Archive for nigeriang

OPPOSITION POLITICS: ‘Our democracy started on a wrong footing’

OPPOSITION POLITICS:
‘Our democracy started on a wrong footing’

Abiodun Aremu is a leader of the Labour and Civil Society
Coalition who says wearing Awo’s cap does not make you a progressive. Below is
excerpt of an interview he had with a NEXT reporter:

You led several protests against
the military rule. Has democracy met your expectations of good governance?

One
of the major mistakes made by the pro-democracy activists during the transition
from military to civil rule was that there was no consensus on the term of the
transition. Our campaign under the Campaign for Democracy and later the United
Action for Democracy was essentially to terminate military rule.

But
you cannot transit from military to civilian rule without talking about the
party system. There was no agreement within us whether or not to also include
the electoral agenda in our campaign. There was a section of the pro-democracy
activists made up of political parties like the National Conscience Party,
Democratic Alternative, Peoples Redemption Party, Movement for Democracy and
Justice, the Nigerian Advance Party.

Secondly,
the transition agenda was exclusive. There was no constitution guiding the
midwifery of the transition. So, none of those political parties I mentioned
above were registered. Many of us could not join a party we desired but were
left with the option of joining the PDP, ANPP, or AD. So, our democracy started
on a wrong footage and how can we expect dividend of democracy?

But
what we should have done then was to have insisted on a democratic
constitution. The present Constitution was promulgated only after 1999
elections. And considering that the military government then was unstable, we
should have furthered our agitations, even if it means an extension of the
military government but then, many people were in a haste to see the military
go that they threw caution to the wind.

Without
a democratic constitution, there is no democracy and governance will always be
impaired. So now, we are back at the table crying for a democratic constitution,
which is the root cause of all the insurgents we are having now. One of the
problems we have had to grapple with today is unconstitutional reforms, yet we
have a Constitution that needs to be totally overhauled, not amended. So, for
me, the transition is a failure.

Even
the western countries negotiated the transition for their economic interests.
Structural Adjustment Programme, National Economic Development Strategy I and
II, 7-point agenda, Vision 2020, are programmes tailored around the neo-liberal
paradigms of the IMF and World Bank.

Apart
from the failures, have we made any progress?

In
the Second Republic, you cannot swear-in anybody as the winner of an election
until all litigations and disputes have been settled. Classical example
happened in Ondo State where Omoboriowo was declared the winner of the
governorship election by the then Federal Electoral Council and there was a
dispute. On October 1st, 1983, 18 state governors were sworn-in with the
exception of Ondo. Adekunle Ajasin was not sworn-in until the Supreme Court
pronounced its judgement in his favour. But what do we see now? People occupy
political offices for three years before being pronounced illegal occupants. Do
you consider that a forward or backward movement?

Again,
what many point to as freedom of speech was not won because we now have
democracy. Between 2003 and 2005, there were about eight strikes and mass
protests against fuel price hike. The police dealt with us seriously. At a
time, the president of the NLC then, Adams Oshiomole, was dragged on the tarmac
of Abuja Airport. We had a democratic government, yet our right of assembly was
not respected. We have not made progress; we have only stuffed few peoples
pocket with our budgets.

Today,
an unconstitutional office, like that of the First Lady, controls billions of
naira, but workers are finding it difficult to earn N18,000 as minimum wage.
Dividend of democracy is not constructing a 1km road; it is about meeting the
aspiration of the people.

So,
how do we begin the change process?

The
pro-democracy forces must rise up once again. But this time, the campaign
should be on our electioneering process. We must ensure that process is based
on germane issues of economy, security, and others. We must ask for who
controls the economy. That was how it was done in the first and second
republics. Campaigns were based on issues affecting the people and the nation.
Little wonder that the people who dominated our political offices today are
people who opposed the struggle for democracy, especially in the National
Assembly.

Can
anybody’s manifesto contain privatisation of national patrimonies like NEPA and
still expect people to vote for him? Countries’ progresses are based on how
well they perform on the Human Development Index scale. Nigeria has continually
had woeful performance, yet we won’t ask our politicians what they can do to
solve that problem. Now, it is clear we cannot meet the Millennium Development
Goals and we are not querying our leaders.

Does
your assessment exonerate the progressives?

I
found it difficult to understand those who call themselves progressives. In
Nigerian historical context, being a progressive means you subscribe to the
philosophy of running a welfarist state, that is, to govern in the interest of
the masses. Such governments should not run a private-sector driven economy.
Look at what is happening with the Lekki-Epe expressway now. Fashola says he is
providing low-cost housing, but go to any of those houses, no low-income earner
can afford them but they could under Jakande.

Abubakar
Rimi’s government was the first to declare May 1 as workers day. And this is a
challenge to those of us pro-democracy activists to ignore the fact that we are
friends with the so called progressives today and engage them to prove their
progressiveness.

Progressiveness
is not just about wearing Awolowo’s cap and glasses. The difference between
those who called themselves progressives and the PDP is like six and half a
dozen. First, many of them are not even holding primaries in their parties. So,
why won’t there be rigging if there is no internal democracy?

Why
did you say the real heroes of June 12 never went on exile?

A
lot of people who were not really in the struggle went on exile. David Mark was
also on exile then. Adedibu was imprisoned at that time also. We were both in
Ikoyi prison, though he was a snitch. So, going on exile is now their
certificate as June 12 heroes.

There
are very few people who had to go on exile for fear of their lives. Then, the
CD’s ID Card was all you need to get visa in most embassies. Now, they claim to
be heroes, but how many remember those who refused to go on exile but stayed
behind, some losing their lives in the process. Though no role is dismissible
as unimportant, but the real activists of June 12 remained here.

