Nigeria Content Online

Last year,
Electronic Arts made the golfing great share the cover of his
bestselling game with Northern Irish rookie Rory McIlroy for the first
time ever. This year, following the controversy away from the green and
lackluster play on it, Woods has been dropped from the cover of the
March 29th release of “Tiger Woods PGA Tour 12: The Masters” on Xbox
360, PlayStation 3 and Wii. Woods has been replaced with a shot of the
iconic yellow flag at Augusta National Golf Club, which is a major
focus for the new game. Woods will appear on the PlayStation 3
Collector’s Edition of the game, which will cost $10 more and include
five additional courses.

EA Sports has
worked with Woods since 1999 on what once was a perennial bestselling
title. But last year, sales of the game dropped in the U.S. and around
the globe dramatically. According to videogame analyst David Cole of
DFC Intelligence, sales of “Tiger Woods PGA Tour 11” were down 50% to
60% on a worldwide basis from 2009.

While EA stood by
their cover athlete, they did not work with him to promote the game
last year. Traditionally, Woods does media interviews and appearances
to launch each new game.

“The thing about
golf is the whole business is tied to Tiger,” said Cole. “TV viewership
was also down over 30%. If Woods wins, viewership should increase. With
the overall sport being so tied to Tiger I don’t see EA parting ways in
the near future. However, you could be less likely to see a major
emphasis on Tiger.”

“The sales issues
of the Tiger Woods video game are much broader and deeper than Tiger’s
personal problems and has more to do with the entire golf sport
struggling in 2010,” said Jesse Divnich, Vice president of Electronic
Entertainment Design and Research.

Golf’s decline is linked to Tigers’

He continued: “Of
course, one could argue the decline in the interest of golf has to do
with Tiger’s extended absence and returned poor performance. But even
if that was true, it says a lot about the PGA Tour and their
over-reliance on one person to carry the whole league. PGA exposed
itself to this risk and now is facing the consequences.”

During a media
conference call to discuss the new game, EA Sports President Peter
Moore said that the game publisher is standing by the former number one
golfer in the world.

“If the insinuation
is it’s a reflection of EA Sports backing away from its relationship
that goes back literally 13 years with Tiger, that’s not the case
whatsoever,” said Moore. “You shouldn’t read anything into the fact
that Tiger’s not featured on the box art of that particular
edition…Tiger is right there on the PS3 version of the game with Move
support, which was very good for us and Sony last year. We’ll continue
that.” “Obviously,

it was a difficult
year last year, but you saw toward the end of the season Tiger starting
to get back to his old ways,” said Moore. “We all, as both a sports
industry and sports fans are hopeful he comes back in full force in
2011.”

Tiger will remain a
featured playable character in the new game, along with 20 other
professional golfers like 2007 Masters Champion Zach Johnson and Bubba
Watson, a Team USA member of the 2010 Ryder Cup – Team USA.

Jim Nantz and David Feherty will call the action in a new television broadcast presentation for the game.

Electronic Arts has
spent the past year focusing on bringing The Masters to its game
franchise for the first time. The studio employed new laser scanning
technology to scan every hole, bush and tree of Augusta National Golf
Club.

“I am very happy
and excited that the Masters Tournament is featured in the Tiger Woods
PGA Tour game,” said Woods in a statement. “There are many new and
unique elements in the game that will make everyone feel like they’re
really competing at Augusta National. This is great for the sport and
will connect a new audience with the Masters, a tournament I’ve been
fortunate to experience since 1995.” If The Masters fails to give Woods
the necessary sales boost, Electronic Arts might end up joining the
long list of sponsors like Gillette, AT&T, Accenture,

and Gatorade that
have parted ways with him. Divnich doesn’t believe focusing more on the
Masters will strengthen sales. “Everything correlates back to the level
of interest in golf,” said Divnich.

REUTERS

China’s Yao Ming
says he might end his basketball career next year if the injury to his
left foot does not heal properly by the end of the NBA season, state
media reported on Tuesday. The Houston Rockets centre, who missed last
season after surgery on his left foot, also confirmed that he was
unlikely to play in the London Olympics in 2012.

The seven-time NBA
All Star, scheduled to return to the Rockets for the start of the
2010-11 season, is recovering from surgery for an injury the Rockets’
team doctor described as “career-threatening.”

The injury, which
occurred during a May 2009 game, was the latest in a series of physical
problems which have blighted an NBA career that began when Yao was the
first overall draft pick by the Rockets in 2002.

