Nigeria Content Online

Andreas Seiter, a
Senior Health Specialist with the World Bank, Washington, on Friday
pledged the bank’s support for the National Agency for Food and Drug
Administration and Control (NAFDAC).

Mr Seiter made the
pledge during a courtesy visit on the management of NAFDAC in Lagos,
saying the bank is ready to assist the agency to clean up the country’s
drug system.

The World Bank
official noted that Africa is the continent with the highest cases of
counterfeit drugs in the world. He said that the World Bank is willing
to render financial and technical assistance to the agency in order to
strengthen efforts to combat the sale of counterfeit drugs in Nigeria.

“A pharmaceutical
industry that comes from a country with a good regulatory body will
find it much easier to sell its drugs across the border,” he said.

Dr Dinesh Nair,
also with the World Bank, Nigeria, said that the partnership will
ensure that NAFDAC continue to play an effective role in certifying the
quality of imported drugs, food and cosmetics.

Adamawa
Agricultural Development Programme (ADP) announced on Friday that the
state recorded more than 75 per cent of bumper harvest in 2010 compared
to 60 per cent achieved in 2009.

The Programme
Manager, Mustapha Raji, told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Yola,
that the achievement was recorded due to the support and intervention
projects introduced by the state government and other agencies.

‘‘The Sassakawa
Global 2000, the Fadama III, Component IV and CBARDP projects have
contributed immensely to the increase in agricultural production in the
state,” Mr Raji said.

He noted that the
progress was made in spite of the late rainfall which prevented early
planting. “In 2010, the rain came in late both in the northern and
southern parts of the state which affected early planting. Most farmers
planted in July when rain started and even those who planted early in
the southern part, they re-planted again due to inadequate moisture,’’
Mr Raji said.

Consumer prices in
Djibouti rose by 0.5 percent in December, compared with a fall of 0.5
percent a month earlier, pushing the annual inflation rate to 2.8
percent, official data showed on Sunday.

The Statistics and
Demographic Studies Directorate said food prices in December rose by
0.1 percent against the previous month, while housing, water,
electricity, gas and fuel costs rose by 1.7 percent and transport costs
climbed by 0.8 percent.

The annual rate of inflation in 2009 came out at 2.2 percent.

South Africa
government’s bonds fell sharply on Friday, driving yields to their
highest level in 7 months after Central Bank comments on rising
inflation pressures dented prospects of interest rates cuts.

The bond sell-off,
a day after the Reserve Bank left its repo rate steady at 5.5 percent,
weighed on the rand, pushing the currency to a near 8-week low against
the dollar at one stage.

Stocks ended
higher, snapping two days of declines as firmer commodity prices and
upbeat global equities lifted sentiment, with technicals pointing to
further gains.The yield on the benchmark 2015 bond soared to 7.905
percent, up 22.5 basis points from Thursday’s close and reaching its
highest level since early July 2010.“The Reserve Bank left rates
unchanged and the market feels they are now looking ahead and seeing
higher inflation. It looks like there will not be any more rate
cutting,” a bond dealer in Johannesburg said.

Last Friday, Nigeria made a successful debut at the
international bond market with the 10 year $500 million Eurobond massive
subscription. The issue was 2.5 times oversubscribed, translating to about
$1.25 billion. This is coming after initial apprehension about the
attractiveness of the bond on the back of mismanagement of huge income from oil
over the last one year.

In an interview before the deal closed that day, the finance
minister, Olusegun Aganga, said that he had spoken with over 40 investors and
the response to the bond had been overwhelmingly assuring. Mr. Aganga dismissed
reports that some investors had doubts about the viability of the issue. The
report suggested that the alleged mismanagement of Nigeria’s Excess Crude
Account (ECA) had caused potential investors to shun the country’s first bond
issue.

Mr. Aganga, who was in New York as part of the road show to market
the bond, said that the Excess Crude Account barely featured in the questions
the investors were asking. “There is absolutely no correlation between the
Excess Crude Account and what we have set out to achieve with the bond,” he
said. “In reality, 42 per cent of that goes into investment in power such as
the NIPP project which has been allocated N8 billion.”

Excess Crude Account

He said that the Excesss Crude Account was a necessity for
states to invest in major capital projects but refused to comment on
allegations that many states had not remitted the money accordingly.

“The investors were far more interested in economic and other
fiscal factors. They were fairly consistent in their questions which were
mostly about political stability, exchange rates, the budget, levels of
production and the quality of our loan book.”

He said that modern investors were extremely sophisticated and
Nigeria represented a very attractive opportunity for those looking for healthy
diversity in their portfolios.

