Nigeria Content Online

As the Holy Books direct we rejoice with those rejoicing. We
rejoice with the rank and file of Nigerian journalists on the July 18th release
of their four colleagues and their driver kidnapped a week earlier in Abia
State. We rejoice with the victims’ nuclear families that were spared the agony
of becoming widows and orphans.

We rejoice with President Goodluck Jonathan for seeing his
directive heeded that the journalists’ freedom be secured. We rejoice with
Police Inspector General Ogbonna Onovo that his ‘people’ have heeded his pleas
and allowed him to keep his job. We also rejoice with the five kidnapped men
for living to narrate their disorienting experience of being blindfolded daily
and moved constantly around, feeding on a monotonous diet of bread, insults and
threats.

As time begins the healing process their one week loss of
freedom in Abia’s rain forest leaves some telling lessons. These include the
awareness that freedom is sweet, journalism comes with privileges, governance
must connect with the people, and crime must be punished.

Since Monday, the media have been awash with images of relief
and joy on the faces of the victims and their families. These images contrast
the morose looks of the previous week when the media in a case of concerted interest
advertised the grief and sorrow of the victims’ families with compelling
visuals and reports that defined the coverage of the kidnap. The coverage was
so effective a visitor to Nigeria may be forgiven for thinking journalists were
the first set of people to be kidnapped in Nigeria. Some commentators have even
branded the coverage, abuse of access while others feared it could even
endanger the victims’ lives.

Thankfully, subsequent developments have not justified the
fears. On the charge of abused access, I think the journalists simply lived up
to their calling. Accounts of kidnaps have often been lacking in detail
principally because the victims and their families shy away from public
pronouncements beyond thanking heavenly forces for their release. Even when the
media suspect that ransom payments accounted for the rising cases of kidnap,
they could not say so categorically.

The kidnap this time thus afforded the media opportunity to
deepen kidnap reporting. Rather than chase scared, reluctant, and usually
anonymous victim-sources for the necessary leads to write informed articles,
the media found in the plight of their colleagues the occasion to humanise the
reports by conveying the enormity of the grief suffered by the victims’
families. By so doing, the media put faces and voices to the menace that
kidnapping causes.

They showed weeping wives, dishevelled relations, and troubled
citizens. For every report and image published on the plight of the journalists
the media spoke for those who have passed through similar situations, and those
who may well face such challenges. The media reports provoked active state
interest and intervention. The President challenged the police; the Police high
command relocated its operational headquarters to Abia, threatening fire and
brimstone. Abia State Governor Theodore Orji suddenly woke up to communal
relations, challenging the communities to give up the merchants of terror.

Rather than abused access, what the media demonstrated was
privileged access.

Traditionally, the media serve society as purveyors of
information, discussing the human condition, identifying heroes and villains,
the knowledgeable and the ignorant, the bold and the timid, the beautiful and
the ugly, the important and the trivial. Often, these accounts are about other
members of society as journalism training expects its disciples to report and
not make news. Occasionally, where its members’ direct experience will amplify
meaning, journalism permits the reporter to play the newsmaker.

In this instance, the kidnapped men were reluctant newsmakers,
their families, accidental headline grabbers. From their one-week detention, we
have learnt that the kidnappers are young men in their prime, who attribute
their new vocation to lack of jobs or business opportunities and an eagerness
to avoid the dimming of their future by visionless governance.

Since the kidnap of the journalists is just a chapter in the
larger story of insecurity of life and property, focus must return to what
still needs to be done to ensure security in our cities, towns and villages.
Good governance is not an option. It is the reason for being in office.
Governor Orji’s engagement with the communities must be sustained; people of
questionable characters must be probed, indicted citizens prosecuted fairly.

The virtues of consultation, cooperation and communication in
governance all over the country must be promoted; consultation on communal
needs and policy formulation, cooperation on executing public policies and
programmes and regular communication of prospects and problems must be
followed. Conditions for gainful employment must be created, diligence,
rewarded and indolence, punished.

Corruption must be curtailed. The police must be restructured
and better equipped for organisational efficiency.

Lastly, in this age of electronic money transfer, it is strange that our
journalists were moving around with millions in cash, reportedly snatched by
their abductors. It does little credit to our intelligence or to our
reputation.