“If the foot injury
does not heal next season, I might choose to call it quits,” he was
quoted as saying last weekend by state news agency Xinhua.

The seven-foot
six-inch (2.28m) Yao exercised the player option in his contract with
the Rockets last month to avoid free agency and expects to be ready for
pre-season training. Still China’s most popular and wealthiest
sportsman despite a year on the sidelines, Yao said before the Beijing
Olympics that he was unlikely to play for his country at another Games.

“The chance (to
play in London) is very little. The foot injury will not allow me to
play so many games anymore,” he said. “As an athlete, I am not the
future of China basketball anymore.” Yao, who will turn 30 in
September, also criticised China’s lack of focus on development of
young basketball talent before the Beijing Olympics.

“We are paying for
what we didn’t do leading up to 2008,” he said. “We skipped the
development of a reserve team and the CBA league and focused only on
the national team and the Olympics. It’s like you are killing the goose
that lays the golden egg.”

Reuters

The
year 2011 has started but the state of the National Women Football
League in still in confusion and uncertainty. Women’s football started
in Nigeria in the late 1970s, but it was not until the 1980s that it
really became a fixture of the local football scene. The pioneers
included Simbiat Babes and Jegede Babes and it was from these teams
that players were picked for the first women’s national football team
in 1990.

Whereas the
national women’s teams have been doing well in international
competitions, the local league that is supposed to serve as the
reservoir for the teams has been rendered comatose because of a lot of
negative happenings between the administrators, club owners and the
players.

Mere shadow

The League has
since become a shadow of its former self as the neglect from the
football body and various bickering has plunged the body into the
doldrums. Neglected by the mother body, the Nigerian Football
Federation (NFF) and differing voices on who is in the best position to
administer the League, has culminated in the women’s league sliding
into a comatose state.

The call for equal
representation In the past, there has been agitation for better
treatment of women in football but these calls it seems have gone
unheeded by the football federation. Henritta Ukaigbe, a prominent
female football commentator said: “In times past, there have been
agitations to make the female league more viable but it seems that
right now, the game is going to be further neglected or even
forgotten.” For the women’s game to get better there must be adequate
representation by the real stake-holders in decision making process in
administering the game. One way by which this could be achieved is by
having representation in the NFF. The elections held in August 2010
produced a board shorn of any woman. To make certain of this
representation, the NFF board has set aside a date for fresh elections
on January 28, 2011.

The news apparently
sounds good, but it is not satisfying to those who manage the women and
who own the clubs. The Women Football Club Owners is against one of the
guidelines set by the NFF. The said guideline stipulates that only
women could contest positions on the Women Football League Board. This
is not good news as it means that male club owners who are directly
involved with the women are not eligible to contest.

Unfair guidelines

According to Peter
Oguche, Chairman of Oguche Babes of Lokoja, such a guideline is
baseless. “No woman is funding a female football club today in Nigeria;
the club owners are all men therefore the NFF should not dictate to us
that the board must be for women only.” Another club manager, John Zaki
of Tin City Queens further buttressed the point being made by Oguche.
“For some time now, no women have been involved in the management of
football at the league level. Before there was Jegede Babes and
Omidiran Babes which were owned by women but now the clubs are no
longer functioning. If there are no women owners at the league level,
how are they to know what the problems actually are?” Speaking on the
same board representation, Ogochukwu Atube, a club less female player
said, “It does not matter if the people representing us are either men
or women. The important thing is that we have fair representation that
would benefit the players and develop the league.” A postponement to
eternity The club owners seem to be happy that the league has been
postponed and hope that all modalities will be put in place for the
commencement. According to Eddington Kuejebola, proprietor of Ufuoma
Babes, he said:

“It is to make sure
that they have all modalities in place so that there will be no
logistics problems. It can be recalled that about two years ago, it was
reported that the league secretary, Danlami Alalana, said that some
clubs would be face relegation if they did not appear for their
matches. And it is because of this statement that most of these clubs
withdrew from the league.” Though it seems this time that the NFF has
acceded to the request of the club owners but instead of putting a time
frame on the extension, the NFF has decided to postpone the start of
the league indefinitely. This further goes to confirm the apparent
pessimistic view with which the NFF views the female game in the
country.