I’m
not sure anybody has ever celebrated Rauf Aregbesola as a June 12 hero, yet he
is a strong one. There are many unsung heroes of June 12 and the governments
now profiting from that struggle should be operating a welfarist economy to
ensure peoples’ struggles were not in vain, to let people know that struggle
pays.

Click to Read More Latest News from Nigeria

ExxonMobil, others disown Emeagwali

ExxonMobil, others disown Emeagwali

The bottom has fallen out of Phillip Emeagwali’s basket of false
claims. American oil giant, ExxonMobil, has told NEXT exclusively that it has
never dealt with the American-based Nigerian scientist, contrary to Mr.
Emeagwali’s repeated claim that he wrote the equations that the company used to
simulate the flow of oil, water, and gas inside its reservoirs.

Authorities at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a United
States Department of Energy laboratory, where Mr. Emeagwali claimed he sourced
the Connection Machine for his award-winning experiment, also said they had
never related with the Nigerian scientist.

Even the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, the
world’s largest organisation of computer experts, has reacted to the scandal
surrounding Mr Emeagwali by removing the scientist’s profile from its website.
Mr. Emeagwali’s bio on the site contained some contentious claims, including
one that he has a doctorate.

Read the complete
story in this week’s edition of NEXT on Sunday.

Click to Read More Latest News from Nigeria

Reactions to England’s bid defeat

Reactions to England’s bid defeat

After
Russia got the nod to host the 2018 World Cup from FIFA’s executive
committee, reactions have been diverse as it has been wide. Some have
castigated the British media for being tactless while some have vented
their spleen on the Russians, and have been labelled as being corrupt
along with all the FIFA executive committee members that voted on the
bids. England captain Rio Ferdinand has led the reaction to the failed
World Cup 2018 bid, describing himself as “gutted”.

Ferdinand wrote on
his Twitter account: “Wow Russia will host the world cup 2018….soooo
gutted. What more could we have done? What did we do wrong?” The Mayor
of London, Boris Johnson, who was part of the official delegation also
followed in voicing his disappointment. “This is a tremendously
disappointing result.

“We put together a
cracking bid, our technical specification was top notch and our
stadiums would have been packed to the rafters. Londoners love
football. This is a blow but we have achieved a great deal with this
bid and we have much to look ahead to.

“We remain 100%
focused on developing London as the most exciting sporting destination
in the world, and we have a lot to offer other countries from putting
together our bid and from planning the Olympic and Paralympic Games. We
will carry on providing a strong voice in football and world sport.”
Martin Peters, of Sky Sports News said: “I’m absolutely gutted. I’m
sure the boys of 66 would have loved to have it back here and they’ll
all be really upset.” Former Football Association chief executive Mark
Palios though disappointed believes the bid team did their absolute
best in the circumstances.

“The bid team
themselves did a fantastic job. They put forward the best case they
could put forward and it does no discredit to them the fact we haven’t
won it. It’s deeply disappointing for this country.” Former England
skipper Alan Shearer told BBC Radio Five Live: “I don’t think anyone
could have done any more, everyone’s worked very, very hard but at the
end of the day, it’s not been successful. If you try your best at least
you can sleep at night.

“I was hoping I might see a World Cup in my lifetime in England. I wasn’t born the last time we had one in ‘66.

“It’s unfortunate,
it’s sad, it hurts, but you have to congratulate the winners and Russia
have been winners today – and Qatar – so well done to those guys, I’m
sure they’ve worked very hard, but it’s disappointing from my point of
view.

“Everyone was
really happy and really confident with the bid that we put in; we don’t
feel as though we could have done any more.

“Everyone has
worked tirelessly and for the Prime Minister and Prince William to do
what they have done, we really couldn’t have done any more.” CEO of the
England bid, Andy Anson said “I’m just gutted. We were quietly
confident we’d go all the way.” Prime Minister David Cameron added: “It
is bitterly disappointing. I think according to FIFA we had the best
technical bid, the best commercial bid.

No-one could
identify any risks coming to England. It turns out that’s not enough.”
The Daily Mirror rhetorically asked on its front page: “Russia, a Mafia
state rotten to core with corruptions. Qatar, a medieval kingdom with
no freedom of speech. Both are swimming in oil money.

How on earth did
they persuade the dodgy fat cats of FIFA to give them the World Cup?”
The back page has a picture of CAF President, Issa Hayatou, who is said
to be the only man (other than the FA’s Geoff Thompson) who voted for
England despite being one of the men named in Panorama’s probe.

The front page of
The Guardian’s sport section had just a picture of Joseph Blatter
holding the World Cup with a header – “The man who got what he wanted.”
Russia’s 2018 World Cup bid chief Aleksey Sorokin revealed that the
most important condition to win had been hard work for a year and a
half, providing numerous presentations, both personal and for different
football confederations. “Our goal for the final presentation was to
really tell how we felt about the idea of a bid, rather than discuss
the specifics of our bid.” Russia’s FIFA member Vitaly Mutko compared
winning the right to host the 2018 World Cup to the fall of the Berlin
Wall.

Mutko said: “Twenty
one years ago the Berlin Wall was broken. Today we can break another
symbolic wall and open a new era in football together.

“Russia represents
new horizons for FIFA, millions of new hearts and minds and a great
legacy after the World Cup, great new stadiums and millions of boys and
girls embracing the game.

FIFA’s president Sepp Blatter expressed satisfaction with the 2018 and 2022 World Cup bidding process.

“We will travel to two completely new countries. There has never been a World Cup in Russia or elsewhere in Eastern Europe.”.

“Additionally, nations from the Middle East and the Arabic world have long been waiting to get the chance to host the World Cup.

