Archive for nigeriang

States assemblies hold ace in amendment process

States assemblies hold ace in amendment process

Not often are they called upon to
deliberate on matters of much significance to the country. Now,
legislators in the 36 states have found themselves in the sun. They
have to agree to the amendment of the 1999 constitution recently sent
to them by the National Assembly and they are making the best of the
opportunity.

Some have quickly assented to the
changes. Others are digging in their heels and subjecting the document
to a thorough debate. According to the law, any part of the
constitution can be amended if 2/3 of the country’s state legislatures
say so. A state may, therefore, reject a part of the proposed amendment
but may not get the necessary support from other states to stop the
change being made.

On the whole, the amendment bill has met uneven reception. Below is the status of the bill in some state legislatures.

Ondo

Over 500 memoranda on the bill were
presented at the public hearing and the process is still on. At the
public hearing, issues on the financial autonomy of the national and
state assemblies, age and qualification of contestants for elective
positions and cross-carpeting of politicians from one political party
to the other, were treated. The Speaker of the Assembly, Samuel
Adesina, said only contentious issues out of the 506 memorandum
received from the public would be considered.

Kebbi

The House of Assembly has constituted a
five-member committee to recommend areas to be reviewed in the
harmonised draft bill on the amendment of the 1999 Constitution. The
Speaker, Aminu Musa, while inaugurating the committee last Wednesday
called on members to hasten action, with a view to making meaningful
contributions in the ongoing constitution review.

Yobe

The Yobe State House of Assembly
rejected the proposed amendment of section 65 of the constitution,
which deals with the minimum educational qualification for election
into the assemblies. The assembly voted against the proposal at a
special sitting in Damaturu, saying the review would not solve the
problems associated with elections in Nigeria.

Sirajo Wakil, the Deputy Majority Leader of the assembly, said its position was based on the views of the people.

“Our argument on section 65 which deals
with qualification is that the amended section failed to give fair and
level playing ground to Nigerians,” he said.

Lagos

The National Assembly’s proposed
amendment of the 1999 Constitution was not well received at a public
hearing organised by the Lagos State House of Assembly on Monday June
20, 2010. The general response from participants was that “the
amendment does not meet the yearnings of Nigerians.”

Gombe

In Gombe, the assembly on Wednesday
also announced its objection to the proposal to raise the academic
qualification of political aspirants from the secondary school
certificates to a college diploma.

The assembly approved 27 proposed amendments and rejected 21.

The Speaker, Manga Bojude, said among
the rejected amendments were the sections dealing with the educational
qualification of candidates and section 106, which provides for
independent candidates in elections. The House also rejected section
190, which empowers the vice-president or deputy governor to act on
behalf of the president or governor after any leave that is beyond 21
working days.

The removal of section 66 of the
constitution, which empowers state governors to form disciplinary
committees to handle cases of misconduct against political office
holders was also rejected.

Adamawa

The Adamawa State Assembly adopted the
amendment bill, but rejected financial autonomy contained in the bill.
The lawmakers, in their sitting on Wednesday, voted 10 against six and
nine against eight respectively to reject the alteration of section 81
and section 121 respectively that guaranteed financial autonomy to
INEC, legislatures and judiciaries at the national and state levels.

It also unanimously rejected the
provisions for independent candidacy and the pegging of diploma as
minimum qualification for candidates seeking elective offices.

Edo

The Edo House of Assembly also on
Wednesday rejected 14 of the 41 sections of the Constitution as amended
by the National Assembly. It rejected the amendment to the Sixth
Schedule of the Constitution but supported a proposal which would make
it legal for a serving legislator to move from the political party on
which he was elected to another political party without forfeiting his
seat. The proposal by the National Assembly to transfer Sections 221 to
227 to the Electoral Act was also upheld by the legislators.

Ekiti

Most members of the Ekiti House of
Assembly on Tuesday described the content of the amendment bill as
fraudulent. Sections 65 (A) and 68 (1) G concerning upward review of
qualification of persons that could contest elective positions as well
as cross-carpeting were some of the contentious issues. Lawmakers also
opposed cross-carpeting and voted against it. Some argued that
approving such an amendment was capable of turning Nigeria into a one
party state.

Plateau

The Plateau House of Assembly is still
planning to convene a stakeholders’ meeting to deliberate on the
harmonised copy of the amended constitution.

“We have received a copy of the harmonised version of the amended
constitution and shall have a public hearing to make inputs into the
document,’’ the Speaker, Istifanus Mwansat, said at plenary on Monday
in Jos.

Read More stories from Source

Bureau overwhelmed with false asset declarations

Bureau overwhelmed with false asset declarations

The Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB)
is presently overwhelmed with petitions from members of the public
alleging false declarations of assets against some federal and state
public office holders, NEXT has learnt.

Despite the fact that Nigeria’s
law does not permit the public declaration and revelation of assets of
public servants, a deluge of petitions from citizens who know what some
public servants secretly declared as assets are being forwarded to the
CCB on daily basis, revealing hidden facts and figures.

