Archive for nigeriang

‘Cybercrime affects Internet services in Nigeria’

‘Cybercrime affects Internet services in Nigeria’

With
the increase in cybercrime in Nigeria, professionals in the Information
and Communication Technology (ICT) sector are emphasising the need for
the government to do more to discourage the crime in order to save the
country’s Internet services. They say the crime affects the reception
of the Internet by Nigerians who mostly view it as a tool for fraud.

Speaking in Lagos
on Friday, Samuel Adeleke, the president of the Internet Service
Providers Association of Nigeria (ISPAN), said that low penetration of
Internet in Nigeria is a major challenge that has affected the
development of the country.

“It is a shame to
say that an average Nigerian is a novice when it comes to the use the
Internet and that is why we condemn the misuse of the Internet because
what most people use it for is to chat, send emails and at best to
download some programmes.

“We are not an
Internet hungry nation; we need to change our attitude in this
direction. There is need for Internet ratification and also the need
for active involvement of Nigeria both in perceptive and as well as
influencing decision makings.”

Cyber fraud

Mr. Adeleke explained that one major factor that affects Internet penetration in Nigeria is cyber crime.

“When we talk of
various aspect of Internet management in and outside Africa, we are
sure to say that Nigeria is not fully actively involved like other
countries such as Ghana or South African in terms of Internet
penetration. There is need to influence public perception of Internet
usage from the bad use. Just a few make good use of it for developing
applications for better life.”

“Our thinking as
Nigerians is that the Internet is only used by a few and those that use
it do it for cyber crime ‘yahoo, yahoo’ rather than trying to find a
way for getting more people to use it for development purposes,” added
Mr. Adeleke.

No policy on Cyber security

Also speaking on
the issue in an email response to NEXT on Sunday, Jimson Olufuye, the
president, Information Technology Association of Nigeria (ITAN) said
the lack of policy to tackle cybercrime is a major problem to the
sector.

“Major issues of
cybercrime are identity theft, hacking, spamming, phishing, sabotage
through cyberstalking etc. In Nigeria non- availability of legislative
frameworks to tackle cybercrime and assure cybersecurity are concerns.

“I do not think the
issue can be easily solved; it’s going to be a part of us just like
normal theft, robbery etc. Now is the time for the federal government
and regulators put in place appropriate legislations on cybersecurity
to mitigate the crime. They need to be involved in public enlightenment
on the issue and emphasize the implications of such ventures,” said Mr.
Olufuye.

Earlier this year,
the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) launched a toolkit for
cybercrime legislation in order to reduce cyber-related crimes globally.

Mr. Olufuye urged Nigeria to associate with the Union in making use of the toolkit to check cybercrime in the country.

“I think that the
Nigerian ICT sector should associate with the ITU body in order to join
force by implementing the use the toolkit to reduce cybercrime. There
is need for professionals to advocate for appropriate policies and
legislation against cybercrimes.

‘Digital amnesty’

Mr. Adeleke, however concluded that there is a need to educate Nigerians to avoid such cybercrimes through digital amnesty.

“There in need for
digital amnesty, this is not say that we can handle cybercrimes, but we
want to be able to educate Nigerians on the use of the Internet because
it involves job creation, youth development, public awareness and
providing an alternative use of the Internet,” said Mr. Adeleke.

Go to Source

‘Follow Constitution to resolve Yar’Adua’s absence’

‘Follow Constitution to resolve Yar’Adua’s absence’

The opposition party, Action Congress (AC), has said the
Executive Council of the Federation’s decision to invoke Section 144 of the
Constitution to resolve the issue of President Umaru Yar’Adua’s lingering
illness should not be regarded as mere emotion.

In a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary,
Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the party said it has no doubt that if the Constitution is
strictly followed, the executive council will not wait a day longer to start
the process of declaring the president incapacitated, based on his long-term
illness.

“Those who are trying to appeal to our emotion, who are saying
we should keep the president in office, even if he is unable to perform his
official functions, must be told in clear terms that one cannot eat his cake
and have it too. It is either we want to be ruled by law or by emotion,” the
statement read.

A Constitutional issue

President Yar’Adua has not been able to function officially
since November 2009, the party spokesperson said. However, the writers of the
Constitution anticipated such a situation, which is why they made the provision
for Section 144.