“This being said, I’m clearly a satisfied man at the moment.
Football is moving in the right direction and these decisions make me a
happy FIFA president.”

Click to Read More Sports Stories

Shooting Stars out to change history in Aba

Shooting Stars out to change history in Aba

It
has been six years since Shooting Stars defeated Enyimba in a Premier
League game. It has also been four years since the Ibadan side earned a
point at home or on the road against the Aba-based outfit, but that is
the least they have to do today at the Enyimba International Stadium if
they don’t want to lose further grounds in the race for this season’s
league championship.

Only last weekend,
Fatai Amoo’s side lost 1-0 in Kano to former champions Kano Pillars. It
was their first loss of the season and saw them drop from the top of
the league table hence, Amoo will want his side to at least emerge with
a draw from today’s encounter against the defending league champions.

Aba has however
never been a favourable haunting ground for Shooting Stars. Over the
past six seasons the best results the Ibadan side have emerged with
from Aba have been back-to-back 1-0 defeats at the hands of the former
two-time CAF Champions League winners, both of which arrived in the
past two seasons following Shooting Stars’ return to the Premier League
after two seasons in the lower division.

“All of that is history,” retorted Amoo when reminded of his side’s poor record at the Enyimba International Stadium.

“There comes a time
when history gets changed. Besides, I wasn’t the coach, most of the
players in the team right now didn’t play those games so what makes you
feel we can’t go there and get a good result.

“Also, they
(Enyimba) haven’t been fantastic this season judging from their results
so far,” added the former Super Eagles assistant coach.

Enyimba, so far
this season, have had a topsy-turvy campaign and only last weekend
suffered a shocking one-nil defeat to newcomers Bukola Babes in Offa.
They had also lost earlier in the season to Sunshine Stars at Ijebu
Ode, but have been invincible when playing in front of their teeming
home fans.

“They are difficult
to beat in Aba but rather than that intimidating us, it is actually
serving as a motivational factor for us as the players would love
nothing better than to be the ones to dent Enyimba’s home record,”
continued Amoo.

“Besides, we don’t
want to lose two games in a row; that will not be good for us even
though the season is still very young,” added the former Sunshine Stars
and Julius Berger coach who has set a top-four finish target for
Shooting Stars come the end of the season.

Wolves set to devour Lobi

Also today, Warri
Wolves, who are yet to taste defeat this season, will welcome Lobi
Stars to the Warri Township Stadium where they hope to continue their
march towards the top of the league table with a win.

However, Lobi
Stars, who only last weekend recorded their first win of the season – a
2-1 home win over Niger Tornadoes – will take solace in the fact that
Wolves are not totally invincible when playing at the Township Stadium
as exemplified by their 2-2 draw against Heartland. The Warri team was
two-nil down to the visitors from Owerri, before scoring two late goals
to end the match in a draw.

Lobi’s fortunes
away from home do not however appear likely to change at the end of
today’s game against Paul Aigbogun’s side even though their previous
losses on the road were marginal losses to Enugu Rangers (3-2) and
Gombe United (1-0).

If the outcome of
Warri Wolves’ last weekend’s 1-0 away win against JUTH in Jos is
anything to go by, then Lobi will do best to sit back and defend deep
and hope to catch the high-flying Wolves on the break the way Heartland
did two weeks ago.

And if they do get
to catch the home side unawares and grab a goal or two, they will hope
the home side doesn’t come out fighting as they did against Heartland,
while they, on their part, don’t capitulate the way they did against
Rangers back in their opening game of the season.

Records show that Lobi Stars have lost on their last two visits to Warri.

Zamfara hoping to shock Rangers

Also today, at the
Nnamdi Azikiwe Stadium in Enugu, Zamfara United will be guests of
Rangers who last weekend suffered a 2-0 defeat at the hands of Sunshine
Stars – their second successive away defeat of the season.

Last season, the
team from Gusau (but who have been playing their home games this time
around in Kano) shocked Rangers in Enugu by taking a point back to
their base following a 1-1 draw.

And after coming
from two goals down to pip Plateau United last week in a thrilling
encounter played in Kano, Zamfara’s confidence will be sky-high.

Zamfara’s
aspirations in today’s game will further be boosted by the absence of
Rangers’ duo of Uche Nwofor and Ejike Uzoenyi who have both combined to
score four of the Enugu side’s eight goals thus far in this season’s
campaign.

Fred Okwara, who
has scored three goals this season, will however be available for
Alphonsus Dike’s side and Zamfara will do well to prevent the tricky
forward from getting much of the ball today. Failure to do that will
see them returning home without a point and, probably, a hatful of
goals.

Also today, former
champions, Kano Pillars will be away to steadily improving Crown FC,
while Kaduna United will welcome JUTH to the Kaduna Township Stadium.

Click to Read More Sports Stories

Russia beats England in football diplomacy

Russia beats England in football diplomacy

The
storm is gathering and the dust has refused to settle after FIFA, the
world football governing body, named Russia and Qatar the hosts of the
2018 and 2022 World Cups respectively.

The 22 members of
FIFA’s executive committee – they would have been 24 had Amos Adamu of
Nigeria and Reynald Temarii of Tahiti not been suspended – chose Russia
over Spain/Portugal, Netherlands/Belgium and England for 2018 and Qatar
ahead of the United States of America, South Korea, Japan and Australia
for the 2022 World Cup.

Firstly, both
countries will be hosting the world’s largest single sport competition
for the first time and FIFA showed that they are ready to venture into
previously uncharted territory.

Russia, the world’s
largest country will be hosting the Mundial in 2018, after hosting the
Winter Olympics in 2014 and Qatar, with a population of 1.7 million
people, became the smallest country to be awarded the hosting rights.