Efforts made to find out how many
of such petitions have been received were unfruitful, as the Bureau
refused to give out the details.

Also, the names and positions of
public office holders accused of false declarations of assets could not
be confirmed, no thanks to the unwillingness by CCB officials to speak,
against the provision of the CCB Act.

But sources at the bureau claimed
that petitions on false declarations of assets were increasing daily
and that only its management have access to the petitions.

Verify false declarations

However, Sam Saba, the Chairman of
the Code of Conduct Bureau, last week at a two-day public enlightenment
programme in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, organised for state and local
government officials by the Bureau and the Rivers State government,
gave an indication of the situation confronting the anti-corruption
agency.

The programme had the theme,
“Ethics, Code of Conduct and the Pride of the Public Officers”. Mr Saba
said that plans were underway to constitute a 25-man team of the Bureau
officers across the country to investigate petitions received relating
to asset declarations.

He added that the committee will
move from state to state, collating petitions, and investigating them
with a view to ascertaining the truth or falsity in the declarations.

He reminded public servants that
were either elected or appointed recently and others, that keeping
foreign accounts after taking public office is tantamount to a breach
of the code of conduct for public officers.

Murtala Adebayo Sanni, the
Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, advocated a strong political
will and legislative reforms to ensure the prosecution of corrupt
public officials, serving or out of office. Mr Sanni also highlighted
the punishments the tribunal is empowered to impose on a public officer
found guilty of contravening the Code of Conduct for public officers.
They include: the payment of fines, vacation of office, and
disqualification from holding public office for a period up to 10
years. The tribunal currently lacks the power to imprison anybody
convicted of contravening the code.

“Corruption,” according to Mr.
Sanni, has become “so pervasive, entrenched and destructive that
special measures have to be taken to rid Nigeria of corruption and
corrupt practices” while the “penalties the tribunal is empowered to
impose should include powers to imprison those that have been found to
have contravened the code.”

The bureau’s travails

The CCB has been branded a lame
duck by most citizens for its inability to deal with corruption
regarding outright refusal of public officers to declare assets,
over-exaggerated declaration of assets, the duplication of
anti-corruption activities under the purview of the EFCC and ICPC, low
turnout of convictions and the aiding of corrupt public officers
through hoarding of information supposedly within the public domain.

In May, the agency said that it has received the asset forms of the
president, Goodluck Jonathan and vice president, Namadi Sambo. It is
commonly believed that other public office holders of the
administration have since complied with the provisions of the CCB Act
and Handbook for public officers.

Read More stories from Source

US rakes in 300b from Nigerian corruption

US rakes in 300b from Nigerian corruption

About two years after foreign law enforcement agencies slammed punitive fines in the US and Germany on Siemens for bribing officials of foreign countries – including Nigeria – to secure contracts, no Nigerian has been prosecuted.

As
Nigerian law enforcement agencies engage in what appears to be an
everlasting investigation of government officials indicted abroad for
corruption, one country, the United States, is busy raking in massive
revenue on account of Nigeria’s dereliction.

Nigeria’s bribery
misfortune has so far generated over N300 billion (approximately $2
billion) in revenue for the United States government, from fines it
imposed on companies which bribed Nigerian officials to corner
government contracts. Our analysis of the three current major
international bribery scandals (Siemens, Halliburton/TSKJ, Daimler)
involving Nigerian officials, indicates no traction or indictment from
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the agency that
leads investigations relating to economic and financial crimes.

This
finding also coincides with the release of a business survey on crime
and corruption in our country, which indicates that Nigerians have
“little trust in anti-corruption authorities.”

The report is a
collaboration between the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the European Union
(EU), and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

“It
is hard to have any confidence in these agencies, and all these endless
investigations point at nothing but a case of dereliction, and probably
collaboration, or both,” said Jiti Ogunye, a leading public interest
lawyer in Lagos, who wondered angrily “how come that 19 years after
Siemens, (the Germany-based multinational electrical firm) agreed to
pay fines to both the US and German authorities for bribing officials
of foreign countries – including Nigeria – to secure contracts, no
Nigerian has been prosecuted?”

Another attorney, Abuja-based Charles
Musa, said if the US government is fining its own citizens, and its
companies, it is unfortunate that Nigeria, where all the bribery took
place, be it Anammco or Halliburton, is just grandstanding and playing
to the gallery, and not serious about prosecuting its citizens.

“In
a proper country, those companies should have been fined themselves,
and they’ll be blacklisted. It’s unfortunate that we don’t have the
political will to prosecute any crime in this country as long as it
doesn’t involve a poor man. These people are well known, they (their
names) are on the Internet, they are in US court papers, and nothing
has happened to them. It is unfortunate,” he said.

US revenue

The
revenue made by the United States represents fines paid by bribe
givers: Siemens, Kellogg Brown & Root, Technip and Daimler AG, to
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of
Justice in settlement agreements, for giving kickbacks to Nigerian
officials in exchange for multibillion dollar contracts. And by the
time investigations are completed in the $182 million Halliburton
bribery scandal, which has so far yielded $917 million dollars for the
U.S. government, the country is likely to rake in an additional N68
billion (approximately $449million) in fines from a former Halliburton
executive Albert Jackson Stanley, two United Kingdom citizens, Jeffrey
Tesler and Wojciech Chodan, and ENI of France, a member of the infamous
TSKJ consortium.