Uncertainty reins

Macbeth Esezobor,
proprietor of the Macbeth Queens football club when spoken to last week
dismissed the starting of the league saying, “Do not be surprised if
the league which they announced would begin in January does not start.
Another person expressing this same lack of confidence is a football
player, Ogochukwu Atube, “We (the players) have been put in a state of
limbo.

We don’t even know
what is going on now. I think I would go and do something else, the
people at the helm of affairs just want to kill the game.” The need for
sponsorship For a League to be tagged a professional one, there is the
need to have sponsorship. However, in the past six years, the league
has suffered from a lack of sponsorship. “At the time we had the
sponsorship of Pepsi, female football was very exciting but now
everything is really boring”, says Atube. Tewogboye Oyewole, proprietor
of Tewo Queens decried the inattention that the women have faced at the
administrative level.

Ayo Omidiran,
proprietor the defunct Omidiran Babes of Oshogbo, also said that the
structure which holds the league needs to be strengthened. “A
professional league without sponsors is not really professional. It is
even worse than an amateur league. When the sponsorship problem is
resolved, then the other solutions to the various challenges will fall
into place.

“For some time now,
the club owners have been responsible for the funding of their
respective clubs and the NFF being the administrators of football in
Nigeria should know the amount of money that is required to keep a club
afloat.” So with all the pessimism and uncertainty relating to the
female league, it is actually correct to say that women football on the
local scene is gradually being squeezed to death.

Peace and harmony
appear to have become extinct in Nigerian football after the recent
face-off between the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) and the Nigeria
Premier League (NPL).

The round leather game has been hit by crisis after crisis in recent times with the trend becoming worse in the last two years.

If it’s not members
of the football federation slugging it out with one another over travel
allowances or positions within in-house committees, it will be the NFF
engaging in a war of words with other members of the football
community. The second half of 2010 was particularly plagued by crises,
which made nonsense of any efforts to administer the game.

Some of the
conflicts have spilled into this New Year, with combatants heading to
the courts — most notably Harrison Jalla and his National Association
of Nigerian Footballers (NANF), dragging the NFF to court over the
legitimacy of its current board led by Aminu Maigari.

There is also the
case over who should be the Premier League’s title sponsor. Globacom
had filed a suit at a Federal High Court in Lagos after the NPL awarded
the sponsorship right to rivals telecommunication company MTN. Globacom
is claiming amongst other things that, MTN did not participate in the
bid process and therefore, cannot be named league sponsor.

NFF versus Owumi

By far the biggest rift presently engulfing Nigerian football is undoubtedly the face-off between the NFF and Davidson Owumi.

Owumi, a former
Nigeria international whose entire club career were with club sides
based in Nigeria, was last year elected chairman of the NPL. But the
NFF, at the end of its last General Assembly in Uyo, the Akwa Ibom
State capital on December 29, 2010, announced that he was no longer the
head of the league body as he was not qualified, in the first instance,
to contest in the election that had ushered him into office.

In reaching this
verdict, the NFF based its decision on the ruling of an Arbitration
Panel headed by Akin Ibidapo-Obe, an associate professor of law from
the University of Lagos and set up by the immediate past board headed
by Sani Lulu.

The NFF board under
Lulu had set up the panel as a means of resolving the imbroglio that
ensued following Owumi’s emergence as the chairman of the NPL at the
end of the league body’s May 8, 2010 election.

Victor Baribote,
who had vied for the post of NPL chairman at the May 8 polls, albeit
unsuccessfully, along with current Kaduna State Commissioner of Sports,
Mohammed Abdul-Azeez, had appealed against Owumi’s election saying he
was not qualified to vie for a position within the NPL. Abdul-Azeez was
the General Manager of the Kaduna State government-owned Ranch Bees at
the time of the election.

They based their argument on the grounds that Owumi was not the head of any of the country’s Premier League sides.

Owumi had
previously been the CEO of Enugu Rangers, a club he had played for, and
it was from that position that he to become the chairman of the Club
Owners Association, a body consisting of over 50 professional club
sides.

However, he was no
longer the Rangers boss in the months leading up to the NPL election
but after signifying his intention to run for a position within the
board of the NPL, his nomination forms were endorsed by his successor,
Paul Chibuzor thus confirming Owumi, even if not explicitly, as a
member of the Rangers board.

Owumi’s endorsement
was however denounced by Sam Onyishi, who was the chairman of the
Rangers Management Board, the club’s holding company. Onyishi, later
did a U-turn on his earlier decision and eventually sent a letter
endorsing Owumi’s nomination after the expiration of the deadline.