Secondly, the
bidding pattern showed that FIFA and other sports bodies like the
International Olympic Committee (IOC) do not take the issue of human
rights into consideration when awarding hosting rights. Take the
instance of awarding the 2008 Olympics to China and now FIFA, awarding
the 2018 World Cup bid to Russia – the major selling point is believed
to be money. Russia, through President Vladimir Putin, has promised to
inject over $10 billion into hosting the world in 2018 and Qatar, is
known as the richest oil-rich country in the world. The Qataris have
promised to provide air-conditioned stadiums so that the heat, which
reaches about 50c, in summer, will be controlled.

After the pronouncements, Blatter was quick to state his happiness at the choices made by the executive committee members.

“Never has the
World Cup been in Russia and Eastern Europe, and the Middle East and
Arabic world have been waiting for a long time so I’m a happy president
when we talk about the development of football,” Blatter said.

But this
declaration will not stop the rumours and the side talks that the bids
were as corrupt as they could ever be. Before the voting on Thursday, a
McKinsey report scored Russia last amongst the 2018 bidders and Qatar
was placed second to last of the five 2022 World Cup bid candidates.

All for the money

FIFA’s executive
committee members are now seen to have voted with their calculators and
in the end the billions of dollars that were on show to be tapped in
both Russia and Qatar won over the ‘best technical bids’ of both
England and the USA, in the words of FIFA’s president, Joseph Blatter.

At the moment,
Russia and Qatar cannot boast modern football stadiums – they will have
to be built or renovated to taste. Where England spent £15million on
promoting its 2018 bid, Russia spent at least £25million, with
oligarchs such as Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich contributing millions
more. Qatar spent an estimated £108million.

Both countries are
propped up by the billions flowing in from their vast oil and gas
reserves. Russia revealed in its bid document that there will be a lot
of new stadium construction and renovations on old ones. The bid
proposed 16 stadiums, 13 of them would be newly built, at a cost of
$3.82 billion.

Qatar will build
nine new stadiums and renovate three with a total cost of $3 billion
including the climate-control technology that will be needed to keep
the temperature on the pitch to 27c but it would still be over 50c
outside on the streets.

Why did England fail?

It had also been
reported that FIFA requested, as a condition if England had won the
bid, an exclusion from a range of UK laws including the one governing
Banks and Foreign Exchange Operations. FIFA had asked for “unrestricted
import and export of all foreign currencies to and from the UK, and
these were agreed to, so why then did the bid fail?

Some have argued
that England’s bid was pretentious – they did not play the game the
right way and it has been suggested in some quarters that their bid
would have been best served if the London Times had not disclosed the
result of its sting operations on Amos Adamu and Reynald Temarii. The
information could just have been transferred to FIFA’s executive
committee and that would have been enough to sway the votes their way.
But that was not the case and if the damage and embarrassment caused by
the expose was not enough, BBC had to run an edition of its documentary
programme Panorama on Monday – preceding the voting on Thursday –
accusing FIFA officials of corruption, dating back 16 years ago.

If the first expose
did not dent its chances, the Panorama programme blew a large hole,
which could not be filled by the three Lions, Prime Minister David
Cameron, Prince William and David Beckham in England’s bid. Before they
got to Zurich on Wednesday, England’s bid had already foundered.
Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin did not help matters when he
jumped on the FIFA bandwagon by castigating the English press.

Putin said: “I
would like to note that recently we have watched with disappointment as
an obvious campaign was being unleashed against members of the FIFA
executive committee.

“They are being
smeared in dirt and compromised. I consider it as part of unscrupulous
bit of competition in preparations for the selection of the
host-country for the World Cup.”

Blaming the media

After the initial
shock which followed the announcement, the BBC and other media
organisations were roundly castigated for England’s loss.

England captain Rio Ferdinand in his reaction on twitter said “the timing of the Panorama programme was (in) bad taste, fact”.

FIFA executive member, Japan’s Junji Ogura, who reportedly voted for the English bid, said:

“England was eliminated in the first round, and they were maybe affected by the BBC and The Sunday Times’ reporting.

“England has full
facilities and they could hold the World Cup any time. I think
England’s media reporting affected FIFA executive committee members.”

But England’s Prime Minister said the country could not have done any more to secure the tournament.

Prince William also
spent the last three days meeting with FIFA delegates round-the-clock
trying to reverse the damage already done to their bid by their media,
but the efforts seem to have come too late.

“Well, obviously we’re extremely disappointed and so is the team. We had a very strong bid but sadly it didn’t work out.

“The guys are quite
down at the moment but they put their whole backs into it. It’s very
sad. We gave everything we could and the guys, I’m so proud of them.
I’m sorry for the fans back home. We gave everything we could,” he said.

‘Excellent’ but not good enough

The bid team actually gave all they could but would their case have been better served with more money?

Mr. Cameron’s
official spokesman on Friday refused to say the voting process was
either good or clean. FIFA’s controversial decisions have reinforced
insinuations that the world body is corrupt. The voting process was for
the highest bidder with FIFA apparently enticed by the amount to be
made in these new territories as against the people that will be
watching the games. From that point of view, the economic shift from
west to East and to the mid-East showed in FIFA’s voting pattern and in
that sense, the American and English bids did not stand a chance.

Hopes had been
raised when Blatter described the English 30-minute presentation as
‘excellent and remarkable’. But then there was the more galling
disclosure that the England bid did not make it past the first round of
voting and that the Netherlands/Belgium bid got more votes than the
English bid.

Andy Anson, the CEO of the England 2018 bid said believes England was betrayed.

