area with the intent to evict him.

Mr. Gusau, a
senator from Zamfara, had got a writ of possession from a Sharia court
in Jigawa State and a letter from an Abuja Upper Area Court judge,
directing the police to aid the enforcement of the eviction. Mr. Eyiboh
said that he called in his lawyers who intervened and succeeded in
dissuading the team from carrying out the eviction.

Last month, the
member petitioned the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related
Offences Commission (ICPC), alleging that Mr. Akoyi, the judge who
authorised the letter, had abused his office and should be investigated
by the commission.

“I strongly believe
that M.U. Akoyi attempted to help my adversaries take illegal
possession of my property, because he must either have been bribed or
given some other incentives to knowingly exceed his jurisdiction,” Mr.
Eyiboh said.

“I cannot
comprehend how an Upper Area Court in Gwagwalada can direct execution
against a property located in Garki, in the centre of the city,” he
said.

In his written
address, Mr. Gusau argued that he had asked Mr. Eyiboh to sell the
property to him because Sharia law does not allow a non-Muslim to buy
the estate of a Muslim when he dies.

However, Mr. Eyiboh
dispelled that argument, saying that the Sharia Law clause does not
specify that the buyer must be a Muslim, but rather, that the buyer
must be a neighbour, which Mr. Eyiboh was, and Mr. Gusau was not.

The ruling

Delivering the
ruling, Othman Musa said that the court’s decision took precedence over
any of Mr. Gusau’s eviction orders, including the most recent one made
on June 3, 2010. He ordered that the Chief Registrar of the High Court
take the necessary steps to restore Mr. Eyiboh’s possession of the
property without delay.

“I have gone
through the prayers and its counter views canvassed by the third
respondents (Mr. Gusau). It shows clearly that the application has
merit,” said Mr. Musa.

“It is regrettable that the court, on May 28, granted an ex parte
order, which temporarily dispossessed Eyiboh of his valid property.”