Some, however,
argued that the NPL recognised the initial endorsement letter from
Chibuzor as the league body only does business directly with the club
and not with the holding company.

But even if that
was the case and Owumi was a member of the Rangers board at the time of
the election, Baribote’s argument is that even though he was still the
chairman of the Club Owners Association and later the Chairman of
Chairmen, Owumi was no longer the CEO of Rangers, and as such, was not
in a position to vie for the post of NPL chairman.

But did the NPL election guidelines state that only club bosses should vie for the post of NPL chairman?

“There is nowhere
in the election guidelines where it was stated that only chairmen of
Premier League clubs can become chairman of the NPL,” said Emeka Nwani,
the media officer of the league body. “Anybody, so long as he has been
endorsed by a club was free to contest.” Nwani’s view is similar to
that of Paul Bassey, a sports journalist and member of the media
committees of FIFA and CAF.

Reneging on an agreement?

Writing in his
weekly column in a Nigerian newspaper, Bassey, who was initially the
secretary of the Electoral Committee set up to oversee the May 8 NPL
election before being removed following petitions from those who said
he was a close friend of Oyuki Obaseki, a former chairman of the NPL,
noted that Baribote and Abdul-Azeez “were at the NPL Congress which
took place on January 20, 2010 at the La Monde Hotel in Abuja where
decisions were made to streamline election guidelines.”

One of the
decisions taken at the meeting which had in attendance representatives
of all the 20 Premier League clubs, according to Bassey, was that owing
to the disparity in the composition of the management committees of the
various clubs, with some of them having chairmen while others had sole
administrators or general managers, “the NPL Congress decided that any
member of management or executive committee of any club was free to
contest election as chairman of chairmen.”

And it was through
that platform, as the chairman of chairmen, that Owumi rose to become
the NPL’s boss before the subsequent appeals filed by Baribote and
Abdul-Azeez.

However, in line
with the Standard Electoral Code (SEC) of FIFA, the NPL set up an
Appeal Committee which, after going through the matter, confirmed Owumi
as the chairman of the NPL which, according to Article 12 (4)
explicitly states that “the decisions of the election appeal committee
are final and may not be monitored by any government body.”

A similar view is
also to be found in the NPL’s 2010 Election Guidelines under Article G
(iii) which states that: “Decisions of the Electoral Appeals Committee
shall be final.”

It was however at
this point, especially with Baribote threatening to go to court over
the decision, that the Lulu-led NFF board opted to set up the
Ibidapo-Obe led Arbitration Panel.

There are however those who feel the decision of the panel does not supersede those of the NPL’s Appeal Committee.

“The electoral
guidelines used in conducting the election was accepted (by the NFF)
and it is clearly stipulated in the guidelines that any dispute should
be referred to the Appeal Committee which sat on the case and upheld
the outcome,” said Ahmed Gara-Gombe, a former boss of the Gombe State
FA.

“But they (the NFF)
set up a panel which in reality was just a consultative body, and this
panel said that the election should be annulled. This cannot be because
the NPL Congress accepted the outcome of the election only for someone
else to annul it,” added Gara-Gombe who traced the origin of the
annulment to Owumi’s rift with the Lulu-led NFF.

Origins of the rift

In September 2007,
the NFF suspended some NPL officials including Obaseki, his deputy,
Shehu Gusau and the secretary Salisu Abubakar after both bodies failed
to agree on who had the right to appoint referees for league matches
ahead of the commencement of the 2007/2008 Premier League season. The
suspensions ranged from two to three years.

Owumi was also
slammed with a three-year suspension after he spoke out against the
NFF’s decision. The suspension was later reduced to six months with
effect from October 2, 2007, and it ended in April 2008. But since that
incident, the relationship between Owumi and Lulu deteriorated.

“That is the reason
for setting up the panel because with his emergence as the chairman of
the NPL Owumi automatically became the second vice-chairman of the NFA
(or vice-president of the NFF),” continued Gara-Gombe.

“Don’t forget that
Lulu was back then still keen on getting re-elected and it wouldn’t
have augured well for him to now have someone who would stand in his
way as his deputy. But I’m not surprised that the people now in the NFA
decided to now uphold the illegal decision of the panel because they
are all birds of a feather.” Going by FIFA’s electoral code and the
articles in the guidelines of both the NFF and NPL, the NFF’s
Arbitration Panel may after all have been illegal.