“When people look
you in the eye and promise you something, you hope they live up to
their word – but clearly that hasn’t happened,” Anson said.

“I am not going to
name names because that is not fair on individuals but clearly some
people have. We thought we had more than six votes, perhaps seven or
eight. We got two.

“The two bids with
the worst technical reports won. We spent £3 million on ours and that
money has gone down the drain by the looks of it. For me the biggest
disappointment is that we clearly had the best technical bid, the best
economic evaluation, and everyone has told me we had the best
presentation. I was surprised to see Russia win it.”

When asked if he thought FIFA hates the English. He replied: “I don’t think they do.”

Russia and racism

The 2018 bid
engendered a cold war of sorts between England and Russia. Alexander
Sorokin, CEO of the Russian bid had started it all when he said London
was a hotbed of violence, drunken teenagers and rape. Russia’s bid
chief highlighted London’s high crime rate and youth alcohol problems.

“It’s no secret,
for example, that London has the highest crime rate when compared with
other European cities, and the highest level of alcohol consumption
among young people,” Sorokin said.

The comments not
only offended the English, it contravened FIFA’s rules, which do not
allow bid nations to criticise their rivals. He went ahead to accuse
the British media of running a campaign to smear Russia’s reputation
and added that English football had a spell with racism and was also
dealing with the issue.

While dismissing
claims of racial intolerance by Russians, Sorokin also spoke about the
incident involving the West Bromwich Albion forward, Osaze Odemwingie.
The striker was racially taunted after he left Locomotiv Moscow to join
West Bromwich Albion in the Premiership.

“We could start a
conversation about the lack of tolerance and inciting ethnic hatred by
English fans but do not behave like the aunt in the kitchen criticising
our neighbours. The banana banner was not racist. It was directed
against a particular player who got very good money, lived very well
here but for some reason did not seem to want to play well.

“Racism is a common problem, not just in Russia. All soccer countries have had this, including Britain.

Naturally we must fight this and in the Russian Football Union we have a programme to combat all forms of racism,” Sorokin said.

Nigerian striker,
Odemwingie had complained about the banner but Sorokin said: “Maybe he
(Odemwingie) simply wants to become more popular. In any case I am
sorry that this is happening.”

If it was not a
charge of racism, it would be that the country is too big and then to
an apparent lack of adequate infrastructure to cope with the expected
deluge of football fans from all around the world. The reasons given
for choosing Russia for the 2018 World Cup is then quite simple, they
had the most money to be pumped into stadia development and most
probably to spread around.

England not cheated

Russia has a record
of football racism, as other countries do and the dossier on organised
crime is well documented especially in classified diplomatic documents
recently released by wikileaks, with Putin being accused of enriching
himself to the tune of billions. The country is also so big that
travelling across it will be expensive for the normal football fan. All
these and more have to be considered – in the eight years between now
and 2018.

Putin did not help
matters when he said on Friday that he did not believe England was
cheated out of the 2018 World Cup. “No, I don’t think. You know, Great
Britain is a great football country and in Russia we have a lot of fans
of your football in general and your football players in particular.

“Great Britain
lost. It lost, but we are waiting for you in 2018 and we will do our
best for the football players, for the English football players, for
them to realise themselves,” the Daily Express quoted Putin, as saying.

But as the
disappointment sinks in further, English football fans will look to the
perceived major culprit for the missed bid, veteran investigative
journalist, Andrew Jennings of the BBC and his Panorama programme.

Perhaps the whole thing was staged by Blatter as pay back for a 2007
edition in which Jennings said over a backdrop of Blatter’s image:
“This is one of the most unpopular men in world football, and he
controls it. His name is Sepp Blatter and his organisation is in a bit
of trouble, and I’m another. My name is Andrew Jennings and Mr Blatter
can’t stand me.” FIFA’S voting indeed showed that they cannot stand the
English.

Click to Read More Sports Stories

RED CARD: England fails to learn time-honoured lesson

RED CARD:
England fails to learn time-honoured lesson

FIFA broke English hearts last Thursday when it handed the 2018 World Cup hosting rights to Russia.

The signs that the
England bid had foundered was clear to all discerning followers of
events in London, Zurich and Moscow but the English. Till the very end
they held on to the hope, quite clearly forlorn, that they had it in
the bag.

Their attitude is
the product of the English cast of mind, which believes that the
universe, vast as it is, revolves around London and its environs. It is
like a ninety-year old man who in his prime was the heavyweight boxing
champion of the world believing in his old age that he can take on a
man half his age.

The English forget
that the world of the 21st century is markedly different from the days
of empire, the age of Nelson when it held sway on the minds and affairs
of men. Then, it could go to negotiations or the bargaining table with
swagger and come away successful. Today, the reality is different.
Modern day negotiations are underpinned not by moral purpose but
largely by a bottomless pocket and sheer devilry.

The Russians,
reviled globally today as mafias and deviants understood the score.
They knew the game and were willing to play ball after all, the World
Cup is all about football. While the Russians went into ‘hard’
negotiations with the 24 ‘wise’ men of the exalted FIFA executive
committee, the English resorted to blackmail.

The sting operation
carried out by London’s Sunday Times may have done everyone a world of
good in exposing the corruption and graft that has underpinned FIFA’s
activities in the last decade but from a practical point of view, it
was a strategic blunder.

The English should
ask themselves in terms of returns on investment, whether the heads of
Amos Adamu and Reynard Tenarii presented to them on a platter by the
Times, equates the £15 million they spent on their bid.