Days ago, the president of the Air Transport
Services Senior Staff Association of Nigeria revealed an open secret:
Nigeria has been unable to achieve Category One status, which is a
higher level of air travel capacity that certifies our ability to fly
directly from Nigeria to the United States of America, hence saving
travellers the stress of flying from Nigeria to another country in
order to get a flight to America.

According to the union leader, this is as a result of “the high level of deficiencies” in the country’s aviation sector.

The Nigerian airline industry is severely
strained. Operators and regulators continue to dance around this
reality, but it is the fact. The woes of Virgin
Nigeria-turned-Nigerian-Eagle-turned-Air-Nigeria still got wide
attention, but they were only a tip of the iceberg. All our domestic
airlines are labouring -from Aero Contractors, to Bellview to
Chanchangi, they continue to complain about debts that choke operations.

For at least half a decade and three aviation
ministers in between the industry has been awaiting a N10billion
government bailout package.

On top of their indebtedness, and concerns about
safety airlines with IATA certification operate under the constant fear
of de-certification, and the uncertain business environment full of
other players champing at the bit to take over the industry.

“They are positioning Arik as a national carrier
but the truth of the matter is that Arik is not a national carrier,”
Benjamin Okewu, the union leader, said to the press for instance. “It
is a flag carrier and there is no way you can attain Category one
without having a national carrier and we have made it known to the
government. This is actually painful no matter how they look at it.”
Arik Air indeed has severally been referred to as the nation’s most
successful domestic airline, but further inspection reveals a different
story. A joint action of the NCAA and the Nigerian Airspace Management
Agency (NAMA), in June 2010, temporarily halted the operations of Arik
Air and IRS airlines over issues of non-remittance of charges.

The grounding of the two airlines by a task force
came as a result of monies owed over a long period. According to this
newspaper’s source, Arik Air was said to be indebted by almost N1.8
billion on the domestic routes, and about $126,000 on the international
route. Airlines are supposed to statutorily deduct five percent of
ticket fees for remittance to agencies.

Apart from Arik, 17 other carriers were said to be
owing up to N5 billion, being accumulated ticket sales charges
collected from passengers but not remitted to the agencies Aero was
said to owe almost a billion naira and Bellview, almost N300 million.

The bottom-line is that we are fiddling while Rome
burns. Our government and corporate players are playing games with the
aviation sector. Instead of taking the time to do things right we keep
looking for shortcuts.

The problems are plenty. There are the
longstanding allegations of corruption in the Federal Airports
Authority of Nigeria, unlawful interference by the current minister of
aviation on behalf of erring airlines, proper and thorough
certification by the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority amongst others.
The lack of professionalism in our system showed itself in the fact
that the NCAA obviously failed to carry out a thorough certification of
airlines in the country before it invited officials from the
International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and the United State
Federal Aviation Authority (US FAA) to Nigeria last week to examine the
issue of Category One Status.

Then there are smaller issues. Why has the airport
authority refused to install airfield lighting at the 18L (18left)
runway of MMA for over three years? Why is its payroll bloated with
consultants? Why are airlines still unable to break even, barely
struggling to survive despite persistent increase in charges?

Some solutions have been proffered.

The ‘Presidential sub-committee on solutions to
challenges facing the airline industry in Nigeria’ examined 10 critical
areas of the sector – high operating cost, aviation fuel,
infrastructure at the airports and air space, multiple tariffs and
charges, training and Central Bank of Nigeria Forex policy – and warned
of consequences should the government ignore its report.

The report included advice that the government
should provide “scheduled domestic airlines special airline financing
assistance in form of long term soft loans from under the Nigeria
Airline Industry Review Action-Fund recommended to be established by
the Federal Government with Nigerian banks.” The imperative of this is
clear. A viable airline industry will boost economic activities in
Nigeria but when the ‘Giant of Africa’ is unable to provide effective
and safe airline services, and continues to have severe structural
challenge within its financial service industry this is not likely to
happen.

Let’s stop deceiving ourselves. The nation cannot afford another series of air crashes. 2005 was only five years ago.