Already, Mr Stanley has been sentenced to seven
years in jail and he is to pay $10.8 million in restitution. Tesler and
Chodan, who allegedly coordinated the elaborate bribery scheme on
behalf of the TSKJ consortium, have also been indicted by a federal
grand jury in Houston and might forfeit $132 million to the American
government.

Investigations into ENI’s involvement in the bribery
scheme is still ongoing but in anticipation of its indictment, the
company has already set aside 250 million euro, an amount it plans to
deploy in a settlement agreement with the SEC and the Department of
Justice.

America has accused the company of violating its Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, which forbids “certain classes of persons and
entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in
obtaining or retaining business.”

Unwilling Nigeria

But
while the U.S. is prosecuting its citizens involved in the scams and
compelling concerned companies to pay huge fines, Nigeria, where the
offences were committed and whose citizens received the bribes, has
failed to properly investigate the cases and punish those involved.

“What
that means is that Nigerian laws and institutions are not working and
we are paying dearly for that,” said Bunmi Aborisade, an adjunct
professor at the State University of New York. “If those fines had been
paid to our country, it would have gone a long way in alleviating
poverty among our people. But that is even if the fine proceeds are not
stolen again.”

Siemens was the first to enter into a settlement
agreement with the SEC and the American justice department. On December
12, 2008, in a charge brought against it in a US District Court for the
District of Columbia, the German company agreed to pay $350 million in
disgorgement to SEC and a $450 million criminal fine to the justice
department.

The company had earlier paid fines of 395 million Euro
(approximately $569 million) and 201 million Euro(approximately $285
million) to the office of the Prosecutor-General in Munich, Germany,
over the same charge that it bribed Nigerian officials to corner four
telecommunication contracts.

When Siemens first entered into these
plea agreements, the Nigerian government blacklisted it and suspended
it from handling government contracts. But the Umaru Yar’Adua
administration soon lifted the suspension, saying the company had
repented. The company did not pay any fine and nobody was prosecuted
for the crime.

Two months later, in February 2009, Kellog Brown and
Root parted with $177 million and $402 million in payments it made to
SEC and the department of justice for its role in the bribing of
top-level Nigerian officials in exchange for the contract to build our
$6 billion Nigerian Liquefied Natural Gas plant.

The two U.S.
agencies then went after German automaker, Daimler, and got it to cough
out a total $185 million in fines to settle charges that it compromised
Nigerian officials to award several vehicle supply contracts to it.

With
the announcement on Monday that Technip, a member of the TSKJ
consortium, had agreed to pay $338 million for its role in the bribery
of Nigerian officials, America’s total earning from enforcement
proceedings in the $182 million Halliburton bribery scam alone now
stands at $917 million (approximately N138 billion).

“The
resolutions announced today demonstrate once again the department’s
commitment to aggressively investigate and prosecute international
bribery by U.S. and foreign corporations alike,” the justice
department’s Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Mythili
Raman, said in a statement. “The fact that Technip now must pay
criminal penalties and civil disgorgement totalling $338 million should
make clear that, in the end, bribery of foreign officials will have
consequences.”

Not finished

Yet the Americans
are not finished. ENI, another member of the TSKJ consortium, is being
investigated and both SEC and the Justice department are likely to file
separate charges against the company before long. The fourth member of
the TSKJ Consortium, JGC Corporation of Japan, may, however, escape
U.S. sanctions because it is not listed in the New York Stock Exchange.
It is listed in the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

The U.S. authorities said
it was determined to bring to book all those involved in bribing
foreign officials in exchange for business favours.

“The FBI is
committed to pursuing those who disrupt the level playing field to
which companies in the U.S. and around the world are entitled,” said
FBI Assistant Director Kevin L. Perkins. “This case (Technip’s)
demonstrates the FBI’s commitment to aggressively investigate
violations of this law. We will continue to investigate FCPA matters by
working in partnership with other law enforcement agencies, both
foreign and domestic, to ensure that both corporations and executives
who bribe foreign officials in return for lucrative business contracts
are punished.” Analysts say while America’s FBI and SEC are matching
words with action, Nigeria’s EFCC, responsible for the Nigerian end of
the investigation, is running round in circles and barking without
biting.

Not lifting a finger

“It is quite
unfortunate and pathetic that foreign countries have brought to justice
those who have engaged in bribery while doing businesses in Nigeria,
while Nigeria, the victim of these corrupt practices, has not lifted a
finger in such despicable acts against the country,” said Bukola
Oreofe, executive director, Nigeria Liberty Democratic Forum, a New
York-based pro-democracy group.

“One can only leave to the
imagination the number of schools, hospitals, roads, agricultural
development, avoidable deaths that would have been averted if Nigeria
had been protected from this fleecing or if the country, through her
own criminal statutes, could bring the local and foreign perpetrators
to justice.