“Now, we are being told by self-acclaimed guardians of the
president that our morality will be debased if we follow the stipulations of
our Constitution to resolve this lingering issue. These moralists are saying
there is no difference between the occupier of the presidency, who is an
individual, and the presidency itself, which is an institution. They are saying
national interest should be subjugated to personal interest.

“They are saying we must maintain the status quo and have an
acting president that stays that way indefinitely. No, the Constitution did not
make provision for an indefinite acting presidency. We must resolve this issue
within the dictates of the Constitution, remove the Sword of Damocles that
Yar’Adua’s invisible presidency has become on the acting presidency, and get
our country moving. Sentiments have no place in this issue,” the party’s
statement read.

Presidency in hiding

The party also condemned the current situation in which Acting
President, Goodluck Jonathan, is yet to see the president since his return to
the country from Saudi Arabia, almost three months ago – even when both are
within the precinct of Aso Rock.

“The mere fact that the acting president has so far been
prevented from seeing the president is a confirmation of the fact that the
cabal holding Yar’Adua hostage is doing so for selfish reasons, rather than
acting in the interest of the President or that of the Nigerian people.

“Since Nigeria is a democracy, rather than a fiefdom, Nigerians must ignore
these Yar’Adua apologists. The members of the EXCOF (Executive Council of the
Federation) must act in accordance with the Constitution,” the statement read.

Read More stories from Source

UK resident guns for Obasanjo-Bello’s seat

UK resident guns for Obasanjo-Bello’s seat

A Nigerian legal practitioner in Diaspora, Fola Rahman, has
joined the group of aspirants seeking to contest the Ogun Central Senatorial
District in 2011.

The lawyer, who has his chambers in United Kingdom where he had
being practicing for over 15 years, said in Abeokuta at the weekend that he is
contesting under the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party {PDP} in the
state, and was sure he would win the party’s primaries.

Ogun Central Senatorial District is presently being represented
by Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello and she is known to nurse the ambition of re-contesting
the seat. Mr Rahman, however, said that was not a threat to his own ambition.

The new entrant into politics said he joined the race to
contribute his quota to the development of the country.

‘I am not afraid, I have taken courage, It is an assignment,” he said. “I
will represent well. I will make a difference in this race. We are ready and we
have being working. I want to do things that are unique.”

Mr Rahman, who said he did not have any political godfather, called on the
party leaders to ‘let the door open for everybody. If I can have break through
the door of success, we are ready to take giant steps.’

Expressing optimism on his political mission, the aspirant who was
accompanied by officials of his campaign team, said ‘a man is not blessed until
he blesses others. I joined the race to contribute my quota. I have had
discussions and coast is clear for me.’

Read More stories from Source

Lawmaker explains reason for Speaker’s removal

Lawmaker explains reason for Speaker’s removal

More revelations are coming to the fore on why the former
Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly, Taofiq Abdulsalam; his deputy,
Mayowa Akinfolarin, and other officers of the Assembly were impeached by their
colleagues two weeks ago.

The former chairman, House Committee on Information at the
Assembly, Igbekele Bolodeoku, who was guest on a television programme in Akure
on Monday, said the agreement to change the House leadership was reached at the
parliamentary session of the House.

Mr. Bolodeoku, a PDP lawmaker representing Ese-Odo constituency,
said six PDP lawmakers signed the impeachment notice before three laterbacked
out.

He said the failure of the PDP group to carry out the
impeachment was a precursor to a parliamentary meeting where the decision to
sack him was taken.

According to him, having got the signatures of 18 members, the
lawmakers decided to remove the Speaker for ineptitude and non- display of the
intelligentsia and dexterity expected of him in the handling of the House
affairs.

“It was not a PDP affair, PDP caucus alone cannot impeach the
former Speaker,” he said. “We are not enough. We have to carry everybody along.
Remember, Labour Party is intact and I addressed them in my capacity as the
House spokesman on the matter.”

He also refuted claims by PDP lawmakers that their signatures
were forged to make the impeachment exercise possible.

“During the meeting, I got signatures of seven PDP members,” he
said. “The forgery allegation is a funny story. One of them, that is Fatai
Adams Adekanye, signed it, contested for the Speaker that same morning, got six
votes, but he didn’t get to the post.”