A calamitous
national occurence was casually under-reported as a human interest or
crime story by some newspapers last week. It should have been the stuff
of screaming headlines and angry, editorials Fifty year-old Shuaibu
Atanda is a father of six hired by the Lagos University Teaching
Hospital to evacuate the bodies of dead babies on a contractual basis.
He was arrested on July 3 in the outskirts of Lagos with five
Ghana-must-go bags containing the corpses of 76 dead babies he was
contracted to bury at Atan Cemetery. Here are the gruesome details from
the proverbial horse’s mouth:

“I am a private
contractor with LUTH and I have been helping the department of Morbid
Anatomy to clear unclaimed babies corpses for the past two years. The
corpses the police found with me are corpses for the months of March
and April – 40 corpses for March and 36 corpses for April. I was
supposed to bury the corpses at the Atan Cemetery at Yaba but I was
financially down because I have used almost all the money I requested
from the hospital to bribe the people working at the Morbid and Anatomy
Department.

“I also bribed
people at the account department. I gave one Mr Abraham Ekohmi, the
unit head of the Morbid Department, N50,000; I gave one Mr Everest,
40,000 and two staff of the accounts department 10,000 each, so that I
can continue with my job. The money I charged the hospital for my
service is N185,000 and it was Mr. Ekhomi that inflated it to that
amount. After settling all of them, I was left with nothing to bury the
corpses at the Atan Cemetery at Yaba, because they were demanding
N90,000 for each month from me before they will collect the corpses.
Since I did not have the N90,000, I decided to help myself by taking
the corpses to a bush at Agbowa to bury them. It was because I have to
bribe my way that was why I could not afford the cemetery fees.” It is
tragic that this story had zero shelf life in our newspapers.

Subscribers to the
various – and increasingly visible Nigerian Internet listservs such as
Naijapolitics, Talknigeria, NIDOA, and Nigerianworldforum – even tried,
as we say in Naija-speak. Because most of them are based in
Euro-America and are part of the social regimes of national shock and
outrage that would have greeted the idea of seventy-six dead babies
discovered in bags in Britain, Canada, or the USA, they screamed for
about two or three days before that thread was forgotten. However, some
of the commentators went the predictable way of a knee-jerk
condemnation of Mr. Shuaibu Atanda. As far as I know, only Mr.
Ibukunolu Alao Babajide, an Arusha-based lawyer and a prominent member
of the Nigerian Internet community, offered reassuring perspectives on
the broader national and systemic implications of the tragedy.

Mr. Shuaibu Atanda
is one of those honest and hard working Nigerians who should be on the
national honours list as opposed to the extant culture of crowding the
worthless list with scurrilous members of the political status quo
whose only qualification for national honours is the fact that they
have been able to steal a couple of billions from the Nigerian people.
Mr. Atanda belongs in the class of those little dispossessed people who
not only bear the brunt of the visionlessness of the morons in the
rulership in Abuja but who also have to clean up after them.

When you turn your
University teaching hospitals to baby death factories (LUTH even has to
hire private contractors to evacuate the tons of dead babies they
manufacture!); when whatever is left of structure has, in turn, been so
corroded by corruption that even the roadside contractor hired to do
the job is unable to afford regular cemetery fees, why arrest and
criminalise him for taking the initiative to bury the bodies somewhere
else in the oustskirts of Lagos? None of the reports – including police
accounts – has indicated so far that he was doing anything untoward
with the bodies at the time of arrest.

The dead babies,
LUTH, and Mr. Shuaibu Atanda are all victims of the criminals in our
rulership. They should be held squarely responsible for the bigger
picture. It is infuriating to note that the same criminals who cannot
provide health care of Burkina Faso standards to Nigerians are the ones
now planning to steal N6.5 billion in the name of their yeye
independence anniversary later this year.

Shock is dead in
Nigeria. If Nigerians at home have lost the capacity to be shocked, as
the fact that the idea of seventy-six dead babies in Ghana-must-go bags
only registered as an imperceptible blip in national discourse,
shouldn’t our obtuse rulers at least pretend that they still care?

What, in the name of God, are Ken Wiwa, Oronto Douglas, and Ima
Niboro doing in Aso Rock? These are gentlemen who ought to know how
these things are done. These are gentlemen who ought to be able to tell
Oga Jonathan that when 76 Nigerian babies are found in Ghana-must-go
bags, there must be a comforting statement from the presidency. As for
Dimeji Bankole and David Mark, well, they were partying in Lucky
Igbinedion’s mansion in South Africa. Seventy-six dead Nigerian babies
aren’t enough to make them interrupt their faaji and rush to Abuja to
call for special hearings! Na so we see am.