This is partly
because the NFF had sent observers to monitor the NPL election and no
anomaly was reported. Also, two current serving board members of the
NFF — Enyimba’s chairman Felix Anyansi-Agwu and Referees’ Committee
chairman Suleiman Muazu — were members of the NPL’s Electoral Committee
that ushered in Owumi.

“I am baffled by it
all,” was Owumi’s reaction when NEXT got across to him via telephone,
“But I have said all I wanted to say on the matter. There is nothing
else to say that I had not already said through the statement I made
available to the press,” added Owumi before politely asking to be
excused as he was in a meeting.

The statement Owumi
was referring to was the one he released on December 30 in which he
said, amongst other things, that he remains the NPL boss adding that
the Congress of the NPL had earlier met and confirmed his position on
the Premier League board.

He also stated that he objected to the Arbitration Panel especially as the NPL had “already taken a decision on the matter.”

Regardless of who
is right or wrong, the only logical route to take is for all parties
involved to reach an amicable settlement as the victims at the end of
the day could be the players and the coaches of Premier League sides; a
league that appears to be gradually picking momentum thanks to certain
innovations recently instituted by the new leadership of the NPL.

Whether the league will continue to blossom without the NPL’s head
remains to be seen but according to Obaseki, “It is a step in the wrong
direction and it will do no one any good… I just pray that this
brewing crisis doesn’t spill over because if it spills over, then we
are in for another round of crisis.”

Africa’s youngsters
yesterday began their quest for honours in the African U-17
Championship; Rwanda 2011. The tournament which runs through January
22, 2011 also serves as the continent’s qualifiers for the FIFA Cadet
World Cup and for the umpteenth time, Nigeria is missing in action.

It would recalled
that the Golden Eaglets failed in their bid at qualifying for the event
after being knocked out of the race by the cadet team from the
Democratic Republic of Congo, the tie which they lost 3-1 over two legs.

The country was
also in a similar situation in 2008 as it failed to make it to the
Algiers 2009 edition under coach Alphonsus Dike who after winning the
first leg 2-0 in Port Harcourt surprisingly lost 0-3 to Benin Republic
in the return leg and thus crashed out of the qualifiers only to
qualify for the World Cup by virtue of being host.

For many, the
continuous ouster of the U-17 national team from the African tournament
is unacceptable going by the abundant talents that abound in the
country and the exceptional performances recorded in the past at this
stage both on the continent and in the world. Nigeria and Brazil have
the highest number of FIFA U-17 World Cup titles (3) and the Golden
Eaglets have two African titles to their credit.

Playing by the rules

While accepting the
responsibility for his team’s failure, coach of the Golden Eaglet’s,
Monday Odigie, says he still prides himself for daring to do things
differently by sticking to strictly football players who were under 17
years of age.

“Tournaments like
the U-17 is a developmental programme in which talents are to be
discovered and nurtured, it shouldn’t be all about winning. That, I
believe, is the only way we can find capable replacements for our aging
players. My ambition was to qualify the team but as it turned out, we
were not able to make it at the long run,” he said.

He continued: “For
the very first time, we had a team of players majorly drawn from
secondary schools and academies across the country and there was no
single player playing in the league as it used to be the case before. I
would have been happy to see them showcase their talents at the Africa
Championships like their other mates.” he said

Looking ahead

Already, Odigie
revealed that he has submitted his new set of programmes to the Nigeria
Football Federation and only expecting their go-ahead to begin
preparations in earnest for future engagements.

“I am always an
advocate of early preparations and that I believe is the key to
succeeding. We have seen and learnt from the mistakes of the past and
we would want to guide against that in our future endeavours,” he said.

Despite the earlier
setback, Odigie maintained that he would stick to playing by the rules;
which is to use only players still within the specified age-limit.

“If you know me
well, you would see me at different locations where youth tournaments
are been played like the Principals’ Cup, Shell Cup etc, those are
examples of tournaments where one can get genuinely young talents and
that is what we will be doing not just going for old players all in the
name of getting results,” Odigie reiterated.

Previously touted
to assist Super Eagles coach Samson Siasia, Odigie says he has been
using his time to better his knowledge of the game with refresher
courses here and there.