“If the United States can earn millions from such punishment, it is sad that Nigeria looks the other way,” Oreofe said.

Idris Akinbajo and Elor Nkereuwem contributed to this report.

Read More stories from Source

Paying the price for Lulu’s ambition

Paying the price for Lulu’s ambition

As Nigerians grieve
over their national team’s ouster from the World Cup, one group of
Nigerians would at this point be feeling the loss more than the rest of
us.

That group is the
executive committee of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF). NFF
president, Sani Lulu must be cursing his luck that our Eagles have
booked an early flight home from South Africa. He must be in pains
right now but not for the same reason as the rest of us.

Lulu knows that
with the world Cup over for Nigeria, his game is up. He knows that his
carefully crafted plan of sneaking back into office when his tenure
expires in August is in danger of unravelling.

While the Eagles
were in South Africa, Lulu’s second term machine was grinding on with
his Man Friday, Barrister Mustapha, who was appointed head of the
electoral committee, taking charge.

Such has been
Lulu’s preoccupation with returning to office that he willfully
imperilled Nigeria’s preparation for the World Cup through inordinate
ambition and carelessness.

While his more
competent and forward looking counterparts were putting plans and
structures in place for successful outing at the Mundial, Lulu decided
that the proper thing to do was to “retouch” the NFF statutes. Between
2006, when he was elected as boss of the NFF, and now, Lulu has amended
the statutes of the federation three times.

Sleight of hand

While there’s
nothing wrong with amending the laws governing how a body is run, the
substance of such amendment becomes important when foul play is
suspected. In the case of the new statutes, which Lulu has crafted,
there is evidence to suggest that the NFF boss is bent on returning to
office by improper means. A pointer is the provision of article 21, m,
which states that:

“Each State
Football shall have its elective congress in November/December
succeeding the elective congress of the Federation within the senior
FIFA World Cup year”.

This provision
appears harmless until you understand the intention of the NFF
President. Under the 2004 statutes approved by the General Assembly of
the NFF (then NFA) in December 2004 in Port Harcourt, Rivers State and
which provided guidelines for the elections that produced Lulu as NFF
President, elections were held at the various constituencies- Local
Government Football Councils, States Football Associations and the
Zones. It was these delegates who then voted Lulu into office.

Logically
therefore, you would expect that before elections into the presidency
of the NFF, those who elect the president should themselves be elected
into office first. But Lulu had a different idea hence the provision of
article 21 above. With this provision, Lulu has tactfully extended the
tenure of the chairmen of state football associations in a bid to get
them to line up behind him.

The implication of
this action is that the same set of officials who voted him into office
in 2006 will be the same people to re-elect him without they themselves
being subjected to the electoral process. It was thus no surprise that
we saw that huge jamboree in South Africa, where Lulu took all state FA
Chairmen to ‘enjoy’ the World Cup. It was an advance payment of sorts
for the job they will be doing for him in August. The balance would be
paid later.

Again, to ensure
that nothing is left to chance, Lulu in the 2010 statutes, pruned the
number of delegates who will vote at the election in August from 101 to
44. With the 37 State FA chairmen whom he has graciously taken to the
World Cup lining up behind him, there is no prize for guessing who will
win the election.

It took the efforts
of Segun Odegbami, former Nigeria international and one-time member,
who is running for the NFF presidency to checkmate Lulu. The NFF boss
has tactfully expunged that clause but is still keeping the statutes
close to his chest. Even the FA chairmen he wants to use as pawns have
not been informed of this latest development.

Rendering account

As of today, Lulu
has not made the 2010 statutes available to all members of the
federation, yet he insists on going ahead with elections in a month’s
time. Only this week Mustapha released a list of candidates who have
returned their forms. Expectably, only Lulu was the candidate for the
presidency! Ordinarily, one should not be bothered whether Lulu wanted
two or ten terms in office. As a Nigerian he is entitled to aspire to
any public office. However, given his record of performance in the last
four years he has been Nigeria’s FA boss, I do not think Nigerian
football needs another dose of his asphyxiating incompetence.

Now, that the World
Cup is over for us, attention should be focused squarely on Lulu and
his cronies. He should be forced to make the contents of the 2010
statutes public for Nigerians to see. More importantly, Sports Minister
and National Sports Commission (NSC) chairman, Ibrahim Bio, should ask
them to render an account of the money they received from the Nigerian
government.

Go to Source

Haruna, not Enyeama, is Eagles’ top performer at World Cup

Haruna,
not Enyeama, is Eagles’ top performer at World
Cup

Vincent Enyeama wowed the global
football audience, as well as millions of Nigerian football fans, with
his all-yellow football apparel along with his numerous saves
throughout Nigeria’s unsuccessful run at the World Cup.

To the average football fan, the Israel
based goalkeeper was Nigeria’s best player at the World Cup so it may
come as a shock to them that someone else other than Enyeama was
actually the country’s best performer in South Africa, according to the
Castrol Performance Index, CPI, which FIFA is using to rate players in
this tournament.