He absolved the state governor, Olusegun Mimiko, of involvement
in the impeachment saga, saying that the former Speaker would have been
impeached eight months ago, but for the governor’s intervention.

“The governor was not involved in the impeachment, and we must
clear that. I don’t see reason for his involvement. Let me tell you, Hon.
Taofeek would have gone eight months ago, but the governor prevailed on some LP
members who refused to sign. Taofeek is doing business with the governor and
pretending to be a PDP member. I know long time ago that the chick will soon
come home to roost,” he said.

Guilty of ineptitudeness

Meanwhile, a Labour Party lawmaker in the Assembly, Olatunji
Dairo, also urged the new leadership to withdraw the official vehicles of some
legislators who refused to join their colleagues for legislation, since the
impeachment of the former Speaker, Taofiq Abdulsalam.

Some parliamentarians, under the aegis of ‘G11′, have reportedly
shunned the proceedings since penultimate Thursday because of the new
development at the Assembly.

Speaking to reporters in Akure, the state capital, Mr. Dairo,
who represents Owo Constituency II, said nobody was voted to be a Speaker when
vying for a seat at the Assembly.

“We are elected to represent our people here, even some of those
aggrieved lawmakers were not voted legitimately by the people. They rigged
elections to secure their seats”, Dairo said.

According to him, the new leadership under Samuel Adesina should
force the absentee lawmakers to drop their official cars.

He described the recent impeachment as a beautiful development.

“We effected a change with Bakita Bello after two years, and now we decided
to change the former leadership under Abdulsalam because of its ineptitude,” he
said.

Read More stories from Source

Ondo to sack computer illiterates

Ondo to sack computer illiterates

Any senior civil servant from grade level ten and above in the
Ondo State Civil Service who lacks adequate computer skills will be shown the
way out of service, the state Commissioner for Economic Planning and Budget,
Akin Adaramola, said in Akure on Monday.

Mr. Adaramola, who spoke at a four-day training programme on
information software at Igbara-Oke, Ifedore local government area of the state,
said because the world has been turned to a global village, civil servants in
the state must be computer literate to keep their jobs.

“Graduates with PHD, BSC, and HND without having any computer
knowledge should be ranked among illiterates,” he said.

He noted that for quick implementation of budget and development
in all sectors, government needs more computer literates in its ministries and
parastatals.

The workshop was organised by the state government in
collaboration with United Nations International Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. The
commissioner said graduates without good knowledge of the computer for day to
day office jobs are living in ‘fools paradise.’

“It is highly disappointing that some civil servants from grade
level ten and above cannot operate a computer. As government, we will no longer
tolerate such attitude from workers.

“The basic level of computer needs to be introduced to students
from primary schools, so that when they grow up, it would not be strange to
them,” he said.

Data for planning

Mr. Adaramola said the present government in the state strongly
believes in the importance of data for effective planning, hence the need for
its workers to be ICT compliant.

He also explained that in order to encourage its workforce on
the use of computer, the state government has introduced a system whereby all
information about the activities of the government will be sent to ministries
through email.

Mr. Adaramola assured that before the end of this year, the
state would prepare its database.

Read More stories from Source

‘Comfort at airports is my priority’

‘Comfort at airports is my priority’

Fidelia Njeze, the aviation minister on Monday declared that the
ministry will focus on enhancing comfort across airports in the country.

The minister, who made this known during her facility tour and
inspection at the Murtala Mohammed Airport (MMA), Lagos disclosed that she is
not satisfied with the state of the Lagos airport.

“The problems with the aviation industry are still there, but
we are going to concentrate on some selected areas with priority in the
enhancement of comfort at airports,” she said. “We will make sure that there is
a tangible improvement in the quality of service at our airports, especially at
our terminals.” According to Mrs. Njeze, the poor state of facilities at the
international and domestic airports will be addressed in a couple of months,
adding that the ministry will section the projects into short, medium and long
term plans.

“The work to be addressed here cannot be actualised in one week,
but we are going to make sure that during the period available to us we make
passengers comfortable whenever they visit any of Nigeria’s airports,” she
said.