In March of 2000, Pat Buchanan came to speak at
Harvard University’s Institute of Politics. Harvard being Harvard, the audience
hissed and sneered and made wisecracks. Buchanan being Buchanan, he gave as
good as he got. While the assembled Ivy Leaguers accused him of homophobia and
racism and anti-Semitism, he accused Harvard – and by extension, the entire
American elite – of discriminating against white Christians.

A decade later, the note of white grievance that
Buchanan struck that night is part of the conservative melody.

You can hear it when Glenn Beck accuses Barack
Obama of racism, or when Rush Limbaugh casts liberal policies as an exercise in
“reparations.” It was sounded last year during the backlash against Sonia
Sotomayor’s suggestion that a “wise Latina” jurist might have advantages over a
white male judge, and again last week when conservatives attacked the Justice
Department for supposedly going easy on members of the New Black Panther Party
accused of voter intimidation.

To liberals, these grievances seem at once
noxious and ridiculous. (Is there any group with less to complain about, they
often wonder, than white Christian Americans?) But to understand the country’s
present polarisation, it’s worth recognizing what Pat Buchanan got right.

Last year, two Princeton sociologists, Thomas
Espenshade and Alexandria Walton Radford, published a book-length study of
admissions and affirmative action at eight highly selective colleges and universities.
Unsurprisingly, they found that the admissions process seemed to favor black
and Hispanic applicants, while whites and Asians needed higher grades and SAT
scores to get in. But what was striking, as Russell K. Nieli pointed out last
week on the conservative website Minding the Campus, was which whites were most
disadvantaged by the process: the downscale, the rural and the working-class.

This was particularly pronounced among the
private colleges in the study. For minority applicants, the lower a family’s
socioeconomic position, the more likely the student was to be admitted. For
whites, though, it was the reverse. An upper-middle-class white applicant was
three times more likely to be admitted than a lower-class white with similar
qualifications.

This may be a money-saving tactic. In a footnote,
Espenshade and Radford suggest that these institutions, conscious of their
mandate to be multiethnic, may reserve their financial aid dollars “for
students who will help them look good on their numbers of minority students,”
leaving little room to admit financially strapped whites.

But cultural biases seem to be at work as well.
Nieli highlights one of the study’s more remarkable findings: While most extracurricular
activities increase your odds of admission to an elite school, holding a
leadership role or winning awards in organizations like high school ROTC, 4-H
clubs and Future Farmers of America actually works against your chances.
Consciously or unconsciously, the gatekeepers of elite education seem to incline
against candidates who seem too stereotypically rural or right wing or “Red
America.”

This provides statistical confirmation for what
alumni of highly selective universities already know. The most underrepresented
groups on elite campuses often aren’t racial minorities; they’re working-class
whites (and white Christians in particular) from conservative states and
regions.

Inevitably, the same under representation
persists in the elite professional ranks these campuses feed into: in law and
philanthropy, finance and academia, the media and the arts.

This breeds paranoia, among elite and non-elites
alike. Among the white working class, increasingly the most reliable Republican
constituency, alienation from the American meritocracy fuels the kind of racially
tinged conspiracy theories that Beck and others have exploited – that Barack
Obama is a foreign-born Marxist hand-picked by a shadowy liberal cabal, that a
Wall Street-Washington axis wants to flood the country with third world immigrants,
and so forth.

Among the highly educated and liberal, meanwhile,
the lack of contact with rural, working-class America generates all sorts of
wild anxieties about what’s being plotted in the heartland. In the Bush years, liberals
fretted about a looming evangelical theocracy. In the age of the Tea Parties,
they see crypto-Klansmen and budding Timothy McVeighs everywhere they look.

This cultural divide has been widening for years,
and bridging it is beyond any institution’s power. But it’s a problem
admissions officers at top-tier colleges might want to keep in mind when
they’re assembling their freshman classes.

If such universities are trying to create an
elite as diverse as the nation it inhabits, they should remember that there’s
more to diversity than skin color – and that both their school and their
country might be better off if they admitted a few more ROTC (Reserve Officer
Training Corps) cadets, and a few more aspiring farmers.