While Enyeama earned a credible 7.11
rating on the CPI, Lukman Haruna, the previously unheralded midfielder
grabbed 7.81 points to rank as the country’s top performer.

In third place is one player a
cross-section of Nigerian football fans have blamed for the Super
Eagles’ loss to Greece, Sani Kaita who finished with a modest 6.26
rating followed by Taye Taiwo and the combative Dickson Etuhu, who
covered more distance than any other Nigerian player at the World Cup –
slightly over 29 kilometres.

Other players like Chidi Odiah, Chinedu
Obasi and Danny Shittu also earned ratings from the CPI but there was
no data available for the legendary Nwankwo Kanu, despite playing 57
minutes in the 2-2 draw against Korea Republic, as well as Yusuf Ayila
and the five unused players – John Utaka, Dele Adeleye, Brown Ideye,
Austin Ejide and Dele Aiyenugba.

What is the Castrol Index?

The Castrol
Performance Index is a ranking system sponsored by Castrol. The system
uses mathematical formulas which evaluate various player performance in
terms of how individual actions either assist or prevent goals.

The system takes into account the strength of the opposition and the time in a game the player’s actions occurred.

Developed in
conjunction with Arsenal manager and Castrol global ambassador Arsène
Wenger, every pass, tackle and move on the field is measured and
assessed to see if it has a positive or negative impact on a team’s
ability to score or concede a goal. As such, the Castrol Index is the
definitive system to objectively analyse and rank player performances
throughout the 2010 World Cup.

Lukman Haruna

Matches played: 2

Minutes played: 180

Goals scored: 0

Fouls committed: 4

Fouls suffered: 4

Total shots: 3

Shots on goal: 0

Total passes: 89

Passes completed: 66

Distance covered: 20.02 km

Castrol index: 7.81

Vincent Enyeama Matches played: 3

Minutes played: 270

Goals scored: 0

Fouls committed:1

Fouls suffered:1

Saves:20

Total passes:93

Passes completed: 53

Distance covered: 8.54 km

Castrol index: 7.11

Sani Kaita

Matches played: 2

Minutes played:123

Goals scored:0

Fouls committed:1

Fouls suffered:0

Total shots:2

Shots on goal: 0

Total passes:55

Passes completed: 38

Distance covered: 13.80 km

Castrol index:6.26

Taye Taiwo

Matches played:2

Minutes played:130

Goals scored:0

Fouls committed:1

Fouls suffered:1

Total shots:4

Shots on goal:1

Total passes:60

Passes completed: 35

Distance covered:

10.91km

Castrol index:

6.18

Dickson Etuhu

Matches played:

3 Minutes played:

270 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

5 Fouls suffered:

1 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

123 Passes completed: 96 Distance covered:

29.07 km Castrol index:

6.15

Yakubu Aiyegbeni

Matches played:

3 Minutes played:

250 Goals scored:

1 Fouls committed:

9 Fouls suffered:

5 Total shots:

5 Shots on goal:

2 Total passes:

78 Passes completed: 40 Distance covered:

24.24 km Castrol index:

6.11

Chidi Odiah

Matches played:

3 Minutes played:

270 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

1 Fouls suffered:

1 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

150 Passes completed: 101 Distance covered:

26.00 km Castrol index:

5.40

Chinedu Obasi

Matches played:3

Minutes played:

194 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

6 Fouls suffered:

5 Total shots:

6 Shots on goal:

1 Total passes:

83 Passes completed: 59 Distance covered:

21.60 km Castrol index:

5.36

Danny Shittu

Matches played:3

Minutes played:

270 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

6 Fouls suffered:

0 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

74 Passes completed: 63 Distance covered:

24.19 km Castrol index:

5.30

Kalu Uche

Matches played:

3 Minutes played:

195 Goals scored:

2 Fouls committed:

1 Fouls suffered:

5 Total shots:

7 Shots on goal:

4 Total passes:

81 Passes completed: 61 Distance covered:

20.92 km Castrol index:

5.28

Obinna Nsofor

Matches played:

2 Minutes played:

72 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

0 Fouls suffered:

0 Total shots:

3 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

89 Passes completed: 66 Distance covered:

20.02 km Castrol index:

5.06

Obafemi Martins

Matches played:

2 Minutes played:

71 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

0 Fouls suffered:

2 Total shots:

2 Shots on goal:

1 Total passes:

21 Passes completed: 10 Distance covered: 8.07 km Castrol index:

4.89

Osaze Odemwingie

Matches played:

2 Minutes played:

76 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

2 Fouls suffered:

2 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

34 Passes completed: 20 Distance covered: 8.84 km Castrol index:

4.85

Joseph Yobo

Matches played:

3 Minutes played:

226

Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

1 Fouls suffered:

0 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

65 Passes completed: 39 Distance covered:

19.42 km Castrol index:

4.73

Rabiu Afolabi

Matches played:

2

Minutes played:

103

Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

0 Fouls suffered:

1 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

55 Passes completed: 39 Distance covered:

11.01 km Castrol index:

4.67

Uwa Echiejile

Matches played:

