Documenting Africa on screen
Nothing better
captures human history than a collection of information that is
indelible and images that are everlasting. For many film enthusiasts,
the moving picture medium does this best. However, within the medium,
the differentiation between the purposes of the feature and the
documentary film can not be overemphasised.
The essence of the
documentary film and the documentary film maker takes the front stage
at the iRepresent International Documentary Film Festival which ends
today at Freedom Park.
On the bill at the
opening ceremony, held last Thursday, was Manthia Diawara’s keynote
address ‘Can Documentary Change the World?’ Also showing was the film
professor’s documentary, ‘Who’s Afraid of Ngugi?’
Spread the word
Linking African
literature with the continent’s film culture, Diawara stressed the need
for more public intellectuals like Wole Soyinka, Chinua Achebe and
Nelson Mandela, who are renowned for their self-expression in spaces
with global influence. In his words, these people had the genius of
“having a place for their public intellectuals to express him or
herself and to have that expression change the world.”
Heralding what
would be a major pattern all through the day’s event, Diawara said
maintaining and updating national and historical archives was a very
important part of re-enforcing the African existence and was useful in
presenting images and stories to the world that were true and positive
of the continent. For him, the audience is home-based before it is
global. “Films (should) have their legitimacy first in Africa,” he
said. The problem with filmmaking in Africa, he said, is that, “We make
films by addressing the West…in doing this, we betray a whole point
of view…this is irrelevant in changing people’s lives here.”
He advised that filmmakers should learn to own Africa by first owning her myriad resources.
Presenting
Diawara’s new publication, ‘African Film: New Forms and Aesthetics,’
managing director of the Nigerian Film Corporation (NFC), Afolabi
Adesanya, supported the clamour for positive representations of Africa.
The history of colonisation in Africa, he said, would not allow a
European filmmaker make a movie that would be against his own. Adesanya
asked the industry “to take ownership of their images” and stop making
“films that put European audiences at their ease.” A trailer of the DVD
accompanying the book was then shown.
Tribute
Three ‘film heroes
past’ were honoured in a tribute. Veteran TV producer, diplomat and
arts patron, Segun Olusola, was at hand to present plaques to Brendan
Shehu, Tam Fiofori and Adegboyega Arulogun – all elder broadcasters who
had contributed immensely to the progress of TV and documentary films
in Nigeria.
Shehu, a former
director of the NFC, was grateful for the award that he said showed
efforts of his colleagues had not been in vain. For Arulogun, whom
Olusola described as a teacher of documentary filmmaking, the honour
was proof to upcoming filmmakers that “Nollywood was not created in a
vacuum.” International collaborations were vital for Nollywood to grow,
Arulogun said.
A painful experience
The audience’s
joyous mood turned sober with the screening of Diawara’s documentary on
the homecoming of Kenyan writer-activist, Ngugi Wa Thiong’o, after 22
years in exile. Scenes in the movie took the audience through Ngugi’s
early life to the Mau Mau struggle and its influence on current Kenyan
politics. There were a lot of soul-thumping scenes, but none more
moving than the sequence of shots that covered the attack on Ngugi’s
family and the rape of his wife during his return to Kenya. Diawara
himself admitted that it “was a painful film to make.”
Kiragu,
co-ordinator of the couple’s trip to Kenya, was arrested alongside four
others for the assault. The 84-minute film showed that there were mixed
feelings for Ngugi and his activism in the East African country. There
were a number of indispensable nuggets in the film such as Ngugi’s
comment that, “identifying with another person’s language above your
own is actually despising one’s self.”
For Ngugi, the film
and its contents contributed “yet another way of liberating Africa,”
according to Diawara, the film’s narrator, writer and director.
The programme
returned from recess to expound on issues of identity, consciousness
and logistics in documentary film making in a workshop session titled
‘Redeeming the African Image: A case for African Documentary Films.’
Moderator of the
session was Emeka Mba, director-general of the Nigerian Film and Video
Censors Board with the panel boasting Senegalese, Lydie Diakhate; Joke
Silva, Mahmoud Ali-Balogun and Jaiye Ojo.
Improving the art
During the
workshop, Diakhate, a film producer and festival organiser, said, it
was “crucial to have a platform to be able to show new images of
Africa.” She accentuated the presence of positive stories that can be
told about the continent and hailed festivals as medium for encouraging
co-operation, sharing experiences and improving production quality
amongst filmmakers.
On his part,
Ali-Balogun posed the question of what exactly a filmmaker sets out to
achieve with a documentary. Speaking personally, he said most of his
documentaries are advocacy tools meant for improving Nigeria. As a
patriotic movie maker, he would not peddle negative images of his
country for any reason. This, he said, was mostly impossible for those
who sourced their funds from abroad and had to ‘dance to the tune’ of
their sponsor.
In light of the
challenges facing those already established in the genre, the lot fell
on Ojo to allay the fears of aspiring filmmakers. Speaking in a
deservingly upbeat tone, he said there are avenues for surviving in the
trend despite a seemingly high frustration rate.
Joke Silva also
said that more skill acquisition centres were crucial to honing the
talent of the industry’s up and coming producers.
There was a slight
argument over how easy it was to shoot a documentary, but it was agreed
that the industry’s green horns should not see their task as daunting
but something that has to be done if the passion was there.
The moderator, Mba
summed it up by saying that the overall duty for filmmakers is to “tell
our stories in a more socially-responsible way.”
Doing this
effectively were the two other films on the event’s bill. Olu
Holloway’s ‘Slum Sweeper’ was an exposé on the construction of the
Second Mainland Bridge, widely known as the Eko Bridge.
The festival film,
Jihan El-Tahri’s ‘Behind the Rainbow,’ a documentary on South African
politics, closed the evening’s schedule at Terra Kulture.
Leave a Reply