© 2010 New
York Times News Service

The iron horse
features significantly in Igbo narratives, connecting with notions of
wealth, poverty, power, modernity, security, and interpersonal
relationships in a changing society. Transliterated from the Igbo
“anyinya igwe” (for the English word “bicycle”), iron horse represents
a people’s perception of the convergence of the familiar and the
unfamiliar, the natural and the invented Indeed, as a signifier, its
meanings keep shifting. For instance, while owning an iron horse was an
indication of great wealth and being in tune with modernity (or
culturally being with the oyibo), having it instead of a car in the
modern Igbo society is viewed as a sign of abject poverty. Little
wonder that the Mobylette, with its combination of the features of the
iron horse and the conventional motorcycle, was nicknamed “M zuru m ike
igwe” (May I take a rest from bicycle riding). Is it not astonishing
that one who also wants to take a rest from car driving in contemporary
Nigerian society and decides to ride an iron horse to church or work
becomes an object of ridicule? How so soon we forget!

The iron horse once
mattered. It was class, especially if it was the brand called “White
Horse”. Ride a White horse and the whole village would bow. In those
days, a suitor wishing to impress would look for someone in his village
who had a White Horse and beg him with some drinks to accompany him to
see his in-laws. That was a strategic impression management. As the
Igbo would say: “O gbajuo n’elu, o rute ndi no n’ala” (when the wine
keg fills to the brim up there, the wine will surely trickle down to
those below).

The owner of an
iron horse might not know how to ride it. The most important thing was
that he possessed an iron horse. Sometimes he would dress up for a
ceremony and since the iron horse must accompany him to boost his
image, he would roll it all the way to where he was going; or,
alternatively, someone would have to roll it behind him. And when he
eventually learned how to ride it, someone would always have to hold
the metal animal while he mounted.

It was part of the
homage to both the beast and its powerful rider. If wishes were iron
horses, those that held them for others to mount might ride! Well, it
seemed that when poor villagers were eventually able to buy their own
iron horse, its integrity suffered. Perhaps, this entry of the poor
into the circle of iron horse riders led to the introduction of a
bicycle license. If the poor must join in riding, they must regularly
pay for doing so.

The local council
had special license officials deployed like today’s police on the
roads. As would be expected, the local people needed to be wary if
their iron horse licenses had expired. An iron horse license official
could spoil someone’s journey by mounting a roadblock where it was not
expected.

Trust people in my
village for being their brothers’ and sisters’ keepers: those who
successfully passed iron horse license checkpoints always tried to
alert others that “onye akika agba” (literally, a person that carved up
someone’s jowl) was somewhere around the bend.

It was considered a
calamity to lose one’s iron horse to thieves. Even as the poor and the
nonliterate wanted to progress to by climbing out of poverty onto the
saddle of wealth, they also had to wrestle with the prevailing
structures of power, criminality, injustice, and a Eurocentric justice
system.

Seven Seven,
popularly known among his Igbo fans as “Okonkwo Asaa,” will always be
remembered for his musical narrative about Long John and his iron
horse. Long John in Okonkwo Asaa’s story is a stark illiterate who,
desiring to enjoy the things of modern technology and also to reduce
the suffering occasioned by trekking, decides to purchase an iron
horse. In his innocence, he fails to ask the seller for a receipt,
little knowing that the seller, like many dubious business people, is
determined to show him, a mumu, that “Na guy wack.” The seller raises
an alarm after Long John has paid and departed with the iron horse,
claiming that someone has stolen an iron horse from his shop. Long John
is arrested by the police and being unable to produce either the
receipt of the purchase or a witness, is detained. But he would not
give up: as a firm believer in tradition and poetic justice, he invites
the road, the mango tree on the road, as well as his ancestors, to be
his witnesses, with the police mocking and scolding him for being out
of tune with modern ways of justice.

The seller begins
the trip back to his shop with the recovered iron horse, rejoicing that
he has demonstrated astute business intelligence. But, either out of
recklessness occasioned by the excitement over his cleverness or the
quick intervention of the witnesses summoned by Long John, the iron
horse dealer is knocked down by a car and he dies instantly. The
bicycle falls beside the mango tree mentioned by Long John as one of
his witnesses. The police officers are so shocked and terrified at the
turn of events that they quickly release Long John and hand over the
iron horse to him.