“We will rectify the air conditioning systems to ensure good
temperature, and improve the toilet facilities, which actually are in a state
of decay.”

It could be recalled that NEXT on more than three occasions
reported the plights passengers face at the Lagos international airport, as a
result of dilapidated toilets, non-functional air conditioners, faulty flight
display systems as well as broken down luggage conveyor belts.

Changes soon

Mrs. Njeze, however, promised airport users that in two months
there are going to be significant changes at airports in the country,
especially the Lagos airport being the premier airport in the country.

Commenting on the incident caused by bird strikes on Dana Air
MD 83 aircraft on Monday, Mrs. Njeze disclosed that the ministry will install
additional bird scaring equipment to dispel the airborne creatures from inflicting
harm on aircraft and humans.

“The truth is that I am not satisfied with what is on ground at our
airports, but I’m happy that there are improvements like the acquisition of
fire functional tenders,” she said. “I can see three here already and I’m made
to know that seven more are on the way.”

Read More stories from Source

A half-hearted return to source

A half-hearted return to source

According to its website, the third edition of the Lagos Black
Heritage Festival (with the theme “Memory and Performance in the Return to Source”)
was conceived to “broaden and deepen the linkage between the African continent
and its Diaspora… through a focus on the lives and works of three eminent
representatives of, and close collaborators in this racial mission, all three
now ancestral figures: Aime Cesaire, Alioune Diop and Leopold Sedar Senghor.”

With this in mind, any guest at the Festival concert, which held
on the evening of Thursday, April 8, on the grounds of Oceanview Restaurant in
Victoria Island would be forgiven for arriving with outsized expectations.

Black Heritage Idols?

When I walked into the concert tent at 9.30pm, one and half
hours after the show was supposed to have started, it was devoid of seats, and
only a handful of people loitered around, a good number of them technicians.
Onstage guitarist Bez Idakula was doing a sound check. There was nothing – not
in the dismal pre-concert publicity, or in the venue’s half-hearted lighting,
or in the manner in which guests trickled in – to hint that a grand concert was
in the offing.

The show eventually kicked off at 10pm. Bez was the first act,
his performance punctuated by complaints (from him) that he couldn’t hear his
guitar onstage. After enduring the next two performances by unknown hip-hop
acts I was left wondering if this wasn’t actually an audition for a ‘Black
Heritage Idols’. One of the acts dished out lines like “Omo you dey high me /
let’s go to Miami” – totally lost on him was the irony of a “let’s go to Miami”
call in a Festival celebrating “the Return to Source.”

The next set of performances featured Jazzman Olofin, Kenny
Saint Brown and Zaaki Adzay, for me an invitation to wonder if the show wasn’t
after all a Career Resuscitation gig. (By the way, one of Olofin’s offerings
was a love song in which he crooned: “Omo o fly like helicopter… you can be my
bread let me be your toaster… I’m Jay Z will you be my Beyonce…”)

Fela on trumpet, but
without the girls

The Lagos State Governor, Babatunde Fashola walked in during Olofin’s
performance. Flutist and former PMAN President Tee Mac Itsueli mounted the
stage next. Only then, to be honest, did it seem that the festival had
commenced.

After Itsueli came the masked one, Lagbaja. As his band
assembled on stage, the talking drummer launched into a passionate intro.
Behind me someone screamed a praise name: “Omo Baba muko muko!” The
sax-clutching Lagbaja emerged from the rear of the hall, sending the crowd into
a frenzy. But he did only one full-length performance (“Never Far Away”) before
leaving the stage. Expectedly, the audience roared in displeasure; they wanted
a lot more.

At midnight, Hugh Masekela came onstage, to (in his own words)
“pay tribute to [two] great musicians from Nigeria; Orlando Julius and Fela
Kuti.” In a white buba and black trousers, trumpet in hand, his nimble energy
belied his 71 years. He recounted his first visit to Nigeria, in 1972. It was
around that time that he first met Fela, who would become an enduring
influence. Effortlessly he brought “Lady”, a Fela classic, to life. I summed up
the performance as “Fela on trumpet, but without the girls.” Masekela then
played a 1973 Orlando Julius song, ‘Mura Sise’. Admonishing the audience to
dance (“Make we stand up I beg you!”), he joked: “Some of us have had too much
iyan today and egusi; some of us don quaff some Star today…”

Twenty minutes into Masekela’s performance, Governor Fashola
decided to make his exit. Being a Governor, and this being Nigeria, there
couldn’t have been such a thing as an indiscreet exit. I wondered why Mr.
Fashola couldn’t wait for Masekela to finish his performance. But then, long
ago I resigned myself to the fact that I will never understand the ways of
Nigeria’s politicians.