The finance minister added that a large number showed interest
in the Euro Bond.

“However it is not just anybody with money that will be able to
invest. We need to vet each investor’s suitability as well.”

A highly elated Aganga, after the close of the book, said the
issue was a major milestone for Nigeria. “More remarkable is the exceptional
quality and diversity of investors from 18 countries spanning Europe, the US,
Asia and Africa.

Investors are impressed by Nigeria’s credit story and were very
keen to participate in the offering.”

Mr Aganga said Nigerian corporate can now more easily access
well-priced long term financing from the international capital markets to fund
economic opportunities such as infrastructural development.

“We now have a transparent and internationally observable
benchmark against which international investors can accurately price risk. My
expectation is for an increase in capital inflows and FDI (foreign direct
investment) into the economy.”

The accomplishment of the bond may not necessarily translate to
much unless local corporate are able to latch on to the success recorded.

“We will commence the process of educating Nigerians on the
benefits of this bond. It is a very good thing,” the minister said in a text
message.

William Wallace, the Africa Editor of the Financial Times said
the massive investor interest in Africa has rubbed-off well on Nigeria.

“Some of the world’s fastest growing economies are on the
continent, which looks set to grow in coming years at double or more what the
developed world is. Then there is a lack of supply of African sovereign debt.
Nigeria as the second largest economy is obviously going to attract interest.”

Fiscal prudence

Mr. Wallace said current mismanagement may be due to the
elections and that fiscal prudence will improve after April. “Nigeria’s debt
profile is still far more favourable than it was a few years ago even if both
domestic and external debt has been on the rise again.”

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services on Tuesday assigned its
‘B+’ long-term senior unsecured debt rating to the bond. At the same time,
S&P assigned a recovery rating of ‘4′ to the proposed bond, indicating its
expectation of average (30 per cent to 50 per cent) recovery in the event of a
payment default.

According to S&P, the ratings are also constrained by a low
level of development and high dependence on the oil sector.

“Furthermore, we see residual risks in Nigeria’s financial
sector, although the Central Bank has addressed solvency and liquidity problems
in the banking sector,” it said.

S&P notes that even with mismanagement, Nigeria’s oil
revenues are such, with the price of oil rising, that over the 10 year period
the country will always be able to pay.

Click here for the full transcript

Earlier this month,
there were text messages alerting people to leave the Motorway Centre,
Ikeja, Lagos. The message said there was a bomb ready to explode any
moment in the area and this caused a lot of panic among Lagos
residents. In a season of bombs, many took the text seriously and the
Police Anti Bomb Squad actually moved to the premises and combed the
entire area but no bomb was found.

This is one of the
ubiquitous messages that are common with cell phone users in our
country. Funny, foolish and sexually explicit messages now dot the
landscape and subscribers seem helpless in the way they flood their
phones.

Other examples
include, “MTN is celebrating their six years in Zaria, send it to other
six people and get free 750. It is free, be sure it is from MTN to
MTN”. “If you know anyone that has money in Oceanic, Unity and
Intercontinental Bank, tell them to go and withdraw their money within
24 hours because information reaching us is that they may go on
distress soon,” says another.

But some of these
messages have had great consequence as they don’t all end the way the
Motorway Centre message did. “I saw the pictures of people queuing up
to withdraw their funds from the bank when the messages warning
customers to withdraw their funds (went round),” said Bisi Adetunji, a
graphic artists.

“A friend of mine
was able to get shots of people actually queuing up to withdraw their
funds, I actually saw that. I did not know the effect those messages
could have until I saw those pictures. It is the affected banks that
can really tell you the cost of that message.”

Intercontinental,
one of the banks responded with text messages of its own, assuring
customers that their money in its custody is safe. The Central Bank
also followed with adverts asking Nigerians to ignore the text messages.

The Nigeria
Communications Commission said last year that a nationwide SIM cards
registration would be done in a bid to enhance security and related
crimes perpetrated through mobile phones.

This, Mohammed
Yusuf a staff of a private security firm said, will enhance security as
such messages cause inconvenience to many who receive them and some
even get to the stage of being scared to use their phones. “Some are
sent by fraudulent people with dubious motives. Others would send you
messages that they are expecting some goods from the port and just need
some money to pick it up.”

Mr Yusuf suggested
that mobile service providers step up their responsibility for their
customers’ phones security so as to help them from being swindled.

Different perspective

However, some
subscribers have a different perspective saying information sharing can
actually save lives. Emmanuel Tarfa, a financial consultant said he
thinks operators can monitor the source of such messages for security
reasons only and relay the details to the security agencies.