In scalping Adamu
and Tenarii, the English thought they were forcing the perceived issue
of corruption among FIFA executive members and thereby knocking the
remaining 22 members into line. They misfired. They forgot the time
honoured rule among cults and fraternities -‘all for one and one for
all.’ In taking on Adamu and Tenarii, they had taken on the entire FIFA
executive committee. They had made them look bad and focused global
attention on them and they were not going to forget that. Last Thursday
was payback time and they did so in spectacular fashion.

An act of hubris

The two votes cast
for England; one of them cast by Geoff Thompson, chairman of England’s
FA underscores the enormity of the angst felt by Sepp Blatter and his
henchmen in the FIFA executive committee.

To hear Andy Anson,
head of England’s bid talk about betrayal surely amuses. Anson, in a
fit of bellyaching after the announcement said he had been assured of
at least six to eight votes.

What naiveté! The
truth is, like the tragic hero in classical Greek tragedy, England fell
to a monumental act of hubris. As if the Times expose was not enough,
the BCC worsened England’s already precarious situation with the
Panorama programme, which was aired on Monday, three days before the
vote. As far as timing goes, it was serious faux pas on the part of the
management of the BBC. If the FIFA officials had intended to overlook
the Adamu/Tenarii embarrassment, the Panorama broadcast proved a strong
disincentive. When you add the fact that FIFA officials love Andrew
Jennings, the producer of the programme, the way cats love mice then
you can understand why England didn’t have a prayer.

For the moment, I
say Goodluck to Russia. Despite giving the world some of the finest
players to have played the game -Lev Yashin, Rinat Dasaev, Igor
Belanov, Oleg Blokhin and Andrei Arshavin – Russia have not hosted the
game. It would be interesting to see what they make of this assignment.

Of course the decision to hand hosting rights to them have not gone
down well with everyone. Doomsday scenarios have already rent the air,
with talk of racism and crime in the society leading discussion board.
Conventional wisdom demands we give the Russians the benefit of doubt.
Remember South Africa and India? Critics said they couldn’t pull off
the hosting of the 2010 FIFA World Cup and Commonwealth Games
respectively but we know how they went, don’t we?

Click to Read More Sports Stories

Getting spectators back to the stadiums

Getting spectators back to the stadiums

The Nigerian
Football League (NFL), since its founding in 1972, has been running
weekly fixtures of professional football matches during soccer seasons
at various venues across Nigeria. Midweek fixtures are also part of the
bargain.

The arrangement
means that football clubs have to travel to match venues every week for
matches and when they are not on the road, they are at home hosting
visiting teams.

Consequently, various hotels and hospitality centres across the country enjoy sustained patronage throughout the soccer season.

The transport
companies, the highways and even airports are also kept busy, as
players, officials, stakeholders and millions of fans regularly travel
to different match venues for the football tournaments.

The good old days

While the home
teams enjoy massive support from their fans, the visiting sides just
have to cope with the cheers from the few supporters, who travel along
with them.

“It is fun to
travel with clubs; it provides the soccer fans the ample opportunity to
relax and enjoy good football. It also enables them to explore what the
host cities can offer them before, during and after the matches,” says
Jonathan Okwuolisa a football pundit.

“We often relax
over plates of pepper soup and beer to relive memories of games in
cities like Lagos, Enugu, Kaduna, Minna, Port Harcourt, Jos, Ibadan and
Kano, where we travel to for the matches.”

Okwuolisa, a
die-hard supporter of Enugu Rangers International FC in the 1970s and
the 1980s, recalls that Enugu city then had several entertainment
spots, where the players and club supporters gathered to relax after
the day’s match.

“We sponsored
ourselves for such tours and we never depended on the club or sponsors
to fund our trips to watch matches. All we wanted was good soccer and
we had huge doses of that in cities such as Benin, Jos, Ibadan, Minna,
Kaduna and Kano,” he said.

Okwuolisa recalls
that Enugu Rangers International FC then had many supporters in those
cities, adding that most of them were Igbo traders and people resident
in the cities.

Dominic Nwobodo, a
former Rangers star player who was widely known by his fans as
‘Alhaji’, recalls that more football fans made it to the stadiums in
those days to cheer their respective clubs.

“The clubs, no
doubt, entertained the fans with good football and outstanding players
became instant celebrities at the end of matches,” Nwobodo said.

No longer the same

The views tend to
reflect the wide public acceptance of football in those days, as people
regularly trooped to stadiums to watch matches. But many say things are
no longer the same.

Nnaemka Okoli, a
student, said the security factor is partly responsible for the seeming
apathy of people toward watching football matches in stadiums nowadays.

“The stadiums are
no longer safe, as the police are not always around to provide
security,” he said adding that “The few policemen at the stadiums are
only interested in watching the matches; they don’t care about the
people’s safety.”

Farouk Ibrahim, 55,
a Rancher Bees FC fan said, “These days, the payment of gate fees does
not guarantee one a seat inside the stadium.”

For Joy Etim, a
supporter of Niger Tornadoes FC, said she stopped going to stadiums
because of the unruly behaviour of some fans who often molest ladies.

For Christopher
Eze, a fan of Enyimba FC, said that the rising crime rate is a problem.
He said due to the wave of kidnapping in Aba, he has stopped going to
the city to watch league matches involving the club.

“Even before Aba
was overrun by kidnappers and other criminal elements, some hoodlums
had converted a section of the city’s stadium into an Indian
hemp-smoking joint. Nobody, including the police, has been able to
dislodge the miscreants.

“This, among other aberrations, has discouraged me from going to the stadium to watch matches,” Eze said.

Organisers losing out

The current apathy
of football fans towards league matches has seriously affected the
fortunes of the organisers because of their scanty proceeds from gate
fees.

It has also
affected local government councils and state gaming commissions that
usually receive part of the entertainment tax levied on proceeds from
the gate fees.