Like Long John, I am back on my iron horse, riding to work in a
postcolonial Nigerian society where one has to construct one’s
importance and travel to power using a “special” vehicle.

The latest hot
political topic is the “Obama paradox” – the supposedly mysterious
disconnect between the president’s achievements and his numbers. The
line goes like this: The administration has had multiple big victories
in Congress, most notably on health reform, yet President Barack
Obama’s approval rating is weak. What follows is speculation about
what’s holding his numbers down: He’s too liberal for a center-right
nation. No, he’s too intellectual, too Mr. Spock, for voters who want
more passion. And so on.

But the only real
puzzle here is the persistence of the pundit delusion, the belief that
the stuff of daily political reporting – who won the news cycle, who
had the snappiest comeback – actually matters.

This delusion is,
of course, most prevalent among pundits themselves, but it’s also
widespread among political operatives. And I’d argue that
susceptibility to the pundit delusion is part of the Obama
administration’s problem.

What political
scientists, as opposed to pundits, tell us is that it really is the
economy, stupid. Today, Ronald Reagan is often credited with godlike
political skills – but in the summer of 1982, when the U.S. economy was
performing badly, his approval rating was only 42 percent.

My Princeton
colleague Larry Bartels sums it up as follows: “Objective economic
conditions – not clever television ads, debate performances, or the
other ephemera of day-to-day campaigning – are the single most
important influence upon an incumbent president’s prospects for
re-election.” If the economy is improving strongly in the months before
an election, incumbents do well; if it’s stagnating or retrogressing,
they do badly.

Now, the fact that “ephemera” don’t matter seems reassuring, suggesting that voters aren’t swayed by cheap tricks.

Unfortunately,
however, the evidence suggests that issues don’t matter either, in part
because voters are often deeply ill informed.

Suppose, for
example, that you believed claims that voters are more concerned about
the budget deficit than they are about jobs. (That’s not actually true,
but never mind.) Even so, how much credit would you expect Democrats to
get for reducing the deficit?

None. In 1996
voters were asked whether the deficit had gone up or down under Bill
Clinton. It had, in fact, plunged – but a plurality of voters, and a
majority of Republicans said it had risen.

There’s no point
berating voters for their ignorance: people have bills to pay and
children to raise, and most don’t spend their free time studying fact
sheets. Instead, they react to what they see in their own lives and the
lives of people they know. Given the realities of a bleak employment
picture, Americans are unhappy – and they’re set to punish those in
office.

What should Obama
have done? Some political analysts, like Charlie Cook, say he made a
mistake by pursuing health reform, that he should have focused on the
economy. As far as I can tell, however, these analysts aren’t talking
about pursuing different policies – they’re saying that he should have
talked more about the subject. But what matters is actual economic
results.

The best way for
Obama to have avoided an electoral setback this fall would have been
enacting a stimulus that matched the scale of the economic crisis.
Obviously, he didn’t do that. Maybe he couldn’t have passed an
adequate-sized plan, but the fact is that he didn’t even try. True,
senior economic officials reportedly downplayed the need for a really
big effort, in effect overruling their staff; but it’s also clear that
political advisers believed that a smaller package would get more
friendly headlines, and that the administration would look better if it
won its first big congressional test.

In short, it looks
as if the administration itself was taken in by the pundit delusion,
focusing on how its policies would play in the news rather than on
their actual impact on the economy.

Republicans, by the
way, seem less susceptible to this delusion. Since Obama took office,
they have engaged in relentless obstruction, obviously unworried about
how their actions would look or be reported. And it’s working: by
blocking Democratic efforts to alleviate the economy’s woes, the GOP is
helping its chances of a big victory in November.

Can Obama do
anything in the time that remains? Midterm elections, where turnout is
crucial, aren’t quite like presidential elections, where the economy is
all. Obama’s best hope at this point is to close the “enthusiasm gap”
by taking strong stands that motivate Democrats to come out and vote.
But I don’t expect to see that happen.

What I expect,
instead, if and when the midterms go badly, is that the usual suspects
will say that it was because Obama was too liberal – when his real
mistake was doing too little to create jobs.