Defending the crown

Meanwhile, as the
ninth edition of the CAF U-17 Championship finally kicked off in Rwanda
yesterday, Lamin Sambou, Gambian U-17 coach, says he has no doubt his
team will retain the African crown. The Baby Scorpions are the
defending champions of the biennial cadet championship, and following
an initial triumph on home soil in 2005, Sambou says his charges are
ready for the challenge backed by a 10-day training camp in Egypt.

For the Baby
Scorpions trainer, the preparations in Egypt has placed them in a good
stead to complete a hat-trick of triumphs, making them the first-ever
country to achieve that feat.

“This is a strong
team in all departments. I have been working with these boys day and
night and I know what they are each capable of giving for their
country,” Sambou was quoted by West Coast Radio, a local radio station.

“We have great confidence in our team and our chances in Rwanda,” he added.

The Gambians will
begin their defence against Congo today; play Mali 72-hours later
before engaging Cote d’Ivoire on January 15 for a place at the next
round.

Knowing very well
that a place at the last four automatically earns them a spot at the
FIFA U-17 World Cup slated for Mexico later in the year, Sambou assured
that his charges will go all out to realize that dream.

“We will certainly qualify,” he declared in a confident tone. In the other match for today, Cote d’Ivoire will take on Mali

The news of Uche Okafor’s death is numbing. It is heart rending particularly given the nature of his demise.

Coming so after
soon the death of Emmanuel Ogoli, the Ocean Boys defender who slumped
during a match and later died on his way to hospital, it unnerves one
completely.

As a journalist and
football fan,I did not have a personal relationship with him. Our
meetings were always formal and professional; however I developed a
strong liking for the cool and professional way he went about his
business on the pitch.

As a footballer, he
always tried his best and was not one to begrudge his more illustrious
colleagues in the national team their good fortune in having more
regular playing time in the squad. Uche always had a smile even though
it appeared a tad mischievous sometimes.

His Eagles team
mates, crushed by his death, have all spoken of his innate goodness.
Emeka Ezeugo in particular says he was not only a jolly good fellow but
was often the squad’s safety valve of sorts:

“I remember those
days we used to play together, on an off the pitch he was fun to be
with. Back then in the dressing room he cracked jokes that make us all
laugh and ease the tension in us,” Ezeugo said speaking shortly after
news of Uche’s death broke.

So, what happened
to him? How could a man so full of life, who never missed an
opportunity to come home from the United States where he was based and
mingle with his former teammates and joining them in whatever programme
they initiated, be found hanging in his room?

Doing the right thing

When on October 19
last year, Ezeugo and other Eagles of Aba extraction marched against
kidnapping and other violent crimes in Abia State, Uche joined them.

I saw Uche several
times on television either working as a pundit or commenting on one
issue or another affecting Nigerian football; there was no hint that
there was anything wrong with him. He appeared the normal Uche we had
always known.

It’s going to be
difficult for his colleagues to live down his death. It is always hard
to take when someone suddenly exits this life in his prime. Had Uche
been manic depressive or had suffered from one ailment or the other,
his friends and fans would at least have had time to prepare. As it is,
he looked perfectly normal.

Which naturally
raises the question: was he murdered? Is there more to his death than
has become immediately apparent? Did he have issues with anyone that
would lead such individual or individuals to do him harm?

Thankfully, he
lived and died in a society where the police take issues of crime
prevention and detection seriously. If there was anything untoward
about his death, we can at least count on the police there to get to
the bottom of it. While that may not bring Uche back to life, his
family, his Super Eagles colleagues and his fans here in Nigeria can at
least feel satisfied that justice will be done.

On the other hand,
should it turn out that he had indeed taken his own life then it raises
different questions entirely. Suicide is alien to us as a people. For
us Nigerians, there are cultural safety nets, which prevent us from
going over the precipice. Our familial connexions strained as they have
become by our worsening economic situation still provide avenues for
ventilation of pent up frustrations. Whether he explored this option,
we may never know.

In the interim, we
mourn a man who served his country diligently, a man not afraid to add
his voice to the clamour for decent living and the right of his kinsmen
to live in comfort and security.

Like Ndubuisi
Okosieme, one of his colleagues in the Eagles 1988 Nations Cup squad
has said, Nigeria should treat him fairly even in death. It is the
responsibility of us all to ensure that his immediate family is not
forgotten once he has been committed to the earth. His burial even
should not be a family affair alone. He served Nigeria and served it
well and so the nation needs to send him off in a befitting manner.