Wahab Osinowo, a
fan of the defunct Stationery Stores of Lagos, recalls in the 1970s and
1980s, football clubs of like Rangers International FC, Vasco Da Gama
FC, IICC Shooting Stars, Spartans FC, Abakaliki White Angels, Niger
Tornadoes FC, Zuma Rocks FC, ACB FC, Rancher Bees FC, Racca Rovers FC,
were crowd pullers.

He added that other
football clubs like Stationary Stores FC, Mighty Jets FC, Bendel
Insurance FC, Sharks FC, Flash Flamingoes FC and Leventis United FC had
appreciable supporters in those days.

“These clubs were
household names, just like some of their star players. We had stars
like Emeka and Ifeanyi Onyedika, Cyril Okosieme, Christian Chukwu,
Ernest Ufele, Sylvanus Okpala, Patrick Ekeji, Aloy and Andrew Atuegbu,
Adokiye Amiesimaka, Muda Lawal, Segun Odegbami, Wole Odegbami and
Ndubuisi Okosieme,” Osinowo said.

Many fans recall that during the period, there were seasoned sports commentators like Ernest Okonkwo,

Sebastian Ofurrum, Walter Batowei, Kelvin Ejiofor and Fabio Lanipekun of NTA.

They also note that
sports reporters like S.B. Oshuntolu of Daily Times, Segun Adenuga of
the Herald Newspapers and Vincent Obi of News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)
then added glamour to the football scene via their incisive reports.

Analysts noted that
the multifaceted media activities on the sports scene then were largely
helpful in grooming footballers to become stars, while motivating
football fans to come to stadiums to watch matches.

“That era has now been consigned to the dust bin of history,” said Emeka Odikpo, a sports commentator for Radio Nigeria.

He lamentd that
European leagues — the English Premiership, Spanish Liga, German
Bundesliga and the French League, Italia Series A — have all dealt a
fatal blow on the public acceptability of the local league.

“These are now the
popular fixtures that now dominate the pay TVs and even the terrestrial
networks,” he said, adding that Nigerian companies which ought to be
naturally interested in the survival of the local league, even sponsor
the broadcast of foreign league matches.

He, however,
concedes that the quality of the country’s facilities – pitches,
stadium ambience and high-definition pictures – tend to make the
foreign leagues more attractive to Nigerians.

“It is funny to
note the fan base of foreign clubs in Nigeria have become so huge that
they have formed local affiliates of the teams’ fans clubs and they
even wear replicas of the clubs’ jerseys to Tviewing centres to watch
matches,” Samuel Adekunle, a journalist, said.

Besides, Adekunle
said, rival fans of these foreign often engage themselves in fights
whenever big matches are being played in faraway Europe. He added that
there had been some reported cases of deaths and injuries arising from
such clashes.

Reviving the Nigerian league

However, Chidi
Offor-Okenwa, the Chairman of Enugu State Football Association,
strongly believes that the citizens’ interest in the local league can
be revived.

“Our league stands a good chance of bouncing back. It is even in a position to rekindle the promotion of internal tourism.

“With good
re-packaging, soccer, being one of the greatest sports with many
followers at home and abroad, remains a unifying factor in the country,
cutting across ethnic, religious and cultural divide.

“The league has
commercial value because of its potential to promote merchandising,
advertising and sales, as well as other transactions on goods and
services.

“It also has an
in-built conflict-resolution mechanism, which can be exploited by
communities, and organisations in efforts to adopt the principle of
‘fair play’,” Offor-Okenwa said.

But can Nigerian
stadiums be filled up with spectators watching football matches? Can
anything be done to bring back fans to stadiums? How can the football
administrators rekindle Nigerians’ interest in the league?

To many pundits,
the league has also experienced a major setback because of the
controversies that trailed the election that brought Davidson Owumi in
as the Chairman of the Board of the NFL.

The dust has yet to
settle because the Ethics and Disciplinary Committee of the Nigeria
Football Federation (NFF) ruled that NFL, as presently constituted, is
illegal.

The committee
insists that investors should refrain from dealing with the NFL, as the
electoral committee failed to authenticate the eligibility of
candidates who vied for offices.

Apparently
undaunted the committee’s decision, Owumi appears determined to forge
ahead in changing the fortunes of the NFL, as he has just initiated a
roadmap for the league’s transformation.

On efforts to
repackage the league, Owumi said: “We have approached some events
managers and we challenged them to generate ideas on how to transform
the league and get soccer fans back to the stands.

“As part of our
plans, we intend to explore how we can make fans utilise some of the
infotainment facilities at some of the stadiums used for the FIFA World
Youth Championship in 1999 to encourage fans to come to stadiums by
showing English Premiership matches ahead of our league matches.

“This means the
ticket that brings a fan into a stadium entitles him to watch English
Premiership matches that would be shown live on the stadium’s big
screens.

“We also intend to
use some local musicians, cultural entertainment and raffle draws to
mobilise fans to the stands. These are ideas we are trying to fine-tune
to get the league up and running again,” Owunmi said.

In a recent tour of
the German Bundesliga by five Nigerian journalists, sponsored by
SuperSports, the stadiums of two German football clubs — Kaisaslautern
and Mainz 05 — were filled to capacity, evoking memories of those days
when fans thronged Onikan, Nnamdi Azikiwe and Sharks stadiums to watch
quality league matches.

Segun Fayose, Head
of Communications, MultiChoice, a pay TV which has secured the rights
to show Nigerian league matches on its platform, said that plans are
underway to woo soccer fans back to stadiums.

He noted that the
Bundesliga tour was part of an “understudy trip undertaken to see how
Germans were able to transform their league to become a money-spinner.