After Masekela another South African band performed, and then
Nigerian R’n’B act Banky W. A gospel performance by Uche, a rousing mélange of
popular gospel melodies held together by a vigorous makossa bassline, got most
of the audience dancing.

A final performance by Masekela ended the show. In between his
passionate trumpet solos, and the occasional recourse to the sekere and metal
gong, he shared a bit about his homeland. South Africa, he told us, is one of
the “top ten drinking nations in the world”. Then an explanation. “Before 1961
the African people of South Africa were not allowed to partake of alcoholic
beverages. Because it was illegal it became a business,” he said. “I was born
in a shebeen (neighbourhood shack that housed an illegal pub) myself.”

‘Forgiving but not
forgetting’

A stirring speech by Governor Fashola, just before Masekela’s
first appearance was one of the highlights – and few saving graces – of the
concert. “We have forgiven the slave trade, but we do not forget it,” Mr.
Fashola declared, to loud agreement from the audience. “From that point of no
return, through the collaboration with our brothers and sisters in Diaspora, we
intend to make a triumphant return. A triumphant return to lead the world,
because clearly the leadership of the world has rested with what our people
have done in Europe and America; their sweat, their toil and their blood built
those economies. If they could build those economies we can rebuild the economy
and the infrastructure of Africa by working together.”

Another highlight was the fashion event, which ran alongside the
musical performances. It consisted of a fashion show by children, and a fashion
competition, “My Lagos Of Old”, which saw contesting designers put forward
retro looks created from local fabrics.

Marked by absence

But on the whole this was a Black Heritage Festival Concert
painfully marked by its lack of grandeur, and by the intimidating calibre of
its absentees. Where were Stevie Wonder, Whitney Houston, Diana Ross, Aretha
Franklin – world famous musicians whose roots are African, whose ancestors had
endured one-way Trans-Atlantic trips in slave ships centuries ago? And where
were the home-based greats of ages past and present: Victor Olaiya, Victor
Uwaifo, Fatai Rolling Dollar, Sunny Ade?

Considering the fact that the moving spirits of the festival;
Cesaire, Diop and Senghor were from Francophone Africa, certainly a Youssou
N’Dour wouldn’t have been out of place. Even the Steve Rhodes Orchestra and
Seun Kuti, mentioned in the absurdly brief promotional material (buried
somewhere in the festival brochure – there was no concert brochure) did not
turn up.

It was obvious that not much care went into putting this
festival together. The organisers, despite their deep pockets (Lagos is not
only one of the richest states in Nigeria, its annual budget would actually
dwarf that of a lot of African countries) blew an amazing – and rare –
opportunity to truly celebrate the resilience and survival of the black race,
in the face of centuries of slavery and colonialism. This could easily have
been the musical concert of the year, if not the decade. But what the
organisers did was to under-promise (the festival information mentioned only
three performers) and then under-deliver.

By the time the concert ended, at two in the morning, the audience (which to
start with hadn’t been that large; a few hundred people at the most) had
dwindled significantly. It was rather disheartening to see a 71-year-old
African music legend – whose concerts are sold out everywhere else in the world
– perform, with unflagging energy, to a mostly empty hall. How can anyone
possibly consider that a celebration of black culture?

Go to Source

Stinjinus Vesos Gridinus

Stinjinus Vesos Gridinus

If I say, “by their
names we shall know them” I am only repeating a popular catch phrase
such as “sho mi yo frend ah go tel yu hu yu bi or ah go tel yu wie yu
FO kom” and in a society as ethnicity conscious as ours, this is a
truism.