“In a case where a
message is controversial but true, not sharing it could be dangerous to
the public. In addition, the telecom providers do not have the absolute
moral power to determine what is true or false, because Nigeria is made
up of different religions and ethnic groups, whose rights should be
protected. Their interference could mark the beginning of a censorship
campaign that could undermine the integrity of our information system
in Nigeria. Let the system regulate itself – people will eventually
learn to determine what is true or false”.

Similarly, Jito
Ogunye, a lawyer, said receiving such messages is not an infringement
of one’s privacy because the right to privacy guarantee of the
constitution cannot be stressed to cover the receipt of such text
messages.

“We live in a world
of ICT. Telephoning has become wireless so anybody that subscribes to
wireless telephony has put himself in a position to receive such
blanket messages. Now, if anyone feels that he has spent much time and
energy deleting such calls, such a fellow can sue the service provider”

However, phone operators were silent on the issue. MTN and Glo
spokespersons did not respond to enquiries. Same goes for Reuben Morka,
the NCC spokesperson.

Clearly, the leadership of the two unions in the electricity
industry think that being ideologues with regard to the privatisation of the
successor companies unbundled out of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria
(PHCN) would hold them in good stead with their followership. They are mistaken
as they are threatening the unique opportunities that will be available to the
workers in a liberalized environment in the industry.

This piece seeks to address most of the technical issues raised
so far by the unions. On behalf of the two unions in the industry, Joe Ajaero,
the General Secretary of National Union of Electricity Employees (NUEE), had
contended at a media session that “we see privatisation as jinxed. Besides
that, government has not informed us about the plan to privatise PHCN. Any time
they do, we can give them our position.” Mr. Ajaero added, “If we had been
invited to discuss privatisation or road map, we could have invited them to
take a cue from Nigeria Airways, Delta Steel, Daily Times, NITEL…We are
equally aware of what happened in the communication sector when MTN, Globacom,
Airtel came in, they never bought over NITEL.”

Fine sophistry? But the BPE will not allow the likes of Ajaero
to write its history. At the BPE, we do not claim to be perfect and we do not
pretend to have all the answers. Since 1999, over 120 transactions have been
consummated and only the four mentioned are the sore points. Can Ajaero inform
Nigerians about the successes of Eleme Petrochemical, Oando, Conoil, BCC (now
part of Dangote Cement), National Truck Manufacturing Co; Transcorp Hilton and
others?

On the matter that the unions have not been informed of
government’s intention to privatise PHCN (formerly NEPA), recall that
participation in the privatisation programme which is instituted in law through
the Public Enterprises (Privatization and Commercialization) Act No. 28 of 1999
was given tangible expression by the integration of the Nigeria Labour Congress
(NLC) into the membership of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP) which
is the highest policy and decision making body on privatisation and economic
reform in Nigeria. In the same vein, 22 labour leaders of some industrial
unions were made members of all the 11 technical and sector reforms
implementation committees of the NCP; thus, ensuring the attainment of the
desirable goals of vertical and horizontal integration of labor in the
privatisation process.

In fact, the electricity unions were members of the Electric
Power Implementation Committee of the NCP which produced the Electric Power
Policy and the Electric Power Sector Reform Bill. And Section 28 of the
Privatisation Act of 1999 lists NEPA as a candidate for privatisation. Furthermore,
the Electric Power Sector Reform Act 2005 provides for the privatisation of the
electricity utility. Let us say for the umpteenth time that BPE is implementing
the provisions of the EPSR Act.

In addition, when then Acting President Goodluck Jonathan met
with the leadership of two unions in the electricity sector last May, were they
not told about government’s desire to re-start the stalled power sector reform
programme?

Moreover, is it not disingenuous for the labour unions in the
electricity sector to, on the one hand accuse the BPE of not engaging them in
dialogue and when the opportunity is available for negotiation, they refuse to
meet with the privatisation agency? An example was on Tuesday, November 2, 2010
when the unions refused to engage with the Bureau at a meeting to discuss
labour matters under the chairmanship of the Minister of Labour.

NUEE had argued that “if the government is really serious about
the sector, it should allow the 25 licensed companies to operate alongside
PHCN, like the Nigeria Electricity Supply Company (NESCO.) NESCO has been
operating in Nigeria since 1929, generating its own electricity without taking
over PHCN.” The fact is that due to the structure of the electricity industry,
it is not possible for private operators to build their distribution facilities
to compete with the extant distribution network of Power Holding Company of
Nigeria (PHCN.)