“As right holders
to the league, we have a duty not only to fill the stadiums but also to
provide visibility for clubs in the league.

“We are doing that
for the South African League and we are doing it for the NFL. We are
mindful of the huge market which Nigeria has,” Fayose said, adding that

“If we can do it in South Africa, why not here. It is achievable and
don’t forget the fact that if there is a will, there is a way,” he said.

Click to Read More Sports Stories

Concessionaire claims sufficient fund for Lagos-Ibadan road

Concessionaire claims sufficient fund for Lagos-Ibadan road

Bi-Courtney
Highways Services Limited, the concessionaire of the Lagos-Ibadan
expressway, has said it does not have financial constraints concerning
the road construction.

Wale Babalakin, the Bi-Courtney Group chairman, added that the financial hurdle has been conquered.

Mr. Babalakin spoke
at a press conference and site visit yesterday at the Ojota end of the
expressway. “Work commenced on that road on (last) Friday. Work
commenced with the phenomenal movement of equipment. We are getting
other people involved, especially before the flag off,” he said.

He added that the
company will raise all the required funding, largely through equity and
long term loans. He drew inference from the proposed national budget of
N4.5 trillion for next year, declaring that, “the value of outstanding
work going on in Nigeria today, in the road industry, from what I
gathered, is over N1 trillion. The budget for next year, for road, is
N117 billion.”

“What this means is
that no road will have more than 10 percent of the cost of doing it
next year, which means assuming there is no escalation, it would take
another 10 years to build an average federal road. This is why we can
then understand why it took over 10 years to do Ibadan to Oyo; why it
will take over 10 years to do Ogbomosho to Ilorin, the Abuja to Okene
road, and so on. It will take over 10 years to do any major road in
Nigeria,” he said.

“This is why the
only way out is to reconstruct the road on concession. It is not
whether you like it or not, it is just the logical way out. We have to
get the private sector actively involved,” he added.

The concession is a
Public-Private Partnership project between the federal ministry of
works and Bi-Courtney, under the Design-Build-Operate-Transfer scheme,
with no monetary costs to the government.

Cost still unknown

“We got the letter
of intent, May 27, 2007. After that, it took two years to get a
concession signed. As we speak, we don’t have the right of way, it is
yet to be cleared and handed over to us. However, we have decided that
despite the constraints, we will start,” Mr. Babalakin said.

He added that
modern expressway services and facilities will be introduced, such as
dawn lighting, improved and new interchanges, a new drainage system,
recesses service areas, lay-by emergency parking areas, footbridges in
heavy pedestrian areas, weighbridges, electronic traffic control,
obligatory or informative signs, trailer parks, motels, and gas
supplies, among others. Road users will subsequently pay tolls on the
road, which will be operated and maintained by the company for 25
years, the duration of the concession. The number of toll gates is not
yet determined, though.

The firm said the
project would be in phases, with the first phase consisting of three
lanes from Lagos to Ibadan. The final phase would have four lanes on
each carriageway from Shagamu to Ibadan, but all these are subject to
traffic study.

Mr. Babalakin, however, declined to disclose the exact amount the
contract is worth currently, after the designs amendment, saying, “An
agent does not reveal figures. The federal government will let us know
the figures in due time.”

Click to Read more Financial Stories

Stanbic IBTC to launch more customised products

Stanbic IBTC to launch more customised products

As Nigeria’s huge
unbanked population steadily migrates to the formal banking system,
Stanbic IBTC Bank Plc, a member of the Standard Bank Group, has
restated that it will continue to offer new and innovative products and
solutions aimed at meeting the demands of the various segments of the
market.

Tolu Oladipo, the
bank’s head of personal banking, noted that the Nigerian financial
market is extensive and expanding, a situation that demands consistent
evaluation to identify potential customers, their needs, and
aspirations, as well as supporting these with the appropriate products
and solutions.

Mr. Oladipo said
Stanbic IBTC already has an array of product and service solutions,
including Stanbic IBTC Home Loans product and Vehicle and Asset Finance
product, among others, targeted at a diverse customer segment, to
ensure that all customers will have access to the best products and
services wherever they are and whenever they desire it.

“Awareness of our
products is growing rapidly in the market, driven by our significant
expansion within the country. Since the beginning of the year, we have
rolled out more than 70 points of representation nationwide, and we
expect to see this trend continuing over the next few years.

“In addition to this, our growth is fuelled by the strength of our
brand as well as the quality of service we strive to continue to
deliver to our customers,” he said.

Click to Read more Financial Stories

Samsung offers solution for high rise buildings

Samsung offers solution for high rise buildings

Samsung Electronics
West Africa, in partnership with Dajcom Limited, on Tuesday, unveiled a
new line-up of Samsung air conditioning systems. The Samsung Digital
Variable Multi commercial air conditioners systems, in addition to the
existing Samsung air conditioning range, was introduced to key
influencers and customers at an upscale event tagged ‘Digital Air
Solutions Forum’ in Lagos. The event coincided with the annual Nigerian
Institute of Architects Day.

Samsung Digital Air
Solutions Forum is another pioneering initiative from the Samsung
brand. Speaking at the event, the managing director, Samsung
Electronics Nigeria, Idy Enang, said, “It is our tradition at Samsung
Electronics to improve the standard of living of the populace, both in
the private and commercial sectors. One way we have achieved this is in
the air conditioners business.”

Due to the
emergence of numerous high rise buildings in need of centralized air
conditioners and the departure from the Chiller AC system, Samsung
Electronics West Africa has decided to introduce the Samsung DVM Air
Conditioners.

Also speaking at
the event, managing director, Dajcom Limited, David Safa, said his
company was thrilled to be part of the launch.

Click to Read more Financial Stories