If you say names
like Kapoks and Fee, are popular in the old Bender now Edo & Delta
States, then you are dead on target. Similarly, names like Chung,
Dalyop, Plangnan, Goyol, Ritmwa, Yop, Goyol, Pam, Gwong, are uniquely
from Plateau. Should you then hear names like Hyginus, Collinus,
Romanus, Linus, Livinus, Paulinus, Istifanus, the best place to take
your mind to would be the Eastern parts of Nigeria.

This is because
while growing up, most of my friends were Igbos and bore such names,
consequently for a long time I held a mistaken belief that names that
end with “nus” were traditional to the Igbos. I was completely wrong
because I have since realised that they were Christian names made
popular by the Catholics.

This article is not
about tracing people’s origins by their names neither is it a preview
of a football match between two new club sides as the essay’s title
might suggest, far from it.

There’s no doubting
the fact that as a people, we have only adopted the English language as
a lingua franca out of compulsion. Over the years, we have held
strongly to this language as our official means of communication
without developing Pidgin as Nigeria’s natural lingua franca.

While our
traditional languages are dying we, painfully so, have many in our
midst who are still struggling to be more Catholic than the Pope. I
sympathise with them because di oyibo man de laf dem. Happily, there
are a few that truly appreciate the fact se oyibo man na oyibo man, an
no hau we wi go fit bi oyibo pas oyibo. I doff my hat to them.

Aside the
aforementioned people, there’s another silent hard working group who
have taken it as a challenge to bring dignity to Pidgin as a viable
means of communication in this country via its promotion and subsequent
development for its eventual adoption as Nigeria’s home grown official
lingua franca. I belong here.

I had just arrived
at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja from Lagos. As I
walked towards the arrival lounge, two ladies were few paces ahead of
me chattering away happily:

Sista A: I don’t know why he is behaving in a very uncooperative manner. (ah no no wai e de du sme sme)

Sista B: What did you just say (Yu se wetin?)

Sista A: You heard me right. (Yu hie mi wel )

Sista B: It’s gridiness that is worrying him (Na gridiness de wori am).

Immediately I heard
gridiness, mai maind shek and I turned to look at them without a
comment. I was worried about the word because I have always known greed
and greedy not gridines. From di smol oyibo we ah len, ah no tink se
eni wod laik greediness de. Therefore, na Pidgin.

If gridines is
Pidgin and it is commonly used as if it’s good English, it is a plus
for Pidgin. But do people who use gridiness in place of greed know the
difference?

A stingy person is
anyone who spends or gives unwillingly. In Pidgin, we simply say di
pesin de sabi du eko or he/she is selfishly economical with money.
However, in extreme cases, we say di pesin na Stinjinus. If we have
Stinjinus, why not gridinus?

Stinjinus vasos
gridinus is a battle of survival between English language and Nigerian
Pidgin and by extension Nigerian English. Therefore, to speak English
language the Nigerian way helps in Nigerianising the language thus
bringing it to awa levul. But to speak Pidgin is the real deal, no mago
mago, no beni beni.

An American named
Rudi Gaudio is a scholar currently researching into the extent to which
Nigerian Pidgin is truly helping in unifying Nigerians in Abuja, the
nation’s centre of unity. From regular discussions with him and other
whites I have found the average white man feels bad whenever a black
man de wahala imsef de won spik laik dem. It is only when you speak the
English language as a Nigerian that you will earn the respect of the
owners of the language. I once heard of how a Nigerian failed an
interview with the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and lost the
opportunity of working with the international radio station bikos e de
spik laik oyibo. Yeye man!

Stijinus and
gridinus means stingy and greedy. If you want to speak oyibo spik koret
oyibo. If yu wont to spik pidgin spik di won we don wel wel. If yu won
mix am go ahed. What is important is that you should be conscious of
when to mix, switch or mix.

No spik pidgin tink
se na oyibo or spik oyibo an no no wen yu don put pidgin. Stinjinus an
gridinus na im bi awa problem fo Naija.

God help us!

Go to Source

DEEPENING DEMOCRACY: Myth making and constitutional reform

DEEPENING DEMOCRACY: Myth making and constitutional reform

I have spent the
week in Kenya reading the active media debate on constitutional reform
as the country prepares for the referendum on a new constitution that
will take place in three months. Kenya, like Nigeria has suffered from
a long history of corruption and ethno-regional divisions within its
ruling elite. Under President Kenyatta, the Kikuyu elite reigned
supreme. When the first Vice-president Oginga Odinga, a Luo, tried to
organise an opposition party against Kenyatta in 1966, the Kenya
People’s Union (KPU), it was banned immediately and most of its MPs
were detained. It was at that time that Kenyan politics was bifurcated
between the Kikuyu and Luo and their affiliates.