2 Minutes played:

66 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

1 Fouls suffered:

0 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

26 Passes completed: 14 Distance covered: 7.03 km Castrol index:

4.67

Yusuf Ayila

Matches played:

1 Minutes played:

90 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

5 Fouls suffered:

0 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

49 Passes completed: 36 Distance covered:

10.58 km Castrol index:

No data available

Nwankwo Kanu

Matches played:

1 Minutes played:

57 Goals scored:

0 Fouls committed:

1 Fouls suffered:

4 Total shots:

0 Shots on goal:

0 Total passes:

17 Passes completed: 13 Distance covered: 5.92 km Castrol index:

No data available

Dele Aiyenugba

Castrol index: No data available

Dele Adeleye

Castrol index:No data available

Austin Ejide

Castrol index: No data available

Brown Ideye

Castrol index: No data available

John Utaka Castrol index:

No data available

Matches Win: 0 Draw: 1 Loss: 2 Goals scored For:

3 Against:

5 Penalties:

1 Goals scored in
penalty area: 2 Goals conceded in penalty area: 3 Goals scored from
outside penalty area: 1 Goals conceded from outside penalty area: 2
Cards Yellow: 5 Red: 1 Top scorers Kalu Uche: 2 Yakubu Aiyegbeni: 1
Total shots Kalu Uche: 7 Chinedu Obasi: 6 Yakubu Aiyegbeni: 5 Taye
Taiwo: 4 Obafemi Martins:

2 Other statistics Assists:

1 Offsides:

1 Average ball possession rate: 44% Solo runs: 40 Deliveries in penalty area: 11 Clearances: 45 Clearances completed: 9 Saves:

21 Tackles:

21 Recovered balls: 17 Passes (Completion rate %) Total passes: 1180
Passes completed: 799 Passes completion rate: 67.71% Long passes: 247
Long passes completed: 104 Long passes completion rate: 42.11% Medium
passes: 663 Medium passes competed: 504 Medium passes completion rate:
76.02% Short passes: 270 Short passes completed: 191 Short passes
completion rate: 70.74% Crosses: 41 Crosses completed: 6 Crosses
completion rate: 14.63% Corners: 8 Corners completed: 6 Crosses
completion rate: 14.63% Top performers Chidi Odiah: 150 (67%) Dickson
Etuhu: 123 (78%) Vincent Enyeama: 93 (57%) Lukman Haruna: 89 (74%)
Chinedu Obasi: 83 (71%) Fouls Fouls committed: 45 Fouls suffered: 32
Top culprits Yakubu Aiyegbeni: 9 Chinedu Obasi: 6 Danny Shittu: 6
Dickson Etuhu: 5 Yusuf Ayila: 5

Go to Source

Bringing back excellence to sports in Lagos

Bringing back excellence to sports in Lagos

This column is
seriously tempted to join others in reacting to the shameful exit of
this great nation from the on-going FIFA 2010 World cup tournament, in
South Africa. I have received numerous text messages and phone calls,
asking why I have adopted the “silence” attitude to such an important
issue, affecting not only the psyche, but lives of several football
loving Nigerians.

My reasons are many
and very simple. One of them is that I have never been interested in
this particular edition of the FIFA World Cup tournament, for so many
mysterious reasons, unlike my participation in the France ‘98,
Korea/Japan in 2002 and Germany 2006. It seems very odd, but that is
the truth and I will explain in subsequent editions of this column.
Another reason has to do with FIFA and the issue of government’s
“interference.” Interference is a word which I think has been so glibly
used and I suspect abused, by the football fraternity called FIFA, not
the national federations. Hence, there are lots of very interesting
questions we are collating for FIFA to answer.

Now, to the
business of the day. I stated in last week’s column that there is the
urgent need for the Lagos State government to effect fundamental
structural changes designed to ensure genuine grass roots sports
development in this state. I also counselled that the time for such
changes – no matter how painful they may seem, is NOW. There is no
pyramid in this state with a football club, to which thousands of our
God-given young ones can aspire to be part of later in life. None. And
the reasons given by sports officials are, to say the least, absolutely
unacceptable and unprofessional.

Like many other
young boys, I grew up dreaming of playing for teams like Stationery
Stores, E.C.N., Ports Authority, Police (Machine) team, and the great
Railways football team, amongst several others, founded and based in
Lagos. I make bold to state that there is no football club in this
state today, with all the required paraphernalia like a club-house (not
a semi brothel, please), formation of other sports teams like basket
ball, tennis, etc, as part of the club; and a functional, credible and
transparent board of trustees. Not only that, there is even no football
team in this state, governed by a football-playing governor, with a
structure that can boast of well managed reserve teams, scientifically
equipped age-grade academies, with qualified coaches/trainers to manage
the academies.