© 2010 New York Times News Service

The case of Nigeria
is like the proverbial table of thieves, where there is no honour. The
new threat facing every Nigerian lies in the Eastern parts where one
stands the risk of being kidnapped once one is ‘perceived’ to be doing
well.

The government’s
response has been, to put it mildly, worrisome. Government officials
have inadvertently ‘settled’ these hostage takers in what might seem
like an attempt to appease those that are angered by their pilferage of
our resources and their high level of corruption.

The four
journalists that were kidnapped recently have enraged the public. The
President has read a riot act to the Inspector General to get to the
root of the matter but that for me is simply grandstanding. The issue
of kidnappings in Nigeria is actually a morality issue and nothing more.

From the first time
it came to public knowledge in the Niger-Delta, where expatriates and
foreigners were being kidnapped, government’s reaction to the mishaps
was pathetic. While in well-developed Nations, you hear government
officials saying things like, “We do not negotiate with hostage takers
or kidnappers,” in Nigeria the case is different.

And the reason is simple: Among thieves, there is no honour.

How can a man (the
principal thief), who has looted and stolen billions of money by any
means necessary, ask another (the subordinate thief) who has done what
he can within his power, not to steal by any other means? In this case
all the principal thief will be able to do is tell the subordinate not
to get caught.

So when the first
incident about the kidnapped expatriates was widely reported in the
media both locally and internationally, government officials felt
obliged to give the kidnappers what they demanded under the flimsy
excuse that they wanted to preserve Nigeria’s already bashed image.

So now the
Niger-Delta goons have set the pace and opened the warped eye of the
youngsters and desperate fast-lane money seekers to the gains of
kidnapping, only that this time around they no longer kidnap
foreigners, who now move amidst heavy security, but have turned their
gaze to their fellow brothers and sisters in the absence of the
white-skinned walking gold mines.

And what will the government officials do about this? Settle every single one of them!

And as time goes
on, more and more youths will resolve to the fast paced, money making
trade of taking hostages and kidnapping, after all they too are staking
a claim to their portion of the National cake

Little wonder why
so many people are trooping out of the country, even though many are
leaving for the façade they call ‘greener pastures’, there are also
some leaving because they perceive genuinely the danger ahead – but
they have the means. And that leaves the helpless innocents that don’t
have anywhere else to call home except here. The entire Nigerian
society is in grave danger.

Some might say I am
being unnecessarily paranoid but let me give those people a little
illustration of what I am talking about. Let’s go back to 1999 after
the triumphant death of the late dictator Sani Abacha and the
successful transition to civil rule. Where the AD held sway in the West
and through such factors as a track record and simplicity, a certain
former school principal was elected governor in one of the southwest
states.

Prior to that time,
this man used to drive a rickety old Peugeot 504 Salon car and was
often assisted by his neighbours every morning to jump-start his car.
But after about six months of being governor, this man had moved from
grass to grace. He bought a fleet of new luxury cars, built houses in
prime areas in the state and as well as in neighbouring states and sent
all his children abroad, forgetting the school he once headed as
principal.

I am sure this
story is not new to many Nigerians as this has been the case with many
top government officials. But here, a picture is being painted; a way
of life is been carved. Where are our values?

Though the
ex-governor in question is an old man now, what do you think he has
taught his children? What do you think he has taught his children’s
friends? It’s all a ripple effect.

Let’s all be honest
with each other. The armed robber or kidnapper is a man with a dual
personality. Firstly, he is your neighbour you see on your street as
you drive out to work. He is the man you see pushing his broken down
vehicle along the road. He could be the school principal going to
school early in the morning. He could be anyone. We must all be
responsible for each other. We must be responsible for our dear country.

I am sure so many
people that will read this piece also know a similar story of a man
that became a politician. They are the ones that set the precedent;
they are the ones that first kidnapped public funds, taxpayers’ money.
Every other event is a ripple effect that we caused when we kept quiet
and watched, waiting for a time we too would be in government.

I for one am not
disillusioned about government doing a thing, after all they are the
same: the man who steals with a pen, the man who steals with a gun is
what we call a thief and there is no honour amongst thieves.

I believe Nigeria will survive and the truth will prevail above all
things but I enjoin Nigerians to take responsibility and start to look
inwards – that’s the only way. If everyone changes, Nigeria will change
as a whole.