Transmission versus
generation

It is important to note that the technology in power generation
allows for many participants unlike the technology for transmission and
distribution networks. One can set up separate generating plants using any fuel
source (hydro, gas, coal, etc) that is economically viable. At any point, you
can have many players. Transmission network is such that it is a natural
monopoly given that you cannot ask every operator to build its own transmission
network. It is uneconomic, not sensible and, in the end, counterproductive and
this is what Ajaero and NUEE is recommending to Nigeria.

In fact, the design of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry
(NESI) is such that the Transmission Service Provider (TSP) should give equal
access to generators in accordance with laid down rules. It is in order to
initiate this that the Federal Government has retained ownership of the
transmission network.

Indeed, the Electric Power Sector Reform Act of 2005 recognizes
the monopoly elements in the transmission and distribution chains of the
industry structure. That is why the law gave the Nigerian Electricity
Regulatory Commission (NERC) the power to set tariffs for both services so as
to prevent consumers from being exploited. This is what is done in all
electricity markets that are reforming.

It should be noted that the revenue that drives the entire value
chain (generation, distribution, transmission-market operator and system
operator) comes from consumers through the distribution companies. In this
regard, any reform that does not address the challenge in the distribution
network would collapse as there would not be adequate revenue to fund the rest
of the value chain (that is, generation and transmission.)

Ajaero had stated that “they claim that PHCN is inefficient and
obsolete but today, they are scrambling to take over the obsolete PHCN that
cannot deliver. Today, tariff has started going up and in the next few months,
it would go up to 300 per cent without commensurate improvement in the power
sector. We challenge the protagonists of privatisation to come and sign
agreement with the workers that tariff will remain the same for the number of
years till power generation and transmission situation improves.”

Given such comments, one wonders on whose side Ajaero and his
sympathisers are in the power sector reform programme. Is he on the side of
Nigerian consumers who are compelled to invest in self-generation, thereby
raising their tariff from an average of about eight naira per kilowatt-hour
charged by PHCN to a real cost of N80 per kilo watt hour? It is clear from
Ajaero’s remarks that he is not on the side of the long-suffering Nigerian
electricity workers and consumers but on the side of importers of generators
and diesel. Moreover, the current tariff structure has a subsidy element of
N177 billion over a three-year period (2008-2011.)

More funds needed

It is important to state that government’s annual capital outlay
(for all capital budgets) is about $6 billion whereas power alone requires $10
billion annually. In other words, annual funding requirement has already
outstripped the capacity of public sector funding. The funding requirement will
grow as the economy and population grows. And let us not forget that public
sector does poorly at efficient design, planning, funding and implementation of
any kind of infrastructure project.

The unions think they have a winner if they hinge their
opposition to privatization to tariff increases. On current tariffs, no private
operator will get involved as it is not attractive. It is only when the tariff
regime is made investor-friendly that the investments that will address our inadequacies
come on board. The unions have asserted that none of the 20 private power
companies issued licenses by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission
(NERC) to generate electricity has added a megawatt of electricity to the
national grid.

It needs to be stated that Shell, Agip and AES are all operating
IPPs and supplying power to the national grid. Shell is generating not less
than 450 MW; Agip generates 450 MW and AES produces 200MW. Shell and Agip are
oil companies who are not unduly concerned about being owed since they have
access to the oil revenue. AES is producing because they have a sovereign
guarantee. As such, if PHCN does not pay AES, the Federal Government does.
Thus, out of currently available power of 3, 500 MW, the three IPPs are generating
1,100 MW.

There is a pertinent question to also ask: who are the private
power generators going to sell to? Is it PHCN that is not financially viable
and would not be able to honour commitments? It is the recognition of this gap
in the industry structure that led the Federal Government to incorporate the
Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc, also known as the “Bulk Trader.”
Incorporated on July 29, 2010 by the BPE, the functions of the Bulk Trader are
to undertake the business of trading in the wholesale electricity market as
bulk purchaser and the bulk seller of electricity and ancillary services
pursuant to the Electric Power Sector Reform Act 2005; and to take over the
contract management and obligations of the Federal Government of Nigeria under existing
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA).

Chukwuma Nwokoh is Head of
Public Communications at the Bureau of Public Enterprises

“I lost all my savings in the stock market. My
friend told me to put everything in bank shares, I did and lost everything.
After what happened to me in 2008, I will never ever invest in the stock market
again” Seyi – Lawyer

“Don’t mention the stock market to me! Let me
just keep my money in the bank – at least it is safe – I don’t know how I will
educate my children with this 2% interest I am getting, but God is in control”
Chinedu – Trader.