The system of
patronage established by Kenyatta led to the creation of a massive
Kikuyu power elite that owed their position to the increasingly
authoritarian president. Following the death of Kenyatta in August
1978, his long time deputy, Daniel Arap Moi took over and ruled the
country for 24 years during which it became the time for the Kelenjins
from his Rift Valley constituency to enjoy economic favours.

Moi used the
opportunity of an attempted coup in 1982 to wipe out the Kikuyu elite
that had been his earlier allies. He extended despotic rule, human
rights violations and corruption in the country. As he became more and
more unpopular, state violence was organised to ensure his victory in
the 1992, 1997 and 2002 elections following the restoration of
multiparty democracy.

He however resisted
the temptation to change the Constitution to give himself a third term
in office in 2002. He backed the candidacy of Uhuru Kenyatta, son of
the previous president but his candidate was thoroughly beaten by Mwai
Kibaki, also a Kikuyu. In 2005, Kibaki orchestrated a constitutional
revision process aimed largely at enhancing his own powers. The symbol
for those in favour of the Constitution was the banana while those
opposed voted for the orange. The opposition won with 58% of the people
rejecting the Constitution and the Orange Democratic Movement was born.

The 2005 referendum
was the occasion for the revival of the Kikuyu/Luo rivalry and
politicians from both sides incited people with hate speech and not
surprisingly, the level of violence was very high.

The country went to
the polls on 27th December 2007 with Raila Odinga leading the Orange
Democratic Movement and Mwai Kibaki hoping to retain his mandate.
Following early victories by Odinga’s party, a sudden shift occurred
and the Electoral Commission announced Kibaki had won with 46.4% to
Odinga’s 44.1%. Raila and his supporters believed that they had won and
their mandate had been stolen. The result was massive violence leading
to over 1,000 people killed and 600,000 displaced from their homes.

The final outcome
is history – the invention of the power sharing agreement later adopted
by Zimbabwe in which the incumbent president remains in office and the
opposition is offered the post of prime minister as compensation. In
both cases, the international community, which negotiated the
settlements never clarified whether, it was compensation for a stolen
mandate or an inducement to keep the peace. Nonetheless, it was a
turning point for the franchise in Africa because election results were
no longer the sole basis for exercising power.

Since 2008,
negotiations for a new constitution have been on going and the draft is
finally ready. It is strongly supported by both President Kibaki and
Prime Minister Raila Odinga. The issues in the new constitution have
however been obliterated from public debate by the massive entry of
Kenyan Churches into the fray.

Under the
leadership of Rev. Peter Karanga, general-secretary of the National
Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK), Christian advocates have condemned
the draft constitution for allegedly introducing Sharia law into the
country through the kadhi court system. They argue that this alleged
introduction has elevated Islam over other religions in Kenya.

All the experts I
spoke to told me this is not strictly true. Article 170 (5) of the new
constitution says that the jurisdiction of the Kadhi courts shall be
limited to personal status, marriage, divorce or inheritance in cases
where all parties are Muslims. Indeed, the fact of the matter is that
the Kadhi courts have been in the constitution since independence. They
were part of the Lancaster House compromise under which the coastal
strip governed by the Sultan of Zanzibar became a part of Kenya in 1963.

The second issue
Christian advocates have focused on is that of abortion. They contend
that the draft constitution allows for abortion on demand which is a
recipe for killing unborn babies. What is provided for in Article 26(4)
of the new constitution however is that abortion is not permitted
unless the health or the life of the mother is in danger or there is
need for emergency treatment as may be permitted by law.

Meanwhile, the central issues of presidential powers, electoral
reform, human rights, the land question and delegation of powers to
districts have been relegated to the background as the religious
advocates redefine the debate.

Go to Source

SECTION 39: On Our Margin Too?

SECTION 39: On Our Margin Too?