Installing change

Wednesday May 12,
2010, marked the 20th anniversary of the commencement of a professional
football league in Nigeria, and by extension, Lagos State. The statute,
which established the Football Association put in place to administer
the football league, stipulated in part, that all the football teams
registering to participate in the league, had seven years to be
transformed into professional football clubs. This has unfortunately
not taken place in any state of the federation – including Lagos. This
is a travesty of the nobility of this beautiful game – one of the most
viable (if not the most viable) vocations on earth today. It should not
be like this in our own dearly beloved, Lagos, a state of excellence.
This must change. The labour of past heroes of this great state must
not be in vain.

Permit me to
repeat, for the sake of emphasis, that no matter how mundane or
pedestrian grassroots sports development may seem to many of our so –
called stakeholders, administrators, corporate organisations, and very
unfortunately, some media outfits, if we fail in Lagos state to
establish a culture of excellent sports development – with integrity as
the foundation, the systematic evolution of young sports persons,
through a very sound scientific and up-to-date technical approach,
needed to take sports to higher levels in this state and Nigeria, will
never be actualised.

How did the
infrastructure and structure that once made this state force to be
respected nationally and internationally, collapse so badly within the
last two decades, that even Lagosians are no longer confident our
sporting prowess. How did our slogan change from Eko for gold
(excellence, valour, leadership, triumph, etc), to Eko for show? Why
have we allowed mundane things like lust for money and power tussle
crowd out very relevant and progressive issues that are meant naturally
to add value to the present administration in the state? Why do many of
our sports executives – association chairpersons, committee presidents,
ex-this, ex-that and some people who claim to be friends of Governor
Fashola, perpetuate the myth that their presence is permanent?

Why are ideas
plagiarised and committed into the hands of cronies, who eventually
debase the value of such wonderful ideas, in an extremely unworthy
manner? These are questions begging for answers.

Really, an overhaul of mindset and structures is needed. The first
step is to change this laughable idea of placing sports at the local
government level under the supervision of the agriculture ministry.

Go to Source

Ghana’s top scorer injured

Ghana’s top scorer injured

Ghana striker Asamoah Gyan suffered an
ankle injury in training on Monday and sat out most of a rigorous
two-hour session as Africa’s last hopes prepared for Friday’s World Cup
quarter-final.

“I felt a knock and it’s a bit swollen,
but I don’t think it’s too serious. By Friday I’ll be ready,” he told
reporters after a lengthy training session at Mogwase, near the team’s
Sun City base. Ghana play Uruguay on Friday at the Soccer City Stadium
in Johannesburg. Gyan sat with ice wrapped around his ankle and hobbled
away after the practice but was adamant he would be in the starting
line-up against Uruguay.

More injuries

Missing from the
session were captain, John Mensah; midfielder, Kevin-Prince Boateng;
and winger, Dede Ayew, who all picked up knocks in the weekend’s second
round win over the United States. Boateng has a hamstring injury, and
is doubtful for Friday; and Mensah suffers from persistent back
problems. Ayew is resting an ankle knock plus is suspended for the
upcoming clash. But central defender Isaac Vorsah, who has missed the
last two matches for the Black Stars at the tournament in South Africa,
participated throughout the training in the crisp night air at the
small rural stadium.

Gyan, who has scored three of Ghana’s four goals at the finals, said
reaching the last eight was a massive achievement for the Black Stars.
“We are so happy to have qualified, it was so important for Ghana and
the whole of Africa. We qualified for second round four years ago and
this time we’ve made it to the quarters.” It was Gyan’s spectacular
extra-time volley that proved the winner in the 2-1 victory over the
Americans at Rustenburg on Saturday. “The goal was one of the best of
my career. I was pushed from behind and I should have fallen down (to
claim a penalty) but I resisted and I made it happen.” Thoughts of
targeting the tournament’s top scorer award, however, were not on his
mind, he told Reuters. “I’m only thinking about helping my team to win.
The prize is not important; remember football is a collective game.” </

Go to Source

Argentina’s Romero ready for Germany shootout

Argentina’s Romero ready for Germany shootout

Argentina
goalkeeper, Sergio Romero, is likely to see more action in Saturday’s
quarter-final with Germany than he has in their World Cup matches so
far. Romero, who has conceded two goals in four wins, faces one of the
higher scoring attacks at the finals when they meet in a mouth-watering
clash in Cape Town. The giant 23-year-old knows he must also be
prepared for a penalty shootout which is how Germany eliminated
Argentina in Berlin at the same stage of the 2006 finals.

“We have been
studying the penalties of all players since the World Cup started
because we know that at any moment we might have to face one and you
need to know about the taker,” the 1.92-metre tall Romero said on
Tuesday. In the 2006 quarter-final shootout, Germany goalkeeper Jens
Lehmann benefitted from a crib sheet he had on him with details of
Argentina’s likely penalty takers. Germany won it 4-2. “It was a piece
of cunning by them for the goalkeeper to have a little paper tucked
away to know about the players who were going to shoot,” Romero told a
news conference. “I think that with the work we’re doing we’re ready
for any time in the match, during the 90 minutes or in penalties,” he
said after Monday’s practice at Argentina’s University of Pretoria base.