Being cautious or afraid of losing money is
sensible; the problem is when the fear causes you to be paralysed into doing
nothing. Too many people continue to sit on the sidelines and have abandoned
the stock market completely having been badly burnt. Some played the market too
aggressively without a full understanding of the risk involved and the possible
consequences. Investors are most vulnerable when they let emotions come into
play. When markets nosedive, many “investors” bail out, when the markets remain
undervalued, they do nothing, and when the markets begin to soar, they regain
their confidence, jump on the bandwagon and dive back in and the cycle
continues.

It is important to understand your money
personality. Instead of investing your money in stocks or in real estate, do
you find comfort in putting all your money in the bank guaranteed investments
even though you are likely to earn interest at very low rates? If you are
totally risk averse, you can expect very little prospect of real growth as
guaranteed investments will hardly keep apace with inflation.

Regardless of what you think of the stock market,
earning 2 – 3 per cent on all your savings will make it challenging to achieve
ambitious financial goals. Depending upon your particular circumstance, your
age and time frame and your overall financial plan, consider putting at least
some portion in the capital market; this offers the best prospect of real long
term growth.

Set yourself clear goals

The best way to navigate the investment
environment is to have set goals in place and a clear plan on how to achieve
them, before you put any money down. Your plan will provide you with direction
on how to invest your money.

If you have clear goals, your focus will largely
be on accomplishing them rather than on your short, medium and long-term goals.
You will not be concerned about whatever may be happening in the short term in
the stock market, as these may include funding your children’s education or
making down-payment on your new home. Where you have concrete goals that you
are working towards, you will not be easily swayed by market volatility.

Seek professional advice

It is always useful to seek professional advice,
particularly where you don’t have the time, expertise or inclination to manage
your own investments. If you are not an experienced investor, it pays to use a
tested investment manager to help you follow through with your plan.

Not even the most skilled investment advisors in
the world could have protected investors from the recent losses suffered
globally, but an experienced team with a good track record can dispassionately
re-examine your investment goals, time frames, risk tolerance, and your current
financial situation and structure an appropriate savings and investment plan
for you.

Don’t depend solely on your investment advisor;
make every effort to build your knowledge of investing as there is a plethora
of information all around you.

Think Long
Term

One of the best ways to build sustainable wealth
is to take a long-term view of investing; this is probably one of the most
important pieces of investment advice there is. It is important to keep your
overall perspective in view and not be destabilised by market vagaries. When
you focus on the long-term, you will avoid taking drastic unplanned actions in
response to short-term news, rumour, events and emotions, which to a large
extent influence the ups and downs of the market.

Sound, well thought out investments, held over a
long period will usually weather turbulence. As a good long-term investment
plan should anticipate both good times and bad investors should be in a better
position to ride out any short-term volatility without being forced to sell at
a loss.

“Don’t put all your eggs in one basket” It is
tempting to concentrate your available funds in just one or two investments,
but this is also very risky. Build a diversified portfolio across asset classes
including stocks, bonds, cash, and property. If one investment performs badly
or fails, a variety of different types of investments are less likely to.

If you plan to invest, it is important to
separate your short-term savings from your long-term funds. Try to estimate
your cash needs and where they will come from for say the next two to three
years. Are there some large school bills looming or are you planning to retire within
the next two to three years? If you have enough cash in the money market to
tide you over any volatile periods, you will not have to liquidate investments
prematurely to provide cash to meet ongoing cash needs or in an emergency.

The money you can afford to put away for a long
period of time would be appropriate for equities and other assets with
potential long-term growth. Mutual funds from reputable financial institutions
are an ideal option and particularly attractive for those with smaller parcels of
funds to invest, as they offer both a diversified portfolio and professional
management.

Invest regularly

If you are afraid of investing at the “wrong
time” adopt a cost averaging strategy. Instead of trying to time the market,
invest on a regular basis in an appropriate vehicle, and even when your
finances are stretched. It is a particularly useful tool in a volatile market
as you can reduce the average cost of your shares by purchasing more shares
when prices are low and fewer shares when they are high. A consistent
disciplined approach takes away the speculative element of investing and
reduces stress and fear.

Learn from these unique times, the challenge for us all is to be realistic
about our expectations of the market and our investment returns. If you set
reasonable long-term profit expectations for your investments you will be more
accepting of the inevitable periods of market upheaval. If you stay the course,
and continue to build upon the foundations of a sound investment strategy, you
can achieve your financial goals.