Recently I watched
an agreeable bit of apocalyptic entertainment called 2012, which dealt
with the end of the world. As is common with such films, it involved
plans to save at least part of humanity from the coming Armageddon.
These centred around the G8 countries and naturally, the citizens and
artifacts that the leaders of those countries thought most important
were chosen for survival.

What was remarkable
was that there was no mention of Africa, even though one of the leading
actors in the film, Chiwetel Ejiofor, is also a Nigerian. That is, no
mention until right at the end when, with the new post-disaster
alignment of continents, the southern part of Africa was found to have
risen several thousand metres and thus was now seen to be suitable for
settlement by the survivors. It was implied that the place was empty.
(The historically alert will have noticed that we have heard this
theory of an ‘empty southern Africa’ before.)

One shouldn’t
complain of course: South America appeared in the film only so that the
collapse of Rio de Janeiro’s famous statue of Christ the Redeemer could
be shown. But at least people were shown there!

In most disaster
movie blockbusters, the fact that the only time you see a black face is
when the President of the United States is (fashionably)
African-American, is just one of the signs of how marginalised Africa
is. Perhaps we should even be glad that the notorious ‘District 9’ at
least juxtaposed the idea of Africa and Science Fiction in global
consciousness.

But if filmmakers
forget about Africa because for them, we are on the margin of their own
consciousness; what do we say about ourselves?

More specifically
what do we say about our own government which says that Africa “is the
centrepiece of our foreign policy”, and even mendaciously claims that
Africa will continue to be the centrepiece of our foreign policy!

It was not without
reason that the United States of America’s former ambassador to
Nigeria, John Campbell recently deflated our claim to be big and
important. We had not, he observed, been able to settle even the
problems erupting on our own doorstep in Niger Republic, or our
backyard in Guinea (Conakry), let alone play any meaningful role in
solving other crises on the continent, such as Darfur or Somalia.

One might, with
reason, ask how we ever could have? Our last Minister of Foreign
Affairs may have been famous (or is that notorious?) for the number of
trips he made to the US, but he only made his first official trip to
any African country in January this year when he visited some ECOWAS
countries. A further trip to Southern Africa in February hardly
suggests that there was any seriousness in the Yar’Adua administration
about Nigeria’s “concentric circles” approach to foreign policy.

According to this
policy, our foreign affairs priorities should start with our neighbours
in the inner circle, ECOWAS in the next, then Africa and last, the rest
of the world. But despite inverting these priorities and putting the US
and Britain first, Maduekwe achieved as little in those countries as
those eve-of-his-removal trips achieved in Africa.

Certainly the
visits failed to even begin to address the erosion of Nigeria’s
position and prestige in the Economic Community of West African States,
or on the continent.

While Maduekwe was
indulging himself in far-flung gallivanting, Niger Republic commenced
the construction of a dam across the River Niger that could reduce the
flow of water into Kainji Dam by as much as 70%! And despite this open
disregard for our interests, Nigeria not only watched helplessly as
President Mahmadou Tandja subverted his country’s constitution, but
when he was called to order and removed with no input from us, could
only join a chorus of demands that Niger conduct elections within six
months without any apparent concern about the posture that a
newly-elected Nigerién President might adopt towards us.

There will be those
who try to convince themselves that Acting President Goodluck
Jonathan’s trip to the US last week has done Nigeria some good; as if
Jonathan has not heard from his fellow-citizens that he needs to tackle
electoral reform and punish corruption, or as though he was there to do
much more than make up the numbers when US President Barack Obama met
him in a group of ten (!) to discuss the control and safeguarding of
nuclear materials.

But in our own
neighbourhood, a measure of our inconsequence was epitomized by the
remarks of Libya’s Muammar Ghadaffi who, whatever peace he may have
made with the West still feels free to stir up mischief in Africa (of
which he seems to see himself as some kind of uncrowned king) about
breaking up Nigeria. He even cheekily suggested that ex-President
Olusegun Obasanjo should oversee the process of creating the ‘Christian
South’ without any response from Obasanjo!

It would be a good idea for us to realise that nobody is going to
pull our African chestnuts out of the fire for us, even if we are to
abandon the concentric circles approach. And however much we intend to
outsource to the US, we are still going to have to get our own foreign
policy.

Go to Source