The threat

Romero said
Germany, who have scored nine goals to Argentina’s 10 in four matches,
have “great forwards and great fighters when they don’t have the ball.
“(Lukas) Podolski has a great shot from distance, he always sets up his
left foot to shoot, (Miroslav) Klose chases every ball, he doesn’t give
any up for lost, (Mesut) Ozil plays very well, he’s technical, they
have tall people who go to all the corners and free kicks.” Romero
believes he is playing behind a very strong defence but he needed left
back Gabriel Heinze’s two clearances off the line to avoid conceding
more goals against the Mexicans in their 3-1 win on Sunday.

“Only two or three balls reach me per match, not more than that, and
I think that means I have a good defence,” said the keeper with the
long ponytail who has won the World Youth Cup and Olympic soccer titles
with Argentina. Romero has been criticised for punching the ball away
at times rather than trying to catch it. “In a match you can’t run any
risks,” he said. “If you have to parry, you parry it, if you have to
catch it you catch it and I think that’s how a goalkeeper gives his
team mates confidence.”

Go to Source

Blatter forced to reconsider technology

Blatter forced to reconsider technology

The furore over
refereeing mistakes at the World Cup forced FIFA president Sepp Blatter
into an about-turn on Tuesday, reopening the debate on the use of
goalline technology.

The 74-year-old
Swiss president of world soccer’s governing body, who apologised on
Tuesday for the errors made by referees this week, has been a stubborn
opponent of technology for years.

He effectively
closed the door on further discussions about it three months ago at the
annual meeting of soccer’s law-making body, the International Football
Association Board (IFAB).

Although he has
again ruled out using video replays to help officials with decisions,
such as offsides, he said technology such as the Hawk-Eye system used
in tennis and cricket should be re-examined to determine if the ball
had crossed the line or not for a goal.

“It is obvious that
after the experiences so far at this World Cup, it would be a nonsense
not to reopen the file on goalline technology,” Blatter said at a
briefing with selected media on Tuesday.

He was referring
specifically to the incident in Sunday’s England-Germany match at
Bloemfontein when a shot from England midfielder Frank Lampard struck
the bar and bounced down well over the line when England, chasing a
comeback, were 2-1 down.

The goal was not given and Germany went on to win the second round match 4-1.

Although there was
a second controversial incident later in the day when Argentina scored
from an offside position against Mexico in a match they won 3-1,
Blatter emphasised no technology would be debated relating to video
evidence for offsides.

He said: “We will
look again at technology, goalline technology, at the business meeting
of the International Football Association Board in Cardiff, Wales, in
July.

“The only principle
we are going to bring back for discussion is goalline technology. For
situations like the Mexico game you don’t need technology.”

Open mind

Paul Hawkins, whose
Hawk-Eye Innovations company of Winchester, England, developed the
system, was keeping an open mind about Blatter’s comments.

Hawkins told
Reuters: “Mr Blatter has said this before and there have been other
changes of mind. All he said is that they will reopen the discussion,
they haven’t said they will change their minds.

“If they’re serious
about this then they’ll contact us and we’ll just wait to find out
whether this is just a little statement to defuse the current public
pressure.

“I have had my hopes dashed too many times in the past to get too
excited, but obviously we think we can help make football a better
game.” Only hours after Blatter spoke, World Cup referees said they
would welcome technology if it made their jobs easier and helped the
decision-making process.

Go to Source

Academy students set for British scholarships

Academy students set for British scholarships

In line with its
objective of matching football with education, Pepsi Football Academy,
Nigeria’s first and biggest football academy is set to send some of its
students on a two-year scholarship scheme programme at the Brooke House
College in the United Kingdom.

Ian Nelson,
consultant to the academy revealed that 124 students within the ages of
10 – 18 years were drawn from the Academy centres all over the nation,
and will be available for selection under the scholarship scheme.
According to Nelson, the scholarship scheme is aimed at giving the
students international exposure, and an opportunity to play football
and study at the same time. Kasimawo Laloko, the academy’s director
added that the selection is a dividend of years of collaboration
between Pepsi Football Academy and some institutions in the UK, Asia
and the Americas. According to him, no fewer than eight students of the
Pepsi Academy have benefited from such scholarship scheme in the last
four years.

The selection process

The selection
process, which began from Monday June 28 will run through Friday July
2, 2010 at the Abeokuta Grammar School playing turf where the Nigerian
kids will be vying for the limited opportunities for the scholarship.
Already a three-man team from Brooke House College, UK which comprises
Giles Williams, the director; Ben Watts, the manager; and Luke Maher,
the Academy coach has arrived Nigeria for the exercise. The newly
selected students will join the four who are already in Brooke House
College on a similar scholarship.

Commenting on the scholarship selection exercise, Nelson said “This
is Pepsi’s way of exposing the young lads at the academy to
international football and training conditions while providing them
opportunity to study and play football.” The Pepsi Academy had in
recent past organized exchange schemes for her students with such
prestigious clubs as Manchester United, Chelsea Football Club, and
Bolton Wanderers, all in the UK. The Academy has also help produce
players for the national team, with players like Mikel Obi and Chinedu
Obasi been some of the many products of the academy.

Go to Source