The
federal government may soon roll-out punitive measures against senior
civil servants who abstained from writing last Monday’s competence and
promotion pre-qualification examination organised by the Office of the
Head of Civil Service of the Federation.
The examination was
conducted at the International Conference Centre in Abuja, for senior
civil servants on Grade Levels 14 to 16, otherwise referred to as the
directorate cadre.
Investigations
carried out in Abuja during the week showed that the government was not
happy with the widespread condemnation and boycott of the examination
orchestrated and spearheaded by the Association of Senior Civil
Servants of Nigeria (ASCSN). A senior official at the Head of Service’s
office, who spoke on condition of anonymity, disclosed that the
government views the abstention as a clear case of the insubordination
and indiscipline that it has been trying to tackle in the public sector
service.
He said a
far-reaching government decision is in the offing, no thanks to the
angry reactions from most of the senior civil servants who wrote the
examination, and who have accused the Head of the Civil Service of the
Federation, Steve Oronsaye, of disrespecting the court case filed by
the ASCSN.
The judge handling
the case, however, threw it out last Wednesday, saying further hearing
on it is useless as the test had already taken place. David Okorowo,
the judge of the Federal High Court, Abuja, struck out a motion seeking
to stop the test but consequently adjourned the substantive suit to
October 22 for hearing.
Mr Oronsaye is said
to be reviewing the exercise and all the issues surrounding the
boycott. A senior official in his office said that if the federal
government goes ahead with its plan to sanction the absentees, it could
result in outright sack, suspension, or non-promotion of all those that
would be identified.
The Chief Press Secretary to Mr Oronsaye, Tope Ajakaiye, confirms this.
“The civil service
has rules and regulations,” he said. “This (body of rules and
regulations) is what is called Public Service Rules. There is a
procedure for seeking redress if a civil servant feels his or her case
was not fairly treated. But what they did is obviously wrong. For every
act of indiscipline in the civil service, there is a sanction. At the
right time, they will be sanctioned. Do not forget that the Federal
Government of Nigeria issued the directive that they disobeyed. I can
assure you that they will be sanctioned at the right time.” Mr
Ajakaiye, who did not state the particular punishment the government
will mete out, explained that over 3000 civil servants actually sat for
the examination. He said the process witnessed no ugly incident,
whatsoever.
Widespread condemnation
Some civil servants who sat for the test were, however, unimpressed with its handling.
A Director in a
government parastatal, who didn’t want to be identified, said, “The
examination is the worst exam the public service could be subjected to.
The training has no bearing whatsoever with the kind of questions we
were asked to answer. Essentially, the questions were meant to be
applied to the training organised to meet those kinds of questions. For
instance, the training I attended, which was the first batch, we never
had course materials. Even after our training, the exam did not take
place until after six months. There were others who finished
immediately and went for the test. I am sure they are the ones that
will be lucky to pass.
“If officers are to
be subjected to this kind of test, there should be a procedure, maybe a
handbook, a textbook in which you know where you concentrate and pass.
A situation in
which an exam is prepared so that people can fail from the beginning, I
do not think is good for this country. That man (Oronsaye) may have a
good idea but the implementation is very horrible.” Another participant
at the test, a female Assistant Director, said she took the test
against her will in order not to risk sudden termination of her job.
Legal protection
Public sector
experts say the federal government may take some time before
sanctioning the absentees because a wait-and-see position was necessary
in respect of the court case.
According to legal
experts, one possible means such senior civil servants could take to
protect their jobs is to explore the full options of respite provided
by the laws of the land.
Asked what impact
the court case could have on the examination, especially as it has
already been conducted, Mr Ajakaiye said the Head of Service was not
aware of any case in court against him or his office.
“A court case
usually involves two or parties, each of which must be properly served
with the court papers. As at now, we are not aware of any court case
that has been instituted by any group. As I am talking to you right
now, the HOS has not been served any notice.” About 104 plaintiffs
filed the suit, challenging the directive from the HOS Office
compelling them to write a competence examination. Apart from the HOS,
the other defendants are: the Federal Civil Service Commission (FCSC)
and the Attorney-General of the Federation, who is also the Minister of
Justice.
The plaintiffs are
arguing that their promotion to the next directorate cadre is vested in
the Federal Civil Service Commission, the 2nd defendant, as provided in
the relevant sections of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution of
the Federal Republic and not in the Head of the Civil Service of the
Federation, the first defendant.
The FCSC, which
could not be reached for official reaction to the test as at the time
of going to press, has remained silent on the examination.
Commenting on the discipline displayed by those who defied the rains
to write the examination, Mr Oronsaye said, “It is interesting that
while the association was calling up people not to register for the
test, many of its members actually turned out to register. Here, they